O conceito do fazer criativo como base para a organização do trabalho de investigação educacional e de design dos universitários

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17342

Palavras-chave:

Creative doing, The concept of creative doing, Educational work, Design and research activities, Humanitarian education, Higher education

Resumo

O objetivo deste trabalho é definir o termo fazer criativo, comparando-o com os termos criação e criatividade; definição do conceito de fazer criativo e sua estrutura, demonstração de exemplos de aplicação prática do conceito de fazer criativo em design e trabalhos de investigação de estudantes universitários. Ao organizar o trabalho educacional e de pesquisa dos alunos, foi usada uma abordagem de atividade de projeto. A ilustração de projetos criativos bem-sucedidos é realizada durante a organização de excursões com alunos a museus, propriedades, lugares históricos e memoráveis pelos professores. O conceito de fazer criativo é ilustrado pelo exemplo das atividades dos empresários russos do final do século XIX - início do XX. São propostos tópicos e etapas específicas de organização do projeto e do trabalho de pesquisa dos alunos, que é o significado prático deste estudo.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Elena Gladysheva, MIREA – Russian Technological University, Moscow – Russia

Candidate in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences.

Referências

ARHIPOVA, O.V.; SHOR, Y. M. Metafizika tvorchestva: Monografiya [Metaphysics of creativity: A monograph]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2021. 186 p.

BENTA, D.; BOLOGA, G.; DZITAC, I. E-learning platforms in higher education. Case study. Procedia Computer Science, v. 31, p. 1170-1176, 2014.

BERDYAEV, N.A. Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka [The meaning of creativity. The experience of justifying a person]. Moscow: Publishing house G.A. Leman and S.I. Sakharov, 1916.

BESKOVA, I.A. What can the study of culture give to the researcher of crativity. In: Smirnova, N. M. (Ed.). Filosofiya tvorchestva. Ezhegodnik RAN. IF. Sektor filosofskih problem tvorchestva [The philosophy of creativity. Yearbook of the Russian Academy of Sciences. IF. Sector of philosophical problems of creativity]. Moscow: Golos, 2020. p. 27-98.

BOGOYAVLENSKAYA, D.B. Report at the First Russian Scientific and Practical conference "Philosophy of Creativity". Moscow: IFRAN, 2015.

BOGOYAVLENSKAYA, D.B. The mechanism of creativity: Why we discover new things. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], n. 9, p. 82–89, 2021.

BRIAN, G. In the shadow of culture. In: Budushchee nauki v XXI veke. Sleduyushchie pyat'desyat let [The future of science in the XXI century. The next fifty years]. Moscow: AST: Astrel’; Vladimir: VKT, 2011.

BULGAKOV, S. N. Filopodia hozyajstva [Philosophy of economy]. Moscow: Nauka, 1990.

CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY. n.d. Available in: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/. Access: 5 jan. 2022.

DE CORTE, E. Innovative perspectives of teaching and learning in higher education in the XXI century. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Education issues], n. 3, p. 8-29, 2014.

EFIMOVA, G. Z.; SOROKIN, A. N.; GRIBOVSKY, M. V. Ideal teacher of higher school: Personal qualities and socio-professional competencies. Obrazovanie i Nauka [The Education and Science Journal], v. 23, n. 1, p. 202–230, 2021. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-202-230.

EFROIMSON, V.P. Genetika genial'nosti [The genetics of genius]. Moscow: AST, 2019. 480 p.

ENGELMEYER, P. K. Teoriya tvorchestva [Theory of creativity]. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom “Librokom”, 2010.

FLORIDA, R. Kreativnyj klass: Lyudi kotorye menyayut budushchee [Cretive class: People who are changing the future]. Moscow: Izdatel'skij dom “Klassika-XXI”, 2011.

FRANK, S. L. Smysl zhizni [The meaning of life]. Brussels: Zhizn' s Bogom, 1992. 78 p.

FRANKL, V. E. Man`s search of meaning. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2006.

GARDNER, G. Myshlenie budushchego. Pyat' strategij, vedushchih k uspekhu v zhizni [Thinking of the future. Five strategies leading to success in life]. Moscow: Al'pina Pablisher, 2019. 224 p.

GAUT, B. The philosophy of creativity. Philosophy Compass, v. 5, n. 12, p. 1034-1046, 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00351.x

GLADYSHEVA, E. The concept of creative doing in the philosophy of I.A. Ilyin and its application in modern liberal arts education in the high school. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya [Prospects of science and education], v. 2, n. 50, p. 10-22, 2021. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2021.2.1

GLADYSHEVA, E. V. Modern family in Russia: Philosophical understanding, experience of sociological analysis. In: RASTORGUEV, V. N. (Ed.). VIII anniversary Pan-Tatar readings "Youth - culture - politics: Historical memory and civilizational choice". Collection of articles. Moscow: MAX-PRESS, 2012. p. 460-468.

GLADYSHEVA, E.V. The influence of moral values on the success of economic activity (on the example of domestic entrepreneurs of the XIX-XX centuries). Rossijskij tekhnologicheskij zhurnal [Russian Technological Journal], v. 5, n. 4(18), p. 67-76, 2017.

