Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52780/res.11702

Keywords:

Discretion, Criminal Justice, Social Theory, Plea Bargain, Brazil,

Abstract

The introduction of the plea bargain in Brazilian’s legislation granted prosecutors a type of power generally called discretion. Failure to understand this change has caused difficulties in its analysis. In this article an effort is made to define discretion and review its use as a scientific concept in both the social sciences and legal studies with the goal of providing a better understanding of the subject to the scientific and public debate. Through the critical reading of published works in English as well as from Brazilian researchers that utilize its premises and methods, it is concluded that discretion as a concept has been used in variety of ways and that it is inadequate as an answer to questions that it has helped to ask. Finally, an alternative framework for social analysis is proposed in which discretion is decomposed before being requalified by social theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Eduardo Casteluci, USP – Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia

Pesquisador na área da sociologia da administração do sistema de justiça criminal com ênfase nos estudos sobre o processo decisório dos servidores da justiça e das transformações em suas práticas.

Published

13/02/2019

How to Cite

CASTELUCI, E. Discretion in criminal justice: developing a framework for analysis. Estudos de Sociologia, Araraquara, v. 23, n. 45, 2019. DOI: 10.52780/res.11702. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/estudos/article/view/11702. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.