O acesso diferenciado à cidadania na bioética feminista
Uma revisão das críticas em torno dos ideais de imparcialidade e autonomia absoluta na bioética predominante
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47284/cdc.v24iesp.2.18991Palavras-chave:
Bioética, Feminismo, Cidadania, DiferençaResumo
A partir do final da década de 1960, as reivindicações feministas – e de outros movimentos sociais – por um acesso diferenciado à cidadania têm colocado em segundo plano as demandas tradicionais pela extensão de uma cidadania universal sem distinções. Este artigo tem como objetivo explorar, especificamente, as abordagens da bioética feminista em relação ao acesso diferenciado à cidadania nos campos da saúde e da ética médica. Através de uma revisão bibliográfica dessa literatura, este trabalho reconstrói essas reivindicações a partir das críticas formuladas pela bioética feminista contra dois ideais assumidos pela bioética predominante: o da imparcialidade e o da autonomia absoluta. A análise dessas abordagens revela a importância de promover, nos campos da saúde e da ética médica, uma política igualitária da diferença baseada na paridade participativa de agentes entendidos como concretos e inter-relacionados.
Downloads
Referências
BAIER, A. Cartesian Persons. In: Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985, p. 74-92.
BEAUCHAMP, T. L.; CHILDRESS, J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
BENHABIB, S. El otro generalizado y el otro concreto: la controversia Kohlberg-Gilligan y la teoría feminista. In: BENHABIB, S.; CORNELL, D. (ed.). Teoría feminista y teoría crítica: Ensayos sobre la política de género en las sociedades de capitalismo tardío. Valencia: Alfons el Magnànim, 1990. p. 119-149.
CHESLER, P. Women and Madness: When is a Woman Mad and Who is it Who Decides? New York: Doubleday, 1972.
CLOUSER, K. D.; GERT, B. A critique of principlism. The journal of medicine and philosophy, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 219-236, 1990.
COREA, G. The Mother Machine: reproductive technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 1, p. 357-363, 1985.
CORRIGAN, O. P. ‘First in man’: The politics and ethics of women in clinical drug trials. Feminist Review, [S. l.], v. 72, n. 1, p. 40-52, 2002.
DANIELS, N. Just Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
DINIZ, D.; GUILHEM, D. Bioética feminista: o resgate político do conceito de vulnerabilidade. Revista Bioética, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, 2009.
DONCHIN, A. Understanding Autonomy Relationally: Toward a Reconfiguration of Bioethical Principles. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 4, p. 365-386, 2001.
EDWARDS, S. D. Three versions of an ethics of care. Nursing Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 231-240, 2009.
EHRENREICH, B.; ENGLISH, D. Witches, Midwives and Nurses: A History of Women. New York: The Feminist Press, 1973.
FIRESTONE, S. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003/1970.
FRASER, N. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, [S. l.], v. 25, n. 26, p. 56-80, 1990.
FRICKER, M. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
GARRAFA, V. Introdução à bioética. Revista do hospital universitário UFMA, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 9-13, 2005.
GARRAFA, V.; OSÓRIO, E. O. D. Epistemología de la bioética. Enfoque latinoamericano. Revista colombiana de Bioética, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 73-92, 2009.
GILLIGAN, C. In a Different Voice: Psycological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
HARBIN, A. Disorientation and the medicalization of struggle. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 99-121, 2014.
HELD, V. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
HOLMES, H. B.; PURDY, L. M. (ed.). Feminist perspectives in medical ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.
KANT, I. Fundamentación de la Metafísica de las Costumbres. Barcelona: Ariel, 1999.
KINNEY, E. L. et al. Underrepresentation of women in new drug trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, [S. l.], v. 95, p. 495-499, 1981.
KITTAY, E. F. From the ethics of care to global justice. Jendâ Kenkyû/Journal of Gender Studies, [S. l.], v. 14, p. 113-120, 2001.
KITTAY, E. F.; FEDER, E. K. (ed.). The subject of care: feminist perspectives on dependency. New Jersey: Rowman; Littlefield Publishers, 2003.
KUHSE, H. Caring: nurses, women and ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
LINDEMANN, H. N. Feminist Bioethics: Where We've Been, Where We's Going. Metaphilosophy, [S. l.], v. 31, n. 5, p. 492-508, 2000.
LITTLE, M. O. Why a Feminist Approach to Bioethics? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-18, 1996.
LÓPEZ DE LA VIEJA, M. T. Bioética Feminista. Dilemata, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 15, p. 143-152, 2014.
LUNA, F.; SALLES, A.L.F. Bioética: Nuevas reflexiones sobre debates clásicos. México: FCE, 2008.
