"Human nature": phenomenology vs naturalism

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.8.16348

Mots-clés :

Human nature, Cognitive science, Phenomenology, Naturalism, Enactivism

Résumé

The article systematizes the philosophical knowledge of human nature from the point of view of two traditionally mutually exclusive methodological positions: on the one hand, cognitive science, which seeks to objectify the world and the essence of man in this world; on the other hand, a phenomenological discourse that elevates the subjective experience of human existence to the absolute, and, as a consequence, the ontological essence of man. It is found that the insufficiency of each of the described methodological approaches quite organically led the social theory to their collaboration - the emergence of enactivism. This approach to the definition of human nature turns out to be more complete, since it combines both pictures of the world - phenomenological and scientific. The article also traces the theoretical and logical connection between enactivism and the ideological attitudes of Indian religious teachings. The authors discover this connection by analyzing such aspects of the methodology as ontology, the process of cognition, the way of perceiving reality, etc.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Bibliographies de l'auteur

Ekaterina Valerievna Snarskaya, Kazan Federal University

PhD in Philosophy, Deputy Director for Educational Activities, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications

Aisylu Mudarisovna Kamaleeva, Kazan Federal University

Assistant, Department of Social Philosophy, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications

Références

МЕРКУЛОВ, И.П. (2009). Меркулов И. П. Когнитивная Наука [Электронный ресурс]. Энциклопедия эпистемологии и философии науки / Составление и общая редакция. И. Т. Касавин. – М.: «Канон+» РООИ «Реабилитация»,. – С. 364-365. – URL: https://gufo.me/dict/epistemology_encyclopedia/когнитивная_наука (дата обращения: 17.06.2020).

MILLER, GEORGE A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141–144.

TENGELYI, L. (2013). Agonistic World Projects: Transcendentalism Versus Naturalism. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 27(3), 247–249.

VARELA, F.J., THOMPSON, Е., & ROSCH, Е. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, – 321 p.

GIBSON, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0898599598 (1986).

NEISSER, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. New York: Freeman. ISBN 978-0716704775

КНЯЗЕВА, Е.Н. (2006). Эпистемологический конструктивизм. Философия науки. – М.: ИФ РАН, Выпуск 12. Феномен сознания. – С. 156.

ЛЫСЕНКО, В.Г., ТЕРЕНТЬЕВ, А.А., ШОХИН, В.К. (1994). Ранняя буддийская философия. Философия джайнизма. / В. Г. Лысенко,. – М.: Вост. литература, – С. 242.

КНЯЗЕВА, Е.Н. (2014). Энактивизм: новая форма конструктивизма в эпистемлогии.– М.; СПб.; Центр гуманитарных инициатив, Университетская книга, – С. 163.

МЕСЯЦ, С.В. (2012). Иоган Вольфганг Гёте и его учение о цвете (часть первая). М.: Кругъ, – С. 21.

Téléchargements

Publiée

30/12/2021

Comment citer

SNARSKAYA, E. V.; KAMALEEVA, A. M. "Human nature": phenomenology vs naturalism. Revista EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 7, n. esp.8, 2021. DOI: 10.29051/el.v7iesp.8.16348. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/16348. Acesso em: 7 déc. 2025.