Physicality as a possible key to understanding human nature

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iEsp1.14885

Keywords:

Nature, Physicality, Body, Man, Sport, Doping, Entertainment, Social fact

Abstract

The statement about human nature is the subject of numerous discussions, which, however, does not negate the presence of the substrate of its origin, manifestations, specificity, and real dynamics in space and time. In the process of analysis, we find a lot of arguments that confirm this fact, as well as a decent number of counterarguments. In this article, a priori, we proceed from the validity of the existence of the term "human nature", recognizing its ambiguity. Of course, our stated physicality as an aspect of human nature does not exhaust the idea of his nature. The nominal division into soul, spirit, etc. gives us some methodological tools. No more than that. Physicality, in its turn, requires problematization. "Physicality "is a category that denotes what a given human body naturally becomes in the course of its social modifications, so this category can certainly not be considered outside of conjunction with another very important category - "spirituality". These concepts, as well as the phenomena they denote, are interrelated (MORGAN 2006). In our review, there are three main ways to interpret "Physicality". Firstly, it is the only factuality that initially claims the ontological status. Secondly, it is part of a harmonious whole that includes all non-corporeal things. I would like to focus on the third aspect, which includes at least three principles. Thirdly, physicality changes its seemingly simple "fate" dramatically, turning into a problem as a way of human existence. This can be interpreted "as a creative act of overcoming oneself". Only this overcoming of the present self presupposes a reliance on its relevance and reality. This ontologically conditioned event is always self-based. In this sense, the body as a creative phenomenon " never appears just by its own. Yet it is precisely overcoming that is the constitutive feature of human existence. A man is bigger than himself. We can say that the problem is a way of human existence. The problem in the most primitive form can be expressed as "I already want to, but I can't yet". Where does the desire come from if the object of desire (the desired situation) is not yet available? How can you want something that doesn't exist yet and never has? The man himself is a few steps ahead (BUBLIK, 2006). Human rationality is based not only on reflectivity, but also on the ability of a person to operate with ideas that do not have objective visibility (for example, the ultimate category of being). Thus, man proves his metaphysicality: "man's metaphysics expresses not only the presence of the supernatural dimension in man but also his ability to determine himself, to be his own creation". The main methods used in writing the article: the unity of historical and logical, the method of reflection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Zulfiya Z. Ibragimova, Kazan Federal University (KPFU), Kazan

Associate Professor of the Department of General philosophy of the Institute of social and philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications.

References

BOURDIEU, P. Kak mozhno byt' sportivnym bolel'shhikom? [How can I be a sports fan?]. Logos, n. 6, p. 99-113, 2009. Available: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/text/30790017.html. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

BUBLIK, P. I. Chelovekorazmernost' kak posil'nost' social'nogo opyta. [Human dimension as the power of social experience.] 2006. Available: http://netgorod.narod.ru/articls/Bublic_4elovekorazmernost.htm. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

ELIAS, N. The genesis of sport as a sociological problem. The sociology of sport: A selection of readings, p. 88-115, 1971.

GRIFFITH, J. Thinking descartes in conjunction, with merleau-ponty: the humanbody, the future, and historicity (original title: thinking descartes in conjunction, with merleau-ponty: the human body, the future, and historicity). Filozofia, v. 74, n. 2, p. 111-125, 2019. Available: http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/filozofia/?q=en/filozofia.2019.74.2.3. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

HUIZINGA, Y. V Teni zavtrashnego dnja. [In the shadow of tomorrow]. Available: http://booksonline.com.ua/review.php?book=157235. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

MAMARDASHVILI SENOKOSOV, M.Y. Strela poznanija. Nabrosok estestvennoistoricheskoj gnoseologii [The arrow of knowledge. Sketch of the natural history of epistemology] 2018. Available: https://books.google.ru. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

MAMARDASHVILI, M. K. Kartezianskie razmyshlenija [Cartesian reflections]. 2002.

MIHINA, F. Human nature: one of anthropological insolubilia? Filozofia, n. 4, p. 318-333, 2019.

MORGAN, W. Filosofija sporta Istoricheskij i konceptual'nyj obzor i ocenka ee budushhego. [Phylosophy of sports. Historical and conceptual review and assessment of its future] Moscow: Logos 3, 2006.

Philosophical readings. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-klastika. 2002. 832 p. [Electronic resource]. Available: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/philosoph/mm=phil_readings=ann.html#_Toc84078707. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

SAYKINA, G. K. The metaphysics of man as an area of “purified” humanity. Asian Social Science, v. 10, n. 21, p. 122-127, 2014. Available: http: // www. scopus.com/inward/record. url?eid=2-s2. 0-84908318595&partnerID=40&md5=538859c16d469506f1de3c8a82bdc0e3. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

SOKOLOV, B.G. «Dumaj!»: telo ["Think!": body] (2001) Series " Symposium”, Russian mass culture of the end of the XX century. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Philosophical Society, 2011. 156 p. Available: http://anthropology.ru/ru/text/sokolov-bg/dumay-telo. Access: 25 fev. 2020.2011.

ZARKA,Y.CH. Does the Concept of Human Nature Still Make Sense?(Original title: Má ešte pojem ľudská prirodzenosť zmysel?)Filozofia, 2018, v. 73, n. 10, p. 777-789, 2018. Available: http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/filozofia/?q=en/ma-este-pojem-ludska-prirodzenost-zmysel. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

ZINCHENKO, V. P.; PODOROGA, V. Psihologija na kacheljah mezhdu dushoj i telom. Fenomenologija telesnosti [Psychology on a swing between the soul and the body". "Phenomenology of corporeality]. About the human soul and flesh: from speeches at the scientific and practical conference in Moscow state University "Interdisciplinary problems of psychology of corporeality, 2004. [Electronic resource]. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-chelovecheskoy-dushe-i-ploti-iz-vystupleniy-na-nauchno-prakticheskoy-konferentsii-v-mosgu-mezhdistsiplinarnye-problemy-psihologii. Access: 25 fev. 2020.

Downloads

Published

28/02/2021

How to Cite

IBRAGIMOVA, Z. Z. Physicality as a possible key to understanding human nature. Revista EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 7, n. Esp1, p. 162–172, 2021. DOI: 10.29051/el.v7iEsp1.14885. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/14885. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2024.