El uso de formas interactivas y métodos de enfoque de lectura sintópica en el aula de la escuela secundaria de idioma inglés

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.4.15665

Palabras clave:

Colegio, Pensamiento crítico, Habilidades de pensamiento, Estrategias de lectura, Sistema de ejercicios

Resumen

Este artículo tiene como objetivo investigar el uso de las formas interactivas y los métodos del enfoque de lectura sintópica en el aula de la escuela superior de inglés para mejorar las habilidades cognitivas y la competencia de los estudiantes en lectura, así como para desarrollar el pensamiento crítico. Mientras que la lectura analítica involucra principalmente las actividades de los estudiantes, como la argumentación, el análisis y la evaluación de un texto determinado a través de la búsqueda de ejemplos en el mismo texto, la lectura sintópica desarrolla el pensamiento crítico siempre que se concentre en las habilidades de los estudiantes para comparar. y contrastar diferentes textos que tratan de un mismo tema, para expresar ideas sofisticadas, para integrar o sintetizar las ideas de múltiples fuentes y para formular argumentos originales. Los objetivos del artículo son determinar las etapas del proceso de aprendizaje descrito, la estructura de cada etapa propuesta y desarrollar el correspondiente sistema de ejercicios para el dominio de las competencias mencionadas y desarrollar el pensamiento crítico en los estudiantes. La investigación extrae implicaciones pedagógicas para el aula de una escuela superior de inglés, lo que sugiere que los profesores de idiomas emplean la enseñanza explícita de estrategias de lectura que facilitan la lectura crítica y desarrollan habilidades de pensamiento crítico.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Lyubov Marymonska, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv

Assistant Professor. Department of Methods of Teaching Ukrainian and Foreign Languages and Literature.

Vira Ponomarova, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv

Ph.D in Pedagogy, Associate Professor. Department of Methods of Teaching Ukrainian and Foreign Languages and Literature.

Liudmyla Byrkun, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv

Ph.D in Philology, Professor. Department of Methods of Teaching Ukrainian and Foreign Languages and Literature.

Citas

ADLER, M. J.; DOREN C. V. How to read a book. New York: Touchstone. 1997.

AKBULUT, F. D. A bibliometric analysis of lexical bundles usage in native and non-native academic writing. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1146-1166. 2020.

ALTIN, M.; SARACALOĞLU, A. S. Effect of reading comprehension instruction enriched with cultural materials on English learning. Cogent Education, 5(1), 2018. Article number 1475589.

BAKAR, S. Z. S. A.; YUSOF, F. H. M.; AMAT, D. W.; SARIJARI, H.; SUMERY, Z.; OTHMAN, D. ESL classroom reading lessons: Online VS blended. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(3), 104-114. 2019.

BLOOM, B.; ENGLEHART, M.; FURST, E.; HILL, W.; KRATHWOHL, D. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green. 1956.

BOARDMAN, A. G.; BOELÉ, A. L.; KLINGNER, J. K. Strategy instruction shifts teacher and Student interactions during text-based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 175-195. 2018.

BREVIK, L. M. Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281-2310. 2019.

BYRKUN, L. V. Provision for education and teaching foreign languages in schools of academic type. Visnyk of the Kyiv National Linguistic University (KNLU). Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 32, 205-213. 2019.

CATTO, S. More than one voice: Utilizing students’ home languages and cultural EXPERIENCES in reading recovery. Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, Volume 8. 2017.

DAVIS, M. H.; MCPARTLAND, J. M.; PRYSESKI, C.; KIM, E. The effects of coaching on English teachers’ reading instruction practices and adolescent students’ reading comprehension. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(3), 255-275. 2018.

DENISENKO, M.; OSIDAK, V.; YAREMENKO, Y. Tales, legends, myths, parables, sayings, fables: texts and tasks for the development of oral and written skills. Kyiv: Wolf. 2007.

FOSTER, T. C. How to read literature. New York: Harper Perennial. 2017.

GUNAWARDENA, M.; SOORIYAMPOLA, M.; WALISUNDARA, N. Scaffolding thinking in ESL lessons: Negotiating challenges. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 279-285. 2017.

HARRIS, D. H. Critical thinking strategies for intelligence analysis. 2016. Disponível em: https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/35820/InTech-Critical_thinking_ skills_for_intelligence_analysis.pdf.

HEUER, R. Psychology of intelligence analysis. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence. 1999. Disponível em: http://www.cia.gov/csi/books/19104/art1.html.

KAVYTSKA, T.; KVASOVA, O.; OSIDAK, V. Development of critical thinking to enhance grammar learning. Naukovi Zapysky of Mykhailo Drahomanov Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University: Pedagogy and Psychology, 62, 20-30. 2020.

KLEIN, G. Critical thoughts about critical thinking. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 12(3), 210-224. 2011.

MARYMONSKA, L. A. Strategy for learning to read English texts of pupils of specialist humanities high school in Ukraine. Comparative Studies of Slavic Languages and Literatures. TSNUK, 26, 63-69. 2014.

MOSENKIS, I.; LUKIANYK, L.; STROKAL, O.; PONOMAROVA, V.; MYKHAILIUK, H. Application of cloud educational technologies for teacher competence development. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 289-303. 2020.

MURAVEVA, E. V.; ELICES AGUDO, J. F. Dystopian science fiction as a means of teaching English to technical degree students. Integration of Education, 21(2), 303-321. 2017.

O'CONNOR, R. E.; SANCHEZ, V.; BEACH, K. D.; BOCIAN, K. M. Special education teachers integrating reading with eighth grade U.S. history content. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32(2), 99-111. 2017.

PONOMAROVA, V.; GANDZURA, L. Peculiarities of teaching English to the first-year students with its specialism in the multilevel groups. Bulletin of ChNPU, 156, 39-44. 2018.

SCRIVEN, M. Reasoning. London: EdgePress. 1976.

SWAMINATHAN, S.; SCHELLENBERG, E. G.; VENKATESAN, K. Explaining the association between music training and reading in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(6), 992-999. 2018.

TOSTE, J. R.; CAPIN, P.; WILLIAMS, K. J.; CHO, E.; VAUGHN, S. Replication of an experimental study investigating the efficacy of a multisyllabic word reading intervention with and without motivational beliefs training for struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(1), 45-58. 2019.

YILDIRIM, F. Ç. Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 1032-1042. 2020.

ZHANG, Y.; CHEN, P.; YU, T. Reading and writing learning strategies for low English proficiency students at a private university in China. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 214-225. 2019.

Publicado

10/11/2021

Cómo citar

MARYMONSKA, L.; PONOMAROVA, V.; BYRKUN, L. El uso de formas interactivas y métodos de enfoque de lectura sintópica en el aula de la escuela secundaria de idioma inglés. Revista EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 7, n. esp.4, p. e021107, 2021. DOI: 10.29051/el.v7iesp.4.15665. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/15665. Acesso em: 25 dic. 2025.

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.