MACKAY, K. A Feminist Analysis of Anti-Obesity Campaigns: Manipulation, Oppression, and Autonomy. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 61-78, 2017.
MACKENZIE, C; STOLJAR, N. Introduction: Autonomy Refigured. In: MACKENZIE, C.; STOLJAR, N. (ed.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. p. 3-34.
MAHOWALD, M. B. On treatment of myopia: Feminist standpoint theory and bioethics. In: WOLF, S. M. (ed.). Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. p. 95-115.
MAHOWALD, M. B. Bioethics and women: across the life span. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
MARTIN, N. Feminist bioethics and psychiatry. The Journal of medicine and philosophy, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 4, p. 431-441, 2001.
MCLEOD, C; SHERWIN, S. Relational Autonomy, Self-Trust, and Health Care for Patients Who Are Oppressed. In: MACKENZIE, C.; STOLJAR, N. (ed.). Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. p. 259-279.
Mill, J. S. Sobre la libertad. Madrid: Alianza, 2001.
MILLETT, K. Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday, 1970.
MORGAN, K. P. Contested Bodies, Contested Knowledges: Women, Health, and the Politics of Medicalization. In: SHERWIN, S. (coord.). The Politics of Women's Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998. p. 83-121.
OKIN, S. M. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic books, 1989.
OVERALL, C. Ethics and Human Reproduction. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987.
PATEMAN, C. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
PATEMAN, C. The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism, and political theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.
PATEMAN, C. Críticas feministas a la dicotomía público/privado. In: CASTELLS, C. (Coord.), Perspectivas feministas en teoría política. Barcelona: Paidós, 1996. p. 31-52.
POST, S. G. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3. ed. New York: Gale, 2004. v. 1.
POTTER, V. R. Bioethics: bridge to the future. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
RAWLS, J. A. Teoría de la justicia. México: FCE, 1995.
RAYMOND, J. The international traffic in women: women used in system of surrogacy and reproduction. Reproductive and Genetic Engineering, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 51-57, 1989.
ROSENBERG, C. S. The Hysterical Woman: Sex Roles and Role Conflict in 19th-Century America, Social Research, [S. l.], v. 39, p. 652-678, 1972.
SCULLY, J. L. Feminist bioethics. In: HALL, K. Q.; ÁSTA (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. p. 272–286.
SEVENHUIJSEN, S. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London/New York: Routledge, 1998.
SHALEV, C. Birth Power: The Case for Surrogacy. London: New Haven, 1989.
SHERWIN, S. No longer patient: Feminist ethics and health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992.
SHERWIN, S. Women in Clinical Studies: A Feminist View. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 533-538, 1994.
SHERWIN, S. Feminist Reflections on the Role of Theories in Global Bioethics. In: TONG, R; ANDERSON, G.; SANTOS, A. (ed.). Globalizing Feminist Bioethics: Crosscultural Perspectives. Boulder: Westview Press, 2001. p. 12-26.
STARR, P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
STOLCKE, V. New reproductive technologies: The old quest for fatherhood. Reproductive and Genetic Engineering: Journal of International Feminist Analysis, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 5-19, 1988.
THACHUK, A. K. Stigma and the Politics of Biomedical Models of Mental Illness. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 140-163, 2011.
THE BOSTON WOMEN'S HEALTH BOOK COLLECTIVE. Our Bodies, Ourselves: A Book By and For Women. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1973.
THOMSON, J. A defense of Abortion. In: KUHSE, H; SCHÜKLENK, U.; SINGER, P. (ed.). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford: John Wiley; Sons, Inc, 2016/1971. p. 38-48.
TONG, R. Feminine and feminist ethics. Social Philosophy Today, [S. l.], v. 10, p. 183-205, 1995.
TONG, R. Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. In: WOLF, S. M. (ed). Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. p. 67-94.
TRONTO, J. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York/London: Routledge, 1993.
WALKER, M. U. Introduction. In: LINDEMANN, H.; VERKERK, M.; WALKER, M. U. (ed.). Naturalized bioethics: toward responsible knowing and practice. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 1-22.
WOLF, S. M. Introduction: Gender and feminism in bioethics. In: WOLF, S. M. (ed.). Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. p. 3-43.
WOLLSTONECRAFT, M. Vindicación de los derechos de la mujer. Madrid: Cátedra, 2018/1792.
YOUNG, I. M. Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, [S. l.], v. 99, n. 2, p. 250-274, 1989.
YOUNG, I. M. La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 2000.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Cadernos de Campo: Revista de Ciências Sociais
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
