Information and communications technology in distance assessment of learning outcomes in linguistics students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v8iesp.1.16914Keywords:
Pedagogical assessment, Distance learning, Distance learning technologies, Distance testing, Digital competenceAbstract
The purpose of the study is to find the optimal conditions for using digital technologies to evaluate learning outcomes and the quality of educational services. The article presents the results of an empirical study (an anonymous online survey) of the attitude of teachers and students in three Russian universities to pedagogical assessment using distance technologies. The educational environments of higher education institutions of different universities have achievements in activating the use of e-technologies and demand for their development in the pedagogical assessment of learning outcomes remains. The main problems hindering the process of introducing remote assessment of the results of teaching linguists using ICT are the lack of highly qualified personnel; insufficient level of readiness of subjects of the educational process for this form of control; difficulty in forming project groups for the development of educational tests; weak feedback and insufficient motivation among teachers and students.
Downloads
References
AFANASIEV, I. V. et al. The use of cloud resources and services in distance learning of students in the context of restrictions caused by the pandemic. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16103, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/download/16103/11973/. Access in: 18 Mar. 2021.
AL-SHOLI, H. Y. et al. An agile educational framework: A response for the Covid-19 pandemic. Cogent Education, v. 8, n. 1, 1980939, 2021. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1980939. Access in: 12 Aug. 2021.
ALLO, M. D. Is the online learning good in the midst of Covid-19 pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2020. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340815846_Is_the_online_learning_good_in_the_midst_of_Covid-19_Pandemic_The_case_of_EFL_learners. Access in: 13 July 2021.
ARIOVICH, L. et al. The assessment profession in higher education: A snapshot of perceptions, roles, and activities. Assessment Update, v. 31, n. 3, p. 10-12, 2019. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333668834_The_Assessment_Profession_in_Higher_Education_A_Snapshot_of_Perceptions_Roles_and_Activities. Access in: 17 Sept. 2021.
BENNETT, S. et al. How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 48, n. 2, p. 672-682, 2016. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301281257_How_technology_shapes_assessment_design_Findings_from_a_study_of_university_teachers_How_technology_shapes_assessment_design. Access in: 12 July 2021.
BLACK, P.; WILIAM, D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational assessment. Evaluation and Accountability, v. 21, n. 1, p. 5–31, 2009. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225590759_Developing_the_theory_of_formative_assessment. Access in: 11 July 2021.
BOUD, D.; SOLER, R. Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 41, n. 3, p. 400-413, 2016. Available in: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/43261/4/320AD1B3-686A-46C1-8506-BDB33C8EF875%20am.pdf. Access in: 16 June 2021.
CRISP, G.; GUÀRDIA, L.; HILLIER, M. Using e-Assessment to enhance student learning and evidence learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-3, 2016. Available in: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s41239-016-0020-3.pdf. Access in: 14 June 2021.
CRISP, V.; WARD, C. The development of a formative scenario-based computer assisted assessment tool in psychology for teachers: The PePCAA project. Computers and Education, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1509–1526, 2008. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131507000188. Access in: 12 June 2021.
DANN, R. Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, v. 21, n. 2, p. 149-166, 2014. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128. Access in: 03 July 2021.
DARLING-HAMMOND, L. Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, v. 57, n. 2, p. 120-138, 2006. Available in: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022487105283796. Access in: 07 Aug. 2021.
DEELEY, S. J. Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 43, n. 3, p. 439-448, 2018. Available in: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Effective+AND+learning&pg=3&id=EJ1172318. Access in: 09 June 2021.
DOPPER, S. M.; SJOER, E. Implementing formative assessment in engineering education: The use of the online assessment system Etude. European Journal of Engineering Education, v. 29, n. 2, p. 259–266, 2004. Available in: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ940429. Access in: 03 June 2021.
EFREMOVA, N. F. Formirovanie i otsenivanie kompetentsii v obrazovanii. Rostov-on-Don: Arkol, 2010.
ELISEEV, I. N. Metodologiya otsenki urovnya kompetentsii studenta. Russia: Informatika i obrazovanie, 2012.
GIKANDI, J. W.; MORROW, D.; DAVIS, N. E. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, v. 57, n. 4, p. 2333–2351, 2011. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511001333. Access in: 09 June 2021.
GLEBOV, V. A. et al. Distance learning in the humanitarian field amid the Coronavirus pandemic: Risks of creating barriers and innovative benefits. Propositos y Representaciones, v. 9, n. 3, e1258, 2021. Available in: https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1258. Access in: 04 June 2021.
GOLUBEVA, T. I. et al. The impact of visualization tools in distance English language learning: The experience of the Russian university teachers. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16111, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/16111. Access in: 20 June 2021.
HORST, S. J.; AMES, A. J. Bringing together assessment and learning improvement: Dreaming big for an inaugural summit. Research and Practice in Assessment, v. 13, p. 6-10, 2018. Available in: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1206335.pdf. Access in: 09 June 2021.
ILINA, I. Y. et al. Transformation of university teachers’ working and employment conditions in the period of distance learning: Socio-psychological aspects and risk assessment. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16165, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/16165/12017. Access in: 12 Apr. 2021.
KHARE, A.; LAM, H. Assessing student achievement and progress with online examinations: Some pedagogical and technical issues. International Journal on E-Learning, v. 7, n. 3, p. 383–402, 2008. Available in: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ800994. Access in: 03 Aug. 2021.
KIELY, R. Small answers to the big question: Learning from language program evaluation. Language Teaching Research, v. 13, n. 1, p. 99-116, 2009. Available in: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362168808095525. Access in: 16 Aug. 2021.
MISHCHENKO, I. K. Ob obektivnosti otsenki znanii studentov. Russia: Vestnik altaiskoi nauki, 2014.
RAPANTA, C. et al. Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, v. 2, p. 923–945, 2020. Available in: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y. Access in: 29 June 2021.
VRAZHNOVA, M. N.; ANASTASOV, M. S.; NIKIPORETS-TAKIGAWA, G. Y. Impact of professional self-improvement on the effectiveness of teachers in distance education. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16159, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/16159. Access in: 18 July 2021.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista EntreLínguas. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
Transferência de direitos autorais – autorização para publicação
Caso o artigo submetido seja aprovado para publicação, já fica acordado que o(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a UNESP a reproduzi-lo e publicá-lo na EntreLínguas, entendendo-se os termos “reprodução” e “publicação” conforme definição respectivamente dos incisos VI e I do artigo 5° da Lei 9610/98. O artigo poderá ser acessado pela rede mundial de computadores (Internet), sendo permitidas, a título gratuito, a consulta e a reprodução de exemplar do artigo para uso próprio de quem a consulta, desde que haja a citação ao texto consultado. Essa autorização de publicação 328 EntreLínguas, Araraquara, v. 1, n .2, p. 323-328, jul./dez. 2015 não tem limitação de tempo, ficando a UNESP responsável pela manutenção da identificação do(s) autor(es) do artigo. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
