Cognitive errors and ways of their overcoming in teaching russian as a foreign languag

Alla Dmitriyevna Kulik; Sergey Andreyevich Vishnyakov; Nasrudin Magomedovich Alkhanov

doi:10.29051/el.v7iesp.5.16023

Autores/as

Alla Dmitriyevna Kulik People’s Friendship University of Russian (RUDN University), Moscow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1545-641X
Sergey Andreyevich Vishnyakov Moscow State Pedagogical University (MPGU), Moscow – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4975-9766
Nasrudin Magomedovich Alkhanov Chechen State University named after Akhmat Abdulkhamidovich Kadyrov, Grozny – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-8729

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.5.16023

Palabras clave:

Lingüística cognitiva, Visión lingüística del mundo, Enseñanza del ruso como lengua extranjera, Enfoque lingüístico

Resumen

El artículo está dedicado al problema de los errores de percepción cognitiva en la enseñanza del ruso como lengua extranjera entre estudiantes de una universidad con orientación internacional. El propósito del artículo es identificar y nivelar errores en la percepción de la información lingüística cultural como una imagen del mundo ruso en grupos de estudiantes extranjeros. La base metodológica del artículo está formada por enfoques lingüísticos y comunicativos. El autor del artículo realizó un estudio empírico en grupos de estudiantes extranjeros, durante el cual se revelaron errores cognitivos definidos. Con base en los resultados del estudio, el autor llegó a las siguientes conclusiones: en el proceso de enseñanza del idioma ruso, los errores cognitivos en la percepción de la información lingüística, que son de naturaleza local, tienen un efecto acumulativo y conducen a la aparición de errores cognitivos a nivel global. En este sentido, entre los estudiantes internacionales de una universidad con orientación internacional se necesita un enfoque integrado para superar los errores de percepción cognitiva en el proceso de enseñanza del ruso como lengua extranjera.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

REFERENCES

BARYSHNIKOVA, YU.V.; EMETS, T.V.; VTORUSHINA, YU.L. The system of work to prevent the interference of the native language when teaching English to undergraduate students in the pedagogical direction. Prospects for science and education, n. 6, p. 173-181, 2018.

CHERNOVALJUK, I.V. Linguocultural approach in the practice of foreign language education. Linguistics. Lingvoculturology, n. 3, p. 3-14, 2019.

CHIKNAVEROVA, K. G. Interpretation and correction of errors in the speech of students of a foreign language. Review of foreign studies. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, n. 3, p. 129-135, 2018.

DEMIREZEN, M. Cognitive-code theory and foreign language learning relations. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), v. 1 n. 5, p. 309-317, 2014.

DINQAY, T. A cognitive approach to error correction and some cognitive tips on correcting writing errors. Journal of Social Sciences, n. 3. p. 82-91, 2009.

ELLIS, N.C. Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition. Modern language journal, v103, n. 51, 39-60, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12532

FALLA, J. Errors in Second Foreign Language Learning and Their Interpretations. Education and Linguistics Research, v. 3, n. 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v3i1.10251

GOIPOVA, S. M. Theory of concept in cognitive linguistics. Young scientist, n. 16, p. 304-305, 2019.

KYKALOVÁA, M.; VASILYEVA, E.A. On the problem of categorizing students based on their cognitive styles and teaching strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, n. 6, p. 578-587, 2015.

LIXIN, X. An Error Analysis of the Word Class: A Case Study of Chinese College Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, v. 10, n. 3, p. 41-45, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i3.4563

LYSTER, R.; MORI, N. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in second language acquisition, v. 28, p. 269-300, 2006.

MOSIN, M.V.; VODYASOVA, L.P.; MOSIN, N.M. The didactic potential of bilingualism in teaching a foreign language. Integration of Education, v. 4, n. 89, p. 751-754, 2017.

MUKHAMETKALIYEVA, S. S. Cognitive and linguoculturological system of concepts as theoretical and methodological basis of semasiological analysis of a language. Young scientist, v. 11, p. 276-279, 2018.

NORDQUIST, R. Cognitive Linguistics Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical Terms. 2020. Available from: https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-cognitive-linguistics-1689861 Accessed 30 Sep. 2021.

NORMAN, B.YU. Syntactics, cognition and compositional semantics. Russian Journal of Linguistics, v. 23, n. 3, p. 714-730, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-714-730

OBDALOVA, O.A.; SOBOLEVA, A.V. Accounting for cognitive styles of students as a way of individualizing the process of teaching a foreign language. Language and Culture, n. 3, p. 110-115, 2013.

PARK, С.; YAMANAKA, T. Cultural Differences of Cognitive Styles According to Experimental Methods- Focused on the Differences of Attribute and Relationship Oriented Thought among Nationalities. Transactions of Japan Society of Kansci Engineering, v. 10. n. 2, p. 149-157, 2011.

PROKHOROV, E.YU.; STERNIN, I.A. Russians: communicative behavior. Vol. 4. Moscow: Flint Publishing House Nauka Publishing House, 2016.

SAMOSENKOVA, T.V.; SAVOCHKINA, I.V.; GONCHAROVA, A.V. Mobile learning as an effective educational technology in the classes of Russian as a foreign language. Prospects for science and education, v. 2, n. 38, p. 307-319, 2019.

TIRADO, R.N. The problems of linguoculturology discussed on the pages of the “Russian Language Studies” journal. Russian Language Studies, n. 4, p. 380-397, 2018.

VINOGRADOVA, S.A. Cognitive linguistics on the meaning and concept. Questions of cognitive linguistics, n. 2, p. 50-55, 2014.

ZAVADSKAYA, A.V.; DMITRIYEVA, N.M. The specifics of the correctional course of Russian grammar for foreign medical students. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, n. 5, p. 27-35, 2018.