Adauton Ezequiel Müller, Andréa Forgiarini Cecchin and Vanessa dos Santos Nogueira
RIAEE – Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, Araraquara, v. 18, n. 00, e023044, 2023. e-ISSN: 1982-5587
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v18i00.17184 7
The democratization of access to higher education, resulting from the increase
in the number of Federal Institutions of Higher Education (IFES), courses and
vacancies, the internalization of the campuses of the same institutions, greater
territorial mobility via ENEM/SISU and the reservation of vacancies for
students originating in public schools, through quotas (Income, PPI – blacks,
browns and indigenous peoples - and People with Disabilities), radically
changed the profile of the recent generation of students in undergraduate
courses at federal universities and Cefets MG and RJ (BRASIL, 2019, p. 2,
our translation).
In addition, it should be noted that the mobility provided by the SISU has also changed
the reality of the IFES and their daily lives, and has demanded greater investments and funding
from the Federal Government in the field of AE actions, in addition to having caused important
structural changes in the functioning of this policy, in the sense of serving the student population
in their demands (housing, food, transportation, health care, etc.) to guarantee the conditions of
permanence at the university. This dynamic relationship between the increased demand for
actions and the need for greater funding, in a context adopted by the Federal Government, of
cuts in resources for the field of Education, becomes a major institutional challenge for the
management of resources in the daily life of the IFES.
According to Perske (2020, p. 116, our translation): “[...] This is an increasingly frequent
situation at IFES, being a challenge both for students and educational institutions, as keeping
students becomes more complex than providing them with access”.
As the author indicates, keeping students in their courses, in this context of cuts and
restrictions in Student Assistance funding, challenges students with socioeconomic
vulnerability and educational institutions in the search for new ways of acting to overcome such
difficulties. These issues reflect on the completion of courses and the development of the
learning process; therefore, they indicate the need for attention and require measures to
modify/expand the possibilities of support that have been provided by the IFES.
In the same sense, Pozobon (2019, p. 74, our translation) comments that:
[...] it is worth remembering that it is the transfer of resources that effectively
allows the AE policy to be implemented and guarantees the necessary
institutional conditions for the attendance of students and the effectiveness of
what is proposed. Without State investments in human and material financial
resources, there is no guarantee of social rights, even if these rights are
constituted in legislation.
The author warns about the importance of the issue of Student Assistance financing and
the transfer of resources for the effectiveness of the policy in its role of guaranteeing the
institutional conditions for the permanence of students.