Writings by philologists of the past as a basis for shaping linguistic personality of a modern teacher
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.2.15153Keywords:
Apollos, Grammar book, Discourse, Metaphor, ConceptAbstract
The objective of this article is to analyze Apollos’ linguistic personality and answer the question whether the linguistic personality of a priest-scholar, author of grammar writings, public figure of the 18th century can be exemplary during the formation of a modern educator’s linguistic personality. Methodology. To solve the declared problem, a comparative analysis of the modern Russian teacher and scholar of the past’s linguistic personality was done. This became possible due to the use of sociolinguistic methods – questionnaire survey and interview, as well as to the use of Yu. N. Karaulov method of analysis of linguistic personality, M.K. Petrov concept of sociocode and G. Lakoff cognitive metaphor theory. The main findings of the research: 1) it has revealed problems of modern education; 2) identified and described Apollos’ value orientations, transmitted to students; 3) formulated a scientific hypothesis: it is necessary to use the writings of linguists/philologists and educators of the past as a basis for the formation of linguistic personality of a modern educator, tutor, mentor, facilitator because linguistic personality of previous centuries’ scholars and methodologists can be recognized as a model linguistic personality for a teacher of Russian language and literature. Application of research findings. The research findings can be introduced to a number of academic disciplines such as “Educator’s professional personality”, “Sociolinguistics”, “Cultural linguistics”, “Communicative-speech training”, “Academic eloquence”, “Genres of academic discourse”, “Stylistics”, “Russian language in the sociolinguistic aspect”, “Sociolinguistic foundations of communication”, etc.), they will also be essential in developing continuing (lifelong) education courses for teaching staff specializing in “Linguistic personality of a tutor: history and contemporaneity”. The novelty and originality of this research stems from the fact that 1) the analysis of pedagogical discourse was carried out in two time slices – year of 2019 and 18th century, that allowed to reveal the specificity of a Russian language and literature teacher’s linguistic personality in synchrony and diachrony, 2) Apollos’ grammar was for the first time explored within the anthropocentric paradigm, 3) the prospects for further study are seen in taking from the best of the past philology to the matrix of modern education.
Downloads
References
BAIBAKOV, A. D. Grammar book, that guides to the perception of Slavonic-Russian language. Kiev: Kiev-Pechersk Lavra Publ., 1974. (APOLLOS)
ARISKINA, O. Formation of value orientations in modern education on the axiological basis of 16-18th centuries grammars. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 214, p. 825-832, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.730
ARISKINA, O. L. Linguistic personality of E.B. Syreishchikov. Russian language in secondary school, v. 10, p. 40-46, 2012.
ARISKINA, O. L. Linguistic personality of scholars of Catherine the Great epoch: analysis of the verbal and semantic level. In: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE DEDICATED TO THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY SINCE THE BIRTH OF A.I. SOLZHENITSYN, 4., 2018, Saransk. Proceedings […]. Saransk, Russia: National Research Mordovian State University named after N.P. Ogarev, 2019. p. 21-27.
ARISKINA, O. L.; DRYANGINA E. A. Expressiveness in the structure of the teacher's linguistic personality (a case study of K.D. Ushinsky). Revista Inclusiones, v. 7, n. esp., p. 153-165, 2020.
ARISKINA, O. L.; DRYANGINA, E. A. Linguistic and communicative personality: various approaches to research. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, v. 25, n. 240, p. 15-18, 2011a.
ARISKINA, O. L.; DRYANGINA, E. A. Linguistic personality of the first Slavic grammarians (based on grammar books by Lavrentiy Zizania and Meletiy Smotritsky). Polythematic network electronic journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, v. 71, p. 720-734, 2011b.
ARISKINA, O. L.; PULOV, E. V. Terminological metaphors in V. A. Bogoroditsky’s scientific discourse. Revista Inclusiones, v. 7, n. esp., p. 52-62, 2020.
ARISKINA, O. L.; PULOV, E. V.; NESKIN, Y. A. Concepts "Power" and "People" in the political discourse of G.A. Zyuganov. In: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, 16., 2016, Orekhovo-Zuyevo. Proceedings […]. Moscow, Russia: Institute of Linguistics; Orekhovo-Zuyevo: Moscow State Regional Humanitarian and Technological University, 2016. p. 96-98.
ARISKINA, O. L.; YURINA, N. G. Features of the linguistic personality of V.S. Solovyov-publicist (on material of his speech "Three forces"). Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, v. 25, n. 5, p. 39-50, 2020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3984201
AUSTIN, J. L. How to do things with words: the william james lectures delivered at harvard university in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
BARANOV, M. T. (Ed.). Metodika prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka: ucheb. Posobie dlya studentov Ped. In-tov po spets. No. 2101 “Rus. yaz. i lit.” [Methodology of teaching the Russian language: teaching guide for students of the pedagogical institute in the specialty No. 2101 "Russian language and literature"]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1990. 368 p.
BASSO, E. B. Native Latin American cultures through their discourse. Bloomington: Folklore Institute, Indiana University, 1990.
BELL, A. Approaches to media discourse. London: Sage, 2001.
