Los rasgos dominantes de la linguística de internet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7i00.15954Palabras clave:
Discurso electrónico, Comunicación electrónica, Lengua extranjeraResumen
Esta investigación se centra en los rasgos lingüísticos modernos de Internet mediante la realización de un análisis lingüístico con estadísticas descriptivas de los estudiantes en la enseñanza a distancia. El análisis lingüístico reveló que la mayoría de los estudiantes utilizaban rasgos léxicos, ortográficos, paralingüísticos y gráficos cuando se comunicaban en una clase en línea. Se analizaron 452 mensajes, que contenían un corpus de 6.340 palabras, y se comprobó que sólo el 23,72% del corpus total presentaba rasgos léxicos, ortográficos, paralingüísticos y gráficos en el Instituto Tecnológico de Massachusetts, el 22,63% en la Universidad de Stanford, el 21,78% en la Universidad de Harvard, el 24,58% en el Instituto Tecnológico de California y el 22,76% en la Universidad de Oxford.
Descargas
Citas
ABUSA’ALEEK, A. Internet Linguistics: A Linguistic Analysis of Electronic Discourse as a New Variety of Language. International Journal of English Linguistics, Ontario, v. 5, n. 1, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n1p135
AKUJOBI, O. S.; EZE, B. I. A computer-mediated discourse analysis on undergraduates’ Facebook and WhatsApp. IGWEBUIKE: An African Journal of Arts and Humanities, Umunya, v. 7, n. 2, р. 228-247. 2021. Disponível em: https://acjol.org/index.php/iaajah/article/view/1281. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.
ALEKSANDROVA, O. V.; MENDZHERITSKAYA, E. O.; MALAKHOVA, V. L. Dynamic changes in modern English discourse. Training, Language and Culture, Moscow, v.1, n. 1, p. 92-106, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29366/2017tlc.1.1.6
AMOUSSOU, F.; AYODELE, A. A. Principles, Theories and Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), Ongole, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-18, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0601002
BARON, N. S. Discourse structures in instant messaging: The case of utterance breaks. Language @ Internet, Bloomington, v. 7, n. 4, 2010. Disponível em: https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2651. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.
BURSTON, J. Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, Lorraine, v. 27, n. 1, p. 4-20, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159
COLLOT, M.; BELMORE, N. Electronic Language: A new variety of English. In: HERRING, S. C. (ed.). Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996. p. 13-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.04col
CRYSTAL, D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164771
CRYSTAL, D. Txting: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2008.
DAVIS, B. H.; BREWER, J. P. Electronic discourse: Linguistic individuals in virtual space. Albany: SUNY Press, 1997.
FARINA, F.; LYDDY, F. The Language of Text Messaging: “Linguistic Ruin” or Resource? The Irish Psychologist, v. 37, n. 6, p. 145-149, 2011.
FU, Q.-K. Impacts of mobile technologies, systems and resources on language learning: A systematic review of selected journal publications from 2007-2016. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, Hong Kong, v. 10, n. 4, p. 375-388, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2018.10.023
GOLONKA, E. M.; BOWLES, A. R.; FRANK, V. M.; RICHARDSON, D. L.; FREYNIK, S. Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Antwerp, v. 27, n. 1, p. 70-105, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
GRADDOL, D. The Future of English?: A Guide to Forecasting the Popularity of the English Language in the 21st Century. London: British Council, 1997.
HASAN, F.; MUHAYYANG, M. The Linguistic Features Uniqueness of the Students’ Written Discourse in Online Learning. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, Makassar, v. 5, n. 1, p. 73-82, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v5i1.5777
HERRING, S. C. Two variants of an electronic message schema In: HERRING, S. C. (ed.). Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996. p. 81-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.08her
HEZILI, A. Communication from Formal Written Interaction to Media Written Interaction Chat. 2010. Thesis (Master’s in Applied Language Sciences) – Faculty of Letters and Languages, Mentouri University, Constantine, 2010. Disponível em: http://193.194.84.143/handle/123456789/11331?locale-attribute=ar. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.
