About the Journal
Focus and Scope
The Journal Cadernos de Campo is a semi-annual publication edited by students of the Graduate Program in Social Sciences of the Faculty of Sciences and Letters in Araraquara (Fclar) of the Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” University (UNESP). The journal aims to disseminate the scientific studies and researches produced by graduate students and professors of the social science field. It prioritizes the academic nature of studies and dialogues with other subareas like anthropology, political science and sociology and, including related areas, such as history, geography, pedagogy, economy, international relations and philosophy, in order to comprise a wide variety of areas in the humanities. The journal structure accepts publications of thematic dossiers as well as free papers, reviews, special collaboration, interviews, translations, besides a destined space to the imagination of social sciences, for instance, the publication of photographic essays, illustrations, engravings, poetry or any other artistic manifestation related to the thematic number.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Publication Ethics and Declaration of Negligence
Anti-Plagiarism Policy
Authors must guarantee the originality of the text. No form of plagiarism will be accepted (Brazilian Law No. 9.610 / 1998). The papers submitted by the authors to this Journal must be original and will be checked with anti-plagiarism software before being sent for evaluation. The text will be disregarded if any form of plagiarism or self-plagiarism is identified. Plagiarism occurs when someone copies the intellectual work of another in whole or in parts of that work without assigning the due credit. Self-plagiarism contemplates the reproduction, in total or partially, of a production of own authorship, already published, without the due identification. It will not be considered as self-plagiarism, by this Magazine, work derived from: - theses, dissertations, research reports, if the text is prepared in a recognized scientific article format; - papers presented at scientific events and published in annals, if there is an investment of authorship, being presented enlarged version with new data and reflections. In both cases, the author must clearly state the original publication.
Conflict of interests and research ethics
The Journal adopts procedures that avoid conflicts of interest during the evaluation stages of submitted articles. To ensure the integrity of blind peer evaluation for submissions to the journal, every care should be taken not to disclose the identity of authors and reviewers between them during the process. This requires that authors, editors, and evaluators (who are able to send documents to the system as part of the evaluation process) take some precautions with the text and properties of the document:
1. The authors of the document must exclude names from the text, replacing them with "Author" and the year in references and footnotes, instead of author names, article title, etc.
2. In Microsoft Office documents, the author's ID must be removed from the document's properties (in the menu File> Properties), starting File in the main menu and clicking on the sequence: File> Save As ...> Tools (or Options on the Mac)> Security Options ...> Remove personal information from the file when saving> OK> Save.
3. In PDFs, authors' names must also be removed from Document Properties in “File” on the Adobe Acrobat main menu.
All sources of funding that the project has received must be disclosed in addition to previously reported conflicts of interest that include employment, consulting, stock ownership, fees, patent/registration applications, and grants or other financing. If the research carried out or the publication of the article may raise doubts about potential conflicts of interest, the author should state in a final note that no links to funding bodies, as well as to commercial or political institutions, have been omitted. Likewise, mention should be made of the institution to which the author may be bound, or who has collaborated in the execution of the study, evidencing that there are no conflicts of interest with the result presented herein. It is also necessary to inform that the interviews, questionnaires, focus groups among other data collection tools and interventions involving human beings obeyed the established ethical procedures for scientific research.
Research Risks
In the cases of human participation in the research, terms of consent in research should be sent in Supplementary Documents proving that all procedures were carried out in accordance with laws and institutional guidelines or the appropriate committee to evaluate. The right to privacy of persons and institutions must be guaranteed. Products, procedures or equipment that may represent a danger to the replication of the research should be identified in the text.
Access and retention of data
Authors may be required to make research data available for editorial review or to the public as well as to retain such data for a period of time after publication, as directed by the Editorial Board.
Multiple publications
An author, in general, should not publish the same text in different journals. In some cases, as long as the conditions and rules of publication are respected, translations of works already published, with the appropriate authorizations from the original sources, are acceptable.