BESPAMYATNOVA, G. N. Linguistic personality of a TV presenter within the framework of a rhetorical ethos (game programs case): Summary of PhD thesis in philology. Yekaterinburg: Publishing house of the Ural University, 2002. 20 p.
BOLDYREV, N. N. On dominating principle of knowledge representation and meaning construction in discourse. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEANING AND KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION, 7., 2018, Dublin. Proceedings […]. Dublin, Ireland: Book of abstracts, 2018.
BOLDYREV, N. N.; DUBROVSKAYA, O. G. Sociocultural specificity of discourse: the interpretive approach to language use. Procedia - Behavioral Sciences, v. 236, p. 59-64, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.12.019
BRAGINA, N. G.; SHARONOV, I. A. "Pedagogical" aggression in Russian everyday communication. Russian Journal of Linguistics, v. 4, p. 975-993, 2019.
BROEK, V. D. P.; HELDER, A. Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: passive processes, reader-initiated processes, and evolving mental representations. Discourse Processes, v. 54, n. 5-6, p. 360–372, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1306677
BROWN, P.; LEVINSON, S. Politeness: Some universals in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
CHERNYAVSKAYA, V. E. The Discourse of power and the power of discourse: problems of speech manipulation: study guide. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2006.
COCKERILL, А. Values education in the Soviet State: The lasting contribution of V.A. Sukhomlinsky. International Journal of Educational Research, v. 50, n. 3, p. 198-204, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.07.005
DIJK, V. T. A. Elite discourse and racism. London: Sage Publications, 1993.
DIJK, V. T. A. News as discourse. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1988.
DIJK, V. T. A. Prejudice in discourse: an analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1984.
DRYANGINA, E. A. Formation of teacher’s linguistic personality revisited. In: Culture of speech and business communication: proceedings of science workshop. Saransk, Russia: Krasnyi Oktybr Publ., 2008. p. 101-104.
DRYANGINA, E. A. Osobennosti proyavleniya lingvokognitivnogo urovnya yazykovoi lichnosti K.D. Ushinskogo kak avtora rabot “O pervonachalnom prepodavanii russkogo yazyka” i “Rodnoe slovo” [Features of the manifestation of the linguo-cognitive level of linguistic personality K.D. Ushinskii as the author of the works "On the initial teaching of Russian language" and "Native word"]. Politematicheskii setevoi elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Polythematic network electronic scientific journal of Kuban State Agrarian University], v. 91, p. 1770-1779, 2013.
ELOKHOVA, G. V. The professional language personality of a future engineer: theoretical aspect. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki [Issues of cognitive linguistics], v. 1, n. 46, p. 117-120, 2016.
FILIPPOVA, O. V. Individualnyi stil rechi uchitelya kak kategoriya pedagogicheskoi ritoriki [Individual style of a teacher's speech as a category of pedagogical rhetoric]. Moscow: Prometei, 2001. 148 p.
FILIPPOVA, O. V. Sodeistvuyushchaya strategiya i yazykovaya lichnost uchitelya-filologa [Supporting strategy and linguistic personality of a teacher-philologist]. Nauchnyi zhurnal KubGAU [Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University], v. 7, n. 81, p. 1-12, 2012.
FROLOVA, S. L. Vospitatelnyi potentsial distsipliny “Russkii yazyk i kultura rechi” i ego rol v formirovanii professionalnogo ideala studentov [Educational potential of the discipline "Russian language and culture of speech" and its role in forming professional ideal of students]. Russkii yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school], v. 8, p. 69-72, 2009.
GASPAROV, B. M. Language, memory, image. Linguistics of language existence. Moscow: New literary review Publ., 1996.
GRICE, P. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
GRINEV, S. V. On lexical aspects of language evolution. fundamental and actual in language development: categories, factors, mechanisms. In: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE–SCHOOL NAMED AFTER L.M. SKRELINA, 18., 2017, Мoscow. Proceedings […]. Moscow, Russia: MPGU, 2017.
GUMPERZ, J. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
JOHNSON, E. J. Exposing gaps in/between discourses of linguistic deficits. International Multilingual Research Journal, v. 11, n. 1, p. 5-22, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2016.1258185
KAN-KALIK, V. A. Uchitelyu o pedagogicheskom obshchenii: kn. dlya uchitelya [To a teacher on pedagogical communication: Book for a teacher]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1987. 190 p.
KARASIK, V. I. Communicative approach to the study of pedagogical discourse. Russian language abroad, v. 5, n. 264, p. 4-8, 2017.
KARASIK, V. I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: identity, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. 477 p.
KARAULOV, Y. N. Russian language and linguistic personality. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1987.
KOBYAKOVA, G. N. Rechevaya agressiya uchitelya v sovremennoi shkole [Speech aggression of a teacher in a modern school]. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta imeni A.P. Chekhova [Bulletin of Anton Chekhov Taganrog State Institute], v. 2, p. 24-28, 2012.
KRYSIN, L. P. Modern Russian intelligentsia: an attempt at speech analysis. Russian language in scientific coverage, v. 1, p. 90-107, 2001.
LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2004.
