Networked learning behavior in Higher Education: a moderated mediation analysis of TPACK and AI readiness

Kriti Sarkar; Suman Bose

doi:10.22633/rpge.v30i00.21140

Autores/as

Kriti Sarkar University of Engineering & Management https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9360-1738
Suman Bose University of Engineering & Management https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-0820

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v30i00.21140

Palabras clave:

Aprendizaje en red, TPACK, Preparación para la IA, Educación superior, Infraestructura digital

Resumen

Este estudio examina las relaciones estructurales entre la preparación para la inteligencia artificial (IA), el conocimiento tecnológico pedagógico del contenido (TPACK) y el comportamiento de aprendizaje en red entre docentes universitarios de la India. Con un diseño cuantitativo transversal, prueba un modelo de mediación moderada en el que el TPACK media la relación entre la preparación para la IA y el comportamiento de aprendizaje en red, mientras que la infraestructura digital institucional modera este efecto indirecto. Se empleó el modelado de ecuaciones estructurales para evaluar las relaciones. Los resultados muestran que la preparación para la IA incrementa significativamente el TPACK, que, a su vez, predice fuertemente el comportamiento de aprendizaje en red. El TPACK constituye el principal mecanismo, y el efecto indirecto es mayor en instituciones con infraestructura digital desarrollada. El estudio destaca la importancia de integrar la preparación para la IA, la competencia pedagógica y el apoyo digital institucional.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Kriti Sarkar, University of Engineering & Management

University of Engineering & Management (UEM), Kolkata – West Bengal – India. Associate Professor. Department of Basic Sciences and Humanities.

Suman Bose, University of Engineering & Management

University of Engineering & Management (UEM), Kolkata – West Bengal – India. Researcher. Department of Management.

Citas

Ayanwale, M. A., Misu, E. E., & Molefi, R. R. (2022). Towards artificial intelligence readiness: Development and validation of an AI readiness scale for educators. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11837–11860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11080-y

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BC Open Textbooks.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). A review of the quantitative measures of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (2nd ed., pp. 87–106). Routledge.

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2022). Past, present, and future of smart learning: A topic-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Kluwer Academic.

Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Hodgson, V., McConnell, D., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2020). The theory, practice and pedagogy of networked learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning (pp. 1–26). Springer.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016). Emerging technologies in the field: Today’s EdTech topics and trends. TechTrends, 60(5), 425–432.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). Do you accept AI-based recommendations in technology-enhanced learning? The role of AI self-efficacy and the UTAUT2 model. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 169, 102934.

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

Trist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems (Occasional Paper No. 2). Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing.

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Mäkitalo, K., Hoang, N., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Tondeur, J. (2021). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 1–18.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.