Online project-based language learning: A collaborative experience
Rev. EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 10, n. esp. 1, e024019, 2024. e-ISSN: 2447-3529
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v10iesp.1.18798 14
Regarding this, it is important to consider that granting students voice and autonomy to
discuss and determine the tools to be used, the roles to be played, and the products to be created,
while respecting and welcoming their ideas, all within a limited time frame and with set
deadlines, requires the teacher to have not only time management skills but, above all,
emotional sensitivity. Although it is understood that the focus of Project-Based Language
Learning should be on the process, in the end, a quality product must be delivered, which
certainly triggers pressures that need to be considered in project design.
Active educational approaches require proactivity not only from teachers but also from
learners. Like some teachers, certain learners also face challenges in abandoning traditional
practices and adopting a more active stance. One of the foundations of quality projects is the
creation of a learning culture that encourages student independence. However, the development
of autonomy for learning is a complex process that is built over time and involves the interaction
of various elements (Teng, 2019). Educational systems typically maintain a strong
centralization on the figure of the teacher, with learners still dependent. This is precisely why
the investment in active teaching methodologies is so necessary.
This investment begins with the teacher's preparation. As anticipated by theorists in the
field, Project-Based Language Learning (PBLL) requires study and preparation to ensure a
successful experience, which in turn involves a commitment of time. In this context,
collaborative work among teachers can prove to be a facilitating element, especially when
organized, as proposed by Damiani (2008):
(...) by working together, the members of a group support each other, aiming
to achieve common goals negotiated by the collective, establishing
relationships that tend toward non-hierarchical structures, shared leadership,
mutual trust, and shared responsibility for the conduct of actions (Damiani,
2008, p. 215, our translation).
The accounts of P1 and PC illustrate how this type of collaboration can facilitate the
actions of teachers, expanding their repertoire of practices, and also play a crucial role as
emotional and affective support:
P1: Our collaborative work, I thought, was essential (...) because you helped
me to have consistency in the classes, in the narrative, and in the guidance,
and also gave ideas for activities to be done. So, it was essential. Essential also
in the sense that it gave me more security, you know? I think teachers should
always work in pairs ((laughs)), doing these reflective sessions and, at the
same time, preparing the class and everything else.