GLADYSHEVA, E.V.; GLADYSHEVA, M.I. The phenomenon of creation in Russian culture. Cennosti i smysly [Values and meanings], v., n. 43, p. 89-100, 2016.

GORELOV, A. A. Freedom of thought and anti-creation. In: SMIRNOVA, N. M. (Ed.). Filosofiya tvorchestva. Ezhegodnik RAN. IF. Sektor filosofskih problem tvorchestva [The philosophy of creativity. Yearbook of the Russian Academy of Sciences. IF. Sector of philosophical problems of creativity]. Moscow: Golos, 2020. p. 136-182.

GRECHKO, P. K. Chelovek. K voprosu o proyektirovanii sebya [Person. On the question of designing oneself]. Questions of social theory, v. 8, n. 1-2, p. 25–34, 2016.

HARARI, Y. N. Homo Deus: Kratkaya istoriya budushchego [Homo Deus: A brief history of the future]. Moscow: Sindbad, 2018. 496 p.

ILYIN, I.A. Put' duhovnogo obnovleniya [The path of spiritual renewal]. St. Petersburg: Bibliopolis, 2006. 436 p.

IVIN, A.A. Filosofiya kollektivnogo tvorchestva: Monografiya [The philosophy of collective creativity: Monograph]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021. 352 p.

JUDRUPS, J. Analysis of knowledge management and e-learning integration models. Procedia Computer Science, v. 43, p. 154-162, 2015.

KARPOV, A.O. Universities in the Knowledge society: The problem of institutionalization of creativity. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical sciences], v. 62, no. 2, p. 77–95, 2019.

KEENGWE, J.; GEORGINA, D. The digital course training workshop for online learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, v. 17, n. 4, p. 365-379, 2012.

KROU, M.; DEBARS, U. Model' Novogo amerikanskogo universiteta [The model of the New American University]. Moscow: VSE, 2017. 440 p.

LEPSKY, V. Subject-oriented approach to the analysis of the crisis of technogenic civilization. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], n. 11, p. 35–38, 2021.

MARINOSYAN, H.E. Traditions and prospects of the classical University in the modern world. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical sciences], v. 64, n. 5, p. 7-19, 2021.

MAY, R. Muzhestvo tvorit' [The courage to create]. St.-Petersburg: Piter, 2020.

MINDELL, A. Kvantovyj um: Gran' mezhdu fizikoj i psihologiej [The quantum mind: The line between physics and psychology]. Moscow: Ganga, 2018. 716 p.

MINDELL, A. Snovidenie kak istochnik tvorchestva: 30 tvorcheskih i volshebnyh sposobov raboty nad soboj [The dream as a source of creativity: 30 creative and magical ways to work on yourself]. Moscow: Ganga, 2019. 288 p.

MORENO, V.; CAVAZOTTE, F.; ALVES, I. Explaining university students' effective use of e-learning platforms. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 48, n. 4, p. 995-1009, 2017.

NEMYCHENKOV, V.I. (Ed.). Tvorchestvo i razvitie obshchestva v XXI veke. Vzglyad nauki, filosofii i bogosloviya: Sbornik statej [Creativity and development of society in the XXI century. The view of science, philosophy and theology: A collection of articles]. Moscow: Aleteya, 2017. 606 p.

OXFORD DICTIONARY. n.d. Disponível em: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com. Access: 5 jan. 2022.

PEOPLES, J.; BAILEY, G. Humanity: An introduction to cultural anthropology. 11. ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning, 2017. 480 p.

PERIĆ, J. et al. Generation Z and volunteering: A national culture perspective. Obrazovanie i Nauka [The Education and Science Journal], v. 23, n. 1, p. 44–72, 2021. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-44-72

ROZIN, V. Man in the context of the transition from man-made civilization to post-culture (notes of a methodologist and a culturologist). Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], n. 11, p. 51-55, 2021.

SARTRE, J.-P. Existentialism is a humanism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007.

SAVKA, O.G. The impact of the humanitarian environment on improving the quality of training of specialists at a technical university. Rossijskij tekhnologicheskij zhurnal [Russian Technological Journal], v. 9, n. 5, p. 92-102, 2021. DOI: 10.32362/2500-316X-2021-9-5-95-101

STEPIN, V.S. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [The new philosophical encyclopedia]. 2. ed. Moscow: Mysl’, 2010.

UNESCO. Education 2030: Education outlook report, Mar. 8, 2019. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366976_eng/PDF/366976eng.pdf.multi. Acesso em: 5 jan. 2021.

UNESCO. Message from Ms Audrey Azoulay, Director-General of UNESCO, on the occasion of the International Day of Education. 2022. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380334?27=null&queryId=N-5060af81-899a-4c9f-8f9e-b81cbbcb. Acesso em: 5 fev. 2021.

Publicado

10/11/2022

Como Citar

GLADYSHEVA, E. O conceito do fazer criativo como base para a organização do trabalho de investigação educacional e de design dos universitários. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, Araraquara, v. 26, n. 00, p. e022151, 2022. DOI: 10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17342. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/rpge/article/view/17342. Acesso em: 4 dez. 2022.

Artigos Semelhantes

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.