International disparities and internal market: a comparison between Celso Furtado's perspectives and the prescriptions of the human development reports

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52780/res.10777

Keywords:

Social and human development, Future, Prospective approaches,

Abstract

Celso Furtado’s analysis shows what are the obstacles that impede, in each socio-historical context, the human development in Latin America in general and specifically in Brazil. Therefore, this research adopts a qualitative methodological perspective, through a bibliographical and documentary analysis whose objective is to unveil the political meanings of prospective approaches analyzed in this article (the one built in the UNDP / UN Human Development Reports and the one elaborated by Celso Furtado). It should be noted that the main difference between these two ways of dealing with development lies in the way each of them deals with the socio-historical process in relation to the blockages that intervene in the construction of a valuing future of human improvements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fábio Akira Shishito, USP – Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia Letras e Ciências Humanas. São Paulo – SP – Brasil.

Mestre em Ciências Sociais pela UEL

Doutorando em Sociologia pela USP

Professor de Sociologia na UEL.

Maria José de Rezende, UEL – Universidade Estadual de Londrina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia. Londrina – PR – Brasil.

doutora em sociologia pela USP

Mestre em Ciências Sociais pela PUC/SP

Professora de Sociologia na UEL 

Downloads

Published

13/02/2019

How to Cite

SHISHITO, F. A.; REZENDE, M. J. de. International disparities and internal market: a comparison between Celso Furtado’s perspectives and the prescriptions of the human development reports. Estudos de Sociologia, Araraquara, v. 23, n. 45, 2019. DOI: 10.52780/res.10777. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/10777. Acesso em: 25 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 45 (2018): Dossiê: Judicialização da sociedade e da política

Section

Varia

License

Creative Commons License
À revista Estudos de Sociologia ficam reservados os direitos autorais pertinentes a todos os artigos nela publicados.

Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na revista Estudos de Sociologia são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.

A Estudos de Socilogia utiliza a licença https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY), que permite o compartilhamento do artigo com o reconhecimento da autoria.