Cognitive errors and ways of their overcoming in teaching russian as a foreign languag

Alla Dmitriyevna Kulik; Sergey Andreyevich Vishnyakov; Nasrudin Magomedovich Alkhanov

doi:10.29051/el.v7iesp.5.16023

Authors

Alla Dmitriyevna Kulik People’s Friendship University of Russian (RUDN University), Moscow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1545-641X
Sergey Andreyevich Vishnyakov Moscow State Pedagogical University (MPGU), Moscow – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4975-9766
Nasrudin Magomedovich Alkhanov Chechen State University named after Akhmat Abdulkhamidovich Kadyrov, Grozny – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-8729

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.5.16023

Keywords:

Cognitive linguistics, Linguocultural world picture, eaching Russian as a foreign language, Linguoculturology approach

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of cognitive perception errors in teaching Russian as a foreign language among students of an internationally oriented university. The purpose of the article is to identify and level out errors in the perception of linguoculturology information as a Russian world picture in foreign students’ groups. The methodological base of the article consists of linguistic and communicative approaches. The author of the article conducted an empirical study in foreign students’ groups, during which definite cognitive errors were revealed. Based on the study results, the author made the following conclusions: in the process of teaching Russian language cognitive errors in the perception of linguoculturology information, that are local in nature, have a cumulative effect and lead to the cognitive errors emergence on a global level. In this regard, among international students of an internationally-oriented university an integrated approach is needed to overcome cognitive perception errors in the process of teaching Russian as a foreign language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES

BARYSHNIKOVA, YU.V.; EMETS, T.V.; VTORUSHINA, YU.L. The system of work to prevent the interference of the native language when teaching English to undergraduate students in the pedagogical direction. Prospects for science and education, n. 6, p. 173-181, 2018.

CHERNOVALJUK, I.V. Linguocultural approach in the practice of foreign language education. Linguistics. Lingvoculturology, n. 3, p. 3-14, 2019.

CHIKNAVEROVA, K. G. Interpretation and correction of errors in the speech of students of a foreign language. Review of foreign studies. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, n. 3, p. 129-135, 2018.

DEMIREZEN, M. Cognitive-code theory and foreign language learning relations. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), v. 1 n. 5, p. 309-317, 2014.

DINQAY, T. A cognitive approach to error correction and some cognitive tips on correcting writing errors. Journal of Social Sciences, n. 3. p. 82-91, 2009.

ELLIS, N.C. Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition. Modern language journal, v103, n. 51, 39-60, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12532

FALLA, J. Errors in Second Foreign Language Learning and Their Interpretations. Education and Linguistics Research, v. 3, n. 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v3i1.10251

GOIPOVA, S. M. Theory of concept in cognitive linguistics. Young scientist, n. 16, p. 304-305, 2019.

KYKALOVÁA, M.; VASILYEVA, E.A. On the problem of categorizing students based on their cognitive styles and teaching strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, n. 6, p. 578-587, 2015.

LIXIN, X. An Error Analysis of the Word Class: A Case Study of Chinese College Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, v. 10, n. 3, p. 41-45, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i3.4563

LYSTER, R.; MORI, N. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in second language acquisition, v. 28, p. 269-300, 2006.

MOSIN, M.V.; VODYASOVA, L.P.; MOSIN, N.M. The didactic potential of bilingualism in teaching a foreign language. Integration of Education, v. 4, n. 89, p. 751-754, 2017.

MUKHAMETKALIYEVA, S. S. Cognitive and linguoculturological system of concepts as theoretical and methodological basis of semasiological analysis of a language. Young scientist, v. 11, p. 276-279, 2018.

NORDQUIST, R. Cognitive Linguistics Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical Terms. 2020. Available from: https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-cognitive-linguistics-1689861 Accessed 30 Sep. 2021.

NORMAN, B.YU. Syntactics, cognition and compositional semantics. Russian Journal of Linguistics, v. 23, n. 3, p. 714-730, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-714-730

OBDALOVA, O.A.; SOBOLEVA, A.V. Accounting for cognitive styles of students as a way of individualizing the process of teaching a foreign language. Language and Culture, n. 3, p. 110-115, 2013.

PARK, С.; YAMANAKA, T. Cultural Differences of Cognitive Styles According to Experimental Methods- Focused on the Differences of Attribute and Relationship Oriented Thought among Nationalities. Transactions of Japan Society of Kansci Engineering, v. 10. n. 2, p. 149-157, 2011.

PROKHOROV, E.YU.; STERNIN, I.A. Russians: communicative behavior. Vol. 4. Moscow: Flint Publishing House Nauka Publishing House, 2016.

SAMOSENKOVA, T.V.; SAVOCHKINA, I.V.; GONCHAROVA, A.V. Mobile learning as an effective educational technology in the classes of Russian as a foreign language. Prospects for science and education, v. 2, n. 38, p. 307-319, 2019.

TIRADO, R.N. The problems of linguoculturology discussed on the pages of the “Russian Language Studies” journal. Russian Language Studies, n. 4, p. 380-397, 2018.

VINOGRADOVA, S.A. Cognitive linguistics on the meaning and concept. Questions of cognitive linguistics, n. 2, p. 50-55, 2014.

ZAVADSKAYA, A.V.; DMITRIYEVA, N.M. The specifics of the correctional course of Russian grammar for foreign medical students. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, n. 5, p. 27-35, 2018.