‘nec’ discourse structuring particle (latin) endured in contemporary portuguese ‘nem’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5794-e18095Keywords:
nominal quantifier negation, universal quantifiers, diachronic evolution from Latin to Portuguesenec (Latin), nem (Portuguese)Abstract
Contemporary Portuguese does not have a direct negator for D-quantifiers (*‘Não cada cachorro late’ ‘Not every dog barks’) (Souza, 2017); but a combination of ‘todo’ with ‘nem’, derived from Latin’s ‘nec’ (‘Nem todo cachorro late’/ ‘Not all dogs bark’), apparently yields a universal negation reading (¬∀). However, ‘nem’ is restrained to the very beginning of the sentence (*‘Eu não vi nem todo cachorro correr’ ‘I didn’t see every dog run’), or follows a topic (‘À minha aula, nem todo aluno veio’ ‘To my class, not every student came’) (Peres, 2013). Following Gianollo (2020), ‘nem todo’ is analyzed as a discourse structuring particle. ‘Nem’ contains an additive layer over a negation component. It denies the maximization presupposition triggered by the universal quantifier, linking the new information given by the pronounced sentence to previously established contextual information. ‘Nem todo’ instructs the conversation participants to correct their common ground expectations about the participation of the entire nominal domain in the situation. By ‘nem’s distribution in Brazilian Portuguese today and its presence from the XV century to the XXI century, ‘nec’ as a discourse structuring particle did not disappear in romance languages, contrary to Gianollo (2020).
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ALFA: Revista de Linguística
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Manuscripts accepted for publication and published are property of Alfa: Revista de Linguística. It is forbidden the full or partial submission of the manuscript to any other journal. Authors are solely responsible for the article's content. Translation into another language without written permission from the Editor advised by the Editorial Board is prohibited.