LEVITAN, K. M.; MEDVEDEVA, L. G. The Formation of a Professional Linguistic Personality of a Law Student in the Learning Environment of a Higher Educational Institution. Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, v. 154, p. 305-308, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.168
LEVITAN, K. M.; YUGOVA, M. A. Forming an innovative professional linguistic personality of law school students on the basis of the synergetic approach. Language and culture, v. 46, p. 167-183, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/19996195/46/10
MARTISHINA, N. V. Tsennostnyi komponent tvorcheskogo potentsiala lichnosti [Value component of the creative potential of personality]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy], v. 3, p. 48-57, 2006.
MENKOVA, N. N. Linguistic personality of a writer as a source of speech characteristics of characters: based on B. Akunin works. Moscow City Pedagogical University, Moscow, 2004.
MILOVANOVA, Z. H. V. Genre-speech specifics of pedagogical discourse. Volgograd: Peremena Publ., 1998. p. 63-64.
PETROV, M. K. Language, sign, culture. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 2004.
PULINX, R. Silencing linguistic diversity: the extent, the determinants and consequences of the monolingual beliefs of Flemish teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 20, n. 5, p. 542-556, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1102860
PULOV, E. V. Metaphorization of scientific discourse of the first half of the XX century (based on linguistic writings by L.V. Shcherba, V.A. Bogoroditsky, N.V. Krushevsky, I.A. Baudouin de Courtenay). Philological Sciences. Issues of theory and practice, v. 12-1, n. 78, p. 144-147, 2017.
QIU, L. et al. Personality expression in Chinese language use. International Journal of Psychology, v. 56, n. 6, p. 463-472, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12259
SHCHERBININA, Y. V. Pedagogicheskii diskurs: myslit – govorit – deistvovat: ucheb. posobie [Pedagogical discourse: think - speak - act: a textbook]. Moscow: Flinta, 2010. 440 p.
SHEVCHENKO, O. N. Language personality of a translator: case of B.V. Zakhoder's discourse. Volgograd State Pedagogical University, Volgograd, 2005.
SHILINA, S. A. Linguistic personality of Ivan IV: based on documents of the XVI-XVII centuries. Bryansk State University, Bryansk, 2003.
SIVTSOVA, N. V.; ARISKINA, O. L. Linguistic means of expressing knowledge in the lectures delivered by M.M. Bakhtin. Polythematic network electronic journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, v. 91, p. 1759-1769, 2013.
STOLYAROVA, E.; FEDOTOVA, M. Professional language personality of specialists in the field of human resources management and teaching foreign languages for specific purposes. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, v. 5, p. 127-133, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2017-5-127-133
TUPITSYNA, I. N. Lexico-semantic aspects of entrepreneur’s speech image in oral business discourse. Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, 2000.
USHAKOV, K. M. Risks within the industrialization context. Journal of the Siberian Federal University, v. 11, n. 2, p. 325-327, 2018.
VALEEVA, A. F. et al. Categoriality as a form of expressiveness: expressive speech in tatar and French. Opcion, v. 34, n. 15 esp., p. 1245-1264, 2018.
VORONOVA, N. G. Tip Yazykovoi sposobnosti A. S. Makarenko [Type of language ability A. S. Makarenko]. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya [World of science, culture, education], v. 4, n. 47, p. 247-249, 2014.
VOROZHBITOVA, A. A. Sinergeticheskii aspekt vuzovskogo obrazovaniya v svete lingvoritoricheskogo podkhoda [Synergetic aspect of university education in terms of linguistic-rhetoric approach]. Alma mater. Vestnik vysshei shkoly [Alma mater. Bulletin of higher education], v. 2, p. 22-27, 1999.
YURYEVA, A. V. Lingvoritoricheskii ideal kak faktor stanovleniya professionalnoi yazykovoi lichnosti budushchego uchitelya [Linguistic-rhetoric ideal as a factor of formation of the professional linguistic personality of a future teacher]. 2002. 234 f. Thesis (Ph.D. in Pedagogical Sciences) – Sochi State University of Tourism and Resort Business, Sochi, 2002.
ZHELTUKHINA, M. R. (Ed.). Man and his discourse - 4: collective monograph. Moscow: IL RAS, JSC Azbukovnik Publ., 2014.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista EntreLínguas. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
Transferência de direitos autorais – autorização para publicação
Caso o artigo submetido seja aprovado para publicação, já fica acordado que o(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a UNESP a reproduzi-lo e publicá-lo na EntreLínguas, entendendo-se os termos “reprodução” e “publicação” conforme definição respectivamente dos incisos VI e I do artigo 5° da Lei 9610/98. O artigo poderá ser acessado pela rede mundial de computadores (Internet), sendo permitidas, a título gratuito, a consulta e a reprodução de exemplar do artigo para uso próprio de quem a consulta, desde que haja a citação ao texto consultado. Essa autorização de publicação 328 EntreLínguas, Araraquara, v. 1, n .2, p. 323-328, jul./dez. 2015 não tem limitação de tempo, ficando a UNESP responsável pela manutenção da identificação do(s) autor(es) do artigo. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.