Tecnologias da informação e comunicações a distância na avaliação dos resultados de aprendizagem em estudantes de linguística

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v8iesp.1.16914

Palavras-chave:

Avaliação pedagógica, Ensino à distância, Tecnologias de ensino a distância, Teste de distância. Competência digital

Resumo

O objetivo do estudo é encontrar as condições ideais para o uso de tecnologias digitais para avaliar os resultados da aprendizagem e a qualidade dos serviços educacionais. O artigo apresenta os resultados de um estudo empírico (uma pesquisa online anônima) sobre a atitude de professores e alunos de três universidades russas em relação à avaliação pedagógica usando tecnologias a distância. Os ambientes educacionais das instituições de ensino superior de diferentes universidades têm conquistas na ativação do uso de tecnologias eletrônicas e a demanda por seu desenvolvimento na avaliação pedagógica dos resultados de aprendizagem permanece. Os principais problemas que dificultam o processo de introdução da avaliação remota dos resultados do ensino de linguistas com recurso às TIC são a falta de pessoal altamente qualificado; nível insuficiente de prontidão dos sujeitos do processo educativo para essa forma de controle; dificuldade em formar grupos de projetos para o desenvolvimento de testes educacionais; feedback fraco e motivação insuficiente entre professores e alunos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Amina Bestaevna Satkeeva, State Agrarian University of the Northern Trans-Urals, Tyumen – Russia

Professor

Kapitolina Leonidovna Ulanova, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), Moscow – Russia

Accociate Professor

Natalia Yurjevna Filistova, Surgut State University (SSU), Surgut – Russia

Accociate Professor

Elena Grigorievna Galizina, Russian University of Transport (RUT), Moscow – Russia

Accociate Professor

Elena Viktorovna Fedotkina, Russian University of Transport (RUT), Moscow – Russia

Accociate Professor

Referências

AFANASIEV, I. V. et al. The use of cloud resources and services in distance learning of students in the context of restrictions caused by the pandemic. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16103, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/download/16103/11973/. Access in: 18 Mar. 2021.

AL-SHOLI, H. Y. et al. An agile educational framework: A response for the Covid-19 pandemic. Cogent Education, v. 8, n. 1, 1980939, 2021. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1980939. Access in: 12 Aug. 2021.

ALLO, M. D. Is the online learning good in the midst of Covid-19 pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2020. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340815846_Is_the_online_learning_good_in_the_midst_of_Covid-19_Pandemic_The_case_of_EFL_learners. Access in: 13 July 2021.

ARIOVICH, L. et al. The assessment profession in higher education: A snapshot of perceptions, roles, and activities. Assessment Update, v. 31, n. 3, p. 10-12, 2019. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333668834_The_Assessment_Profession_in_Higher_Education_A_Snapshot_of_Perceptions_Roles_and_Activities. Access in: 17 Sept. 2021.

BENNETT, S. et al. How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 48, n. 2, p. 672-682, 2016. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301281257_How_technology_shapes_assessment_design_Findings_from_a_study_of_university_teachers_How_technology_shapes_assessment_design. Access in: 12 July 2021.

BLACK, P.; WILIAM, D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational assessment. Evaluation and Accountability, v. 21, n. 1, p. 5–31, 2009. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225590759_Developing_the_theory_of_formative_assessment. Access in: 11 July 2021.

BOUD, D.; SOLER, R. Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 41, n. 3, p. 400-413, 2016. Available in: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/43261/4/320AD1B3-686A-46C1-8506-BDB33C8EF875%20am.pdf. Access in: 16 June 2021.

CRISP, G.; GUÀRDIA, L.; HILLIER, M. Using e-Assessment to enhance student learning and evidence learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-3, 2016. Available in: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s41239-016-0020-3.pdf. Access in: 14 June 2021.

CRISP, V.; WARD, C. The development of a formative scenario-based computer assisted assessment tool in psychology for teachers: The PePCAA project. Computers and Education, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1509–1526, 2008. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131507000188. Access in: 12 June 2021.

DANN, R. Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, v. 21, n. 2, p. 149-166, 2014. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128. Access in: 03 July 2021.

DARLING-HAMMOND, L. Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, v. 57, n. 2, p. 120-138, 2006. Available in: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022487105283796. Access in: 07 Aug. 2021.

DEELEY, S. J. Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 43, n. 3, p. 439-448, 2018. Available in: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Effective+AND+learning&pg=3&id=EJ1172318. Access in: 09 June 2021.

DOPPER, S. M.; SJOER, E. Implementing formative assessment in engineering education: The use of the online assessment system Etude. European Journal of Engineering Education, v. 29, n. 2, p. 259–266, 2004. Available in: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ940429. Access in: 03 June 2021.

EFREMOVA, N. F. Formirovanie i otsenivanie kompetentsii v obrazovanii. Rostov-on-Don: Arkol, 2010.

ELISEEV, I. N. Metodologiya otsenki urovnya kompetentsii studenta. Russia: Informatika i obrazovanie, 2012.

GIKANDI, J. W.; MORROW, D.; DAVIS, N. E. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, v. 57, n. 4, p. 2333–2351, 2011. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511001333. Access in: 09 June 2021.

GLEBOV, V. A. et al. Distance learning in the humanitarian field amid the Coronavirus pandemic: Risks of creating barriers and innovative benefits. Propositos y Representaciones, v. 9, n. 3, e1258, 2021. Available in: https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1258. Access in: 04 June 2021.

GOLUBEVA, T. I. et al. The impact of visualization tools in distance English language learning: The experience of the Russian university teachers. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16111, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/16111. Access in: 20 June 2021.

HORST, S. J.; AMES, A. J. Bringing together assessment and learning improvement: Dreaming big for an inaugural summit. Research and Practice in Assessment, v. 13, p. 6-10, 2018. Available in: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1206335.pdf. Access in: 09 June 2021.

ILINA, I. Y. et al. Transformation of university teachers’ working and employment conditions in the period of distance learning: Socio-psychological aspects and risk assessment. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16165, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/16165/12017. Access in: 12 Apr. 2021.

KHARE, A.; LAM, H. Assessing student achievement and progress with online examinations: Some pedagogical and technical issues. International Journal on E-Learning, v. 7, n. 3, p. 383–402, 2008. Available in: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ800994. Access in: 03 Aug. 2021.

KIELY, R. Small answers to the big question: Learning from language program evaluation. Language Teaching Research, v. 13, n. 1, p. 99-116, 2009. Available in: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362168808095525. Access in: 16 Aug. 2021.

MISHCHENKO, I. K. Ob obektivnosti otsenki znanii studentov. Russia: Vestnik altaiskoi nauki, 2014.

RAPANTA, C. et al. Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, v. 2, p. 923–945, 2020. Available in: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y. Access in: 29 June 2021.

VRAZHNOVA, M. N.; ANASTASOV, M. S.; NIKIPORETS-TAKIGAWA, G. Y. Impact of professional self-improvement on the effectiveness of teachers in distance education. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16159, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/16159. Access in: 18 July 2021.

Publicado

30/03/2022

Como Citar

SATKEEVA, A. B. .; ULANOVA, K. L.; FILISTOVA, N. Y.; GALIZINA, E. G.; FEDOTKINA, E. V. Tecnologias da informação e comunicações a distância na avaliação dos resultados de aprendizagem em estudantes de linguística. Revista EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 8, n. esp.1, p. e022004, 2022. DOI: 10.29051/el.v8iesp.1.16914. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/16914. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos Semelhantes

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.