HWANG, G.-J., SHI, Y.-R., CHU, H.-C. A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, Manchester, v. 42, n. 5, p. 778-789, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01102.x
KEMP, S. Digital 2019: Global digital overview. Datareportal, 2019. Disponível em: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-global-digital-overview. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.
LAI, C.-L.; HWANG, G.-J. High school teachers’ perspectives on applying different mobile learning strategies to science courses: the national mobile learning program in Taiwan. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, Geneva, v. 9, n. 2, p. 124-145, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2015.070704
LING, R. The Sociolinguistics of SMS: An Analysis of SMS Use by a Random Sample of Norwegians. In: LING, R.S.; PEDERSEN, P. E. (eds.). Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere. London: Springer, 2005. p. 335-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-248-9_22
LING, R.; BARON, N. S. Text Messaging and IM: Linguistic Comparison of American College Data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Santa Barbara, v. 26, n. 3, p. 291-298, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06303480
LYDDY, F.; FARINA, F.; HANNEY, J.; FARRELL, L.; O’NEILL, N. K. An Analysis of Language in University Students' Text Messages. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, Oxford, v. 19, n. 3, p. 546-561, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12045
MACFADYEN, L. P.; ROCHE, J.; DOFF, S. Communicating across cultures in cyberspace: A Bibliographical Review of Intercultural Communication Online. Münster: LIT Verlag, 2004.
PANCKHURST, R. Le discours électronique médié: bilan et perspectives. In: PIOLAT, A. Lire, écrire, communiquer et apprendre avec Internet. De Boeck Supérieur, 2006. p. 345-366.
POP, L. Ce qui reste des relations de discours en cyberl@ngue. Recherches ACLIF: Actes du Séminaire de Didactique Universitaire, n. 5, p. 130-144, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=45111. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.
SANDBERG, J.; MARIS, M.; GEUS, K. Mobile English learning: An evidence based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, Tempe, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1334-1347, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.015
Speedtest Global Index. Disponível em: https://www.speedtest.net/global-index. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.
SUN, H.-M. A study of the features of Internet English from the linguistic perspective. Studies in Literature and Language, Québec, v. 1, n. 7, p. 98-103, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
TAGLIAMONTE, S.; DENIS, D. Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, Durham, v. 83, n. 1, p. 3-34, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001
THE WORLD BANK GROUP. Disponível em: https://olc.worldbank.org/. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.
THURLOW, C.; BROWN, A. Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, v. 1, p. 1-27, 2003. Disponível em: http://faculty.washington.edu/thurlow/papers/Thurlow(2003)-DAOL.pdf. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.
UYSAL, M. P.; GAZIBEY, Y. E-Learning in Turkey: Developments and Applications. G. T. YAMAMOTO, U. DEMIRAY, M. VE KESIM (Editors). Ankara: Cem Web Offset, 2010.
VARNHAGEN, C. K.; MCFALL, G. P.; PUGH, N.; ROUTLEDGE, L.; SUMIDA-MACDONALD, H.; KWONG, T. E. Lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and Writing, College Station, v. 23, n. 6, p. 719-733, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9181-y
WERRY, C. C. Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In: HERRING, S. C. (ed.). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1996. p. 47-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.06wer
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Os manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista EntreLínguas. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
Transferência de direitos autorais – autorização para publicação
Caso o artigo submetido seja aprovado para publicação, já fica acordado que o(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a UNESP a reproduzi-lo e publicá-lo na EntreLínguas, entendendo-se os termos “reprodução” e “publicação” conforme definição respectivamente dos incisos VI e I do artigo 5° da Lei 9610/98. O artigo poderá ser acessado pela rede mundial de computadores (Internet), sendo permitidas, a título gratuito, a consulta e a reprodução de exemplar do artigo para uso próprio de quem a consulta, desde que haja a citação ao texto consultado. Essa autorização de publicação 328 EntreLínguas, Araraquara, v. 1, n .2, p. 323-328, jul./dez. 2015 não tem limitação de tempo, ficando a UNESP responsável pela manutenção da identificação do(s) autor(es) do artigo. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
