Religion in the Brazilian judicial review decisions: an analysis of the possible consequences of ‘PEC 99/11’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52780/res.11712Keywords:
Judicial review, Religious associations, PEC 99/11, STF,Abstract
Taking into account the proposal of constitutional amendment number 99, year 2011 (PEC 99/11) – which gives greater political power to religious associations in the context of increased judicialization of politics by allowing these associations to introduce legislation for judicial review – this research examines how religious arguments and interests have gained ground in the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF), even without the institutionalization of the PEC. In order to do this, the article analyzes decisions of the court in cases that the National Confederation of Brazilian Bishops Brazilian (CNBB) – an example of a religious association that would benefit from the PEC – has shown interest. The conclusion reached by the study is that, although through indirect means, religious arguments are sometimes heard in Brazilian judicial reviews. However, these arguments have not found shelter in our supreme court’s decisions.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
À revista Estudos de Sociologia ficam reservados os direitos autorais pertinentes a todos os artigos nela publicados.
Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na revista Estudos de Sociologia são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
A Estudos de Socilogia utiliza a licença https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY), que permite o compartilhamento do artigo com o reconhecimento da autoria.