El acceso diferenciado a la ciudadanía en la bioética feminista
Una revisión de las críticas en torno a los ideales de imparcialidad y autonomía absoluta en la bioética predominante
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.47284/cdc.v24iesp.2.18991Mots-clés :
Bioética, Feminismo, Ciudadanía, DiferenciaRésumé
Desde finales de la década del sesenta, las reivindicaciones feministas –y de otros movimientos sociales– por un acceso diferenciado a la ciudadanía han ido desplazando a las tradicionales demandas por la extensión de una ciudadanía universal sin distinciones. Este artículo se propone explorar, específicamente, los abordajes de la bioética feminista respecto al acceso diferenciado a la ciudadanía en los campos de la salud y de la ética médica. Mediante una revisión bibliográfica de ese marco teórico, este trabajo reconstruye esas reivindicaciones a partir de las críticas formuladas por la bioética feminista contra dos ideales asumidos por el marco bioético predominante: el de imparcialidad y el de autonomía absoluta. El análisis de sus abordajes revela la importancia de promover, en los ámbitos de la salud y de la ética médica, una política igualitaria de la diferencia basada en la paridad participativa de agentes entendidos como concretos e interrelacionados.
Téléchargements
Références
BAIER, A. Cartesian Persons. In: Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985, p. 74-92.
BEAUCHAMP, T. L.; CHILDRESS, J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
BENHABIB, S. El otro generalizado y el otro concreto: la controversia Kohlberg-Gilligan y la teoría feminista. In: BENHABIB, S.; CORNELL, D. (ed.). Teoría feminista y teoría crítica: Ensayos sobre la política de género en las sociedades de capitalismo tardío. Valencia: Alfons el Magnànim, 1990. p. 119-149.
CHESLER, P. Women and Madness: When is a Woman Mad and Who is it Who Decides? New York: Doubleday, 1972.
CLOUSER, K. D.; GERT, B. A critique of principlism. The journal of medicine and philosophy, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 219-236, 1990.
COREA, G. The Mother Machine: reproductive technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 1, p. 357-363, 1985.
CORRIGAN, O. P. ‘First in man’: The politics and ethics of women in clinical drug trials. Feminist Review, [S. l.], v. 72, n. 1, p. 40-52, 2002.
DANIELS, N. Just Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
DINIZ, D.; GUILHEM, D. Bioética feminista: o resgate político do conceito de vulnerabilidade. Revista Bioética, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, 2009.
DONCHIN, A. Understanding Autonomy Relationally: Toward a Reconfiguration of Bioethical Principles. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 4, p. 365-386, 2001.
EDWARDS, S. D. Three versions of an ethics of care. Nursing Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 231-240, 2009.
EHRENREICH, B.; ENGLISH, D. Witches, Midwives and Nurses: A History of Women. New York: The Feminist Press, 1973.
FIRESTONE, S. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003/1970.
FRASER, N. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, [S. l.], v. 25, n. 26, p. 56-80, 1990.
FRICKER, M. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
GARRAFA, V. Introdução à bioética. Revista do hospital universitário UFMA, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 9-13, 2005.
GARRAFA, V.; OSÓRIO, E. O. D. Epistemología de la bioética. Enfoque latinoamericano. Revista colombiana de Bioética, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 73-92, 2009.
GILLIGAN, C. In a Different Voice: Psycological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
HARBIN, A. Disorientation and the medicalization of struggle. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 99-121, 2014.
HELD, V. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
HOLMES, H. B.; PURDY, L. M. (ed.). Feminist perspectives in medical ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.
KANT, I. Fundamentación de la Metafísica de las Costumbres. Barcelona: Ariel, 1999.
KINNEY, E. L. et al. Underrepresentation of women in new drug trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, [S. l.], v. 95, p. 495-499, 1981.
KITTAY, E. F. From the ethics of care to global justice. Jendâ Kenkyû/Journal of Gender Studies, [S. l.], v. 14, p. 113-120, 2001.
KITTAY, E. F.; FEDER, E. K. (ed.). The subject of care: feminist perspectives on dependency. New Jersey: Rowman; Littlefield Publishers, 2003.
KUHSE, H. Caring: nurses, women and ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
LINDEMANN, H. N. Feminist Bioethics: Where We've Been, Where We's Going. Metaphilosophy, [S. l.], v. 31, n. 5, p. 492-508, 2000.
LITTLE, M. O. Why a Feminist Approach to Bioethics? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-18, 1996.
LÓPEZ DE LA VIEJA, M. T. Bioética Feminista. Dilemata, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 15, p. 143-152, 2014.
