Vanda PANTOJA and Bianca Silva FERREIRA
Rev. Cadernos de Campo, Araraquara, v. 23, n. esp. 2, e023014, 2023. e-ISSN: 2359-2419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47284/cdc.v23iesp.2.19215 7
context, activism for these women often represents not only a challenge to their public
interactions but also an act of rebellion within their homes.
These forms of restriction and limitation are most intensely manifested for Black,
Indigenous, quilombola, extractivist, unionist, uneducated women, and other identities marked
by difference. Ana Beatriz Rosa (2016), addressing the situation of Indigenous women, notes
that violence in rural areas is exacerbated when laws and institutional practices designed to
combat violence treat them as a "universal" being. This occurs because the State cannot
encompass all women, and many of them do not feel represented by public policy aimed at
protecting them from violence.
Regarding the complexity of the dynamics between being a woman and being a leader
in a structurally patriarchal society, and the difficulty men face in recognizing and validating
female leadership, Maria Querubina Silva Neta, who is a coconut breaker and union leader in
Maranhão, recounts in her autobiographical work, Uma mulher praticamente livre, the effort
women need to undertake to be recognized as leaders by their peers. Historically, unions,
associations, universities, and other entities have been spaces of power predominantly occupied
by men. In the Amazonian context, characterized by the historical process of reproducing
patriarchal relations, combined with the typical characteristics of frontier spaces, as emphasized
by José de Souza Martins (2016), women are often relegated to secondary roles, even when
they play leading roles, as evidenced in Silva Neta's biography (2018).
Female agency, which has always existed, although often invisible, gains prominence
when socio-territorial conflicts focus on communities, where women's actions are central due
to their prominence in the care economy. Research conducted in Amazonian contexts, but not
exclusively, has highlighted the central role of women in the struggle to defend their territories,
both in rural and urban areas. These analyses have approached the territory from the female
body, understanding it as a body-territory, a space of conflict but also of shelter, and have shown
women not only as participants in the struggle processes but as protagonists.
Studies, such as those conducted by Erica Santos and Vanda Pantoja (2023), analyze the
situation of women leaders facing criminalization and legal proceedings initiated by the
company Vale S.A. for defending their rights in territories affected by mining in the states of
Pará and Maranhão. In these regions, there is a faint presence of the welfare state, but a strong
influence of the State as an orderer, contributing to the organization of territory from the
perspective of capital rather than the citizen. Companies, in turn, adopt various strategies to
suppress leaders who, organized, denounce violations of their rights.