Identification of errors in published texts
It is the obligation of the author to correct or to present evidence on the accuracy of the research when the author or third parties identify errors and/or inaccuracies in published texts.
Right of reply
Matters of comment to the article published in the journal, as well as a reply to the comment, will be submitted to the same process of evaluation of the other submissions. In case of acceptance for publication, the author will be offered equal space for reply, being able to be published in the same number or in a subsequent number.
Privacy policy
The names and addresses informed in this journal will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication and are not available for other purposes or to third parties.
Opinion
The document should be treated as confidential. The opinion must be objective, clear and constructive. You must not accept texts that have conflicts or affinity, collaboration or other type of connection with one of the authors, companies or institutions related to the article.
Contribution to editorial decisions
Peer review helps the editor in editorial decisions, it is essential for the scientific method. So, all contributors can contribute to the review of submitted articles.
Promptness
Any reviewer, upon receiving a work, must communicate to the editor the prompt review or the impossibility in analyzing the material.
Confidentiality
Any work must be reviewed under confidentiality.
Standards of objectivity
Comments must be objective and supported by arguments.
Notice of sources
Reviewers must indicate when a published work has not been cited by the author. The reviewer must also communicate to the editor when identifying more than one work with any substantial similarity or overlapping of texts.
Disclosure and conflict of interest
Unpublished articles to be published need the express authorization of the author. Privileged information obtained in the peer review must be kept confidential and cannot be used for personal gain.
Editors
Assessment must be based solely on academic merit. The publisher should not use search information without the author's consent. You need to respond when ethical complaints are made about a particular text.
Editorial Board
Publishing decisions
The publisher is responsible for deciding which submissions will be published. It should be driven by the validation of the research and relevance of the work to researchers and readers. The works may be, at the discretion of the Editorial Board, previously published in the ahead of print system, before actually compiling a Journal issue.
Impartiality
Papers must be evaluated for their academic content without distinction of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or the authors' political philosophy.
Confidentiality
The publisher and editorial staff should not disclose information about any work submitted to publication, except for reviewers.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Any conflict of interest resulting from competition, collaboration, or other relationships or liaison with one of the authors, companies or employees, must be treated in a serious manner and in harmony with the Editorial Board. -
Involvement and cooperation in investigations
Each act of unethical publication behavior must be analyzed, investigated and portrayed even after years of the publication date.
Peer Review Process
The Journal submits the papers to the Editorial Board (experts of recognized scientific or academic merit) who decide, in a secretive manner, on the convenience of accepting the texts for publication. After the analysis, an opinion will be issued and sent to the author with one of the following possibilities: a) full acceptance of the matter for publication; b) review of the parts pointed out by the referees; c) final refusal of the matter. After due corrections and/or suggestions, the article will be accepted for publication if you have two favorable opinions; and rejected when two opinions are unfavorable. In the case of a favorable and an unfavorable opinion, the decision on the publication or not of the article shall go to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
The Journal reserves the right to refuse articles that do not comply with its editorial guidelines and the modifications suggested by the Editorial Board.
The signed articles will be the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily express the opinion of the journal. This section includes articles that have already been approved for publication, but are not yet allocated to an issue with volume and number. The publication of the articles in this format does not mean the insertion of these in the next issue to be released.
Accepted material may be published in the ahead of print section before being allocated to an issue with volume and number and subsequently published in upcoming issues, with the editors being better able to insert the material into the journal.
The Journal reserves the right to modify the text, when necessary, without prejudice to its content, with the aim of standardizing the presentation and reformulating the language, if necessary.
Deadline for reply to authors
After submitting the paper, the deadline for replying to the authors about acceptance or refusal depends on the complexity of the opinions and the modifications recommended and performed. The publication of the work will be defined by the Editorial Committee, on each issue, taking into account the antiquity of submission, the diversification of institutions and regions of origin of the authors.
The Journal adopts a Creative Commons license CC-BY