LUNA, F.; SALLES, A.L.F. Bioética: Nuevas reflexiones sobre debates clásicos. México: FCE, 2008.
MACKAY, K. A Feminist Analysis of Anti-Obesity Campaigns: Manipulation, Oppression, and Autonomy. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 61-78, 2017.
MACKENZIE, C; STOLJAR, N. Introduction: Autonomy Refigured. In: MACKENZIE, C.; STOLJAR, N. (ed.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. p. 3-34.
MAHOWALD, M. B. On treatment of myopia: Feminist standpoint theory and bioethics. In: WOLF, S. M. (ed.). Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. p. 95-115.
MAHOWALD, M. B. Bioethics and women: across the life span. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
MARTIN, N. Feminist bioethics and psychiatry. The Journal of medicine and philosophy, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 4, p. 431-441, 2001.
MCLEOD, C; SHERWIN, S. Relational Autonomy, Self-Trust, and Health Care for Patients Who Are Oppressed. In: MACKENZIE, C.; STOLJAR, N. (ed.). Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. p. 259-279.
Mill, J. S. Sobre la libertad. Madrid: Alianza, 2001.
MILLETT, K. Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday, 1970.
MORGAN, K. P. Contested Bodies, Contested Knowledges: Women, Health, and the Politics of Medicalization. In: SHERWIN, S. (coord.). The Politics of Women's Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998. p. 83-121.
OKIN, S. M. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic books, 1989.
OVERALL, C. Ethics and Human Reproduction. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987.
PATEMAN, C. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
PATEMAN, C. The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism, and political theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.
PATEMAN, C. Críticas feministas a la dicotomía público/privado. In: CASTELLS, C. (Coord.), Perspectivas feministas en teoría política. Barcelona: Paidós, 1996. p. 31-52.
POST, S. G. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3. ed. New York: Gale, 2004. v. 1.
POTTER, V. R. Bioethics: bridge to the future. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
RAWLS, J. A. Teoría de la justicia. México: FCE, 1995.
RAYMOND, J. The international traffic in women: women used in system of surrogacy and reproduction. Reproductive and Genetic Engineering, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 51-57, 1989.
ROSENBERG, C. S. The Hysterical Woman: Sex Roles and Role Conflict in 19th-Century America, Social Research, [S. l.], v. 39, p. 652-678, 1972.
SCULLY, J. L. Feminist bioethics. In: HALL, K. Q.; ÁSTA (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. p. 272–286.
SEVENHUIJSEN, S. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London/New York: Routledge, 1998.
SHALEV, C. Birth Power: The Case for Surrogacy. London: New Haven, 1989.
SHERWIN, S. No longer patient: Feminist ethics and health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992.
SHERWIN, S. Women in Clinical Studies: A Feminist View. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 533-538, 1994.
SHERWIN, S. Feminist Reflections on the Role of Theories in Global Bioethics. In: TONG, R; ANDERSON, G.; SANTOS, A. (ed.). Globalizing Feminist Bioethics: Crosscultural Perspectives. Boulder: Westview Press, 2001. p. 12-26.
STARR, P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
STOLCKE, V. New reproductive technologies: The old quest for fatherhood. Reproductive and Genetic Engineering: Journal of International Feminist Analysis, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 5-19, 1988.
THACHUK, A. K. Stigma and the Politics of Biomedical Models of Mental Illness. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 140-163, 2011.
THE BOSTON WOMEN'S HEALTH BOOK COLLECTIVE. Our Bodies, Ourselves: A Book By and For Women. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1973.
THOMSON, J. A defense of Abortion. In: KUHSE, H; SCHÜKLENK, U.; SINGER, P. (ed.). Bioethics: An Anthology. Oxford: John Wiley; Sons, Inc, 2016/1971. p. 38-48.
TONG, R. Feminine and feminist ethics. Social Philosophy Today, [S. l.], v. 10, p. 183-205, 1995.
TONG, R. Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. In: WOLF, S. M. (ed). Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. p. 67-94.
TRONTO, J. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York/London: Routledge, 1993.
WALKER, M. U. Introduction. In: LINDEMANN, H.; VERKERK, M.; WALKER, M. U. (ed.). Naturalized bioethics: toward responsible knowing and practice. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 1-22.
WOLF, S. M. Introduction: Gender and feminism in bioethics. In: WOLF, S. M. (ed.). Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. p. 3-43.
WOLLSTONECRAFT, M. Vindicación de los derechos de la mujer. Madrid: Cátedra, 2018/1792.
YOUNG, I. M. Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, [S. l.], v. 99, n. 2, p. 250-274, 1989.
YOUNG, I. M. La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 2000.
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Cadernos de Campo: Revista de Ciências Sociais 2024
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .