Differences in the impact of vocabulary processing levels on noun and verb processing in the second language and its importance in teaching english
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.7.16308Keywords:
Language psychology, Word processing, Syllables, SyntaxAbstract
Based on the studies of language psychology, in word processing and recycling, perceptual, conceptual, syntactic coding, and phonetic patterns have been emphasized. Also, considering previous studies, theories about the sequence and synchronicity of the word processing level in phonetics, syllables, syntax, and semantics have been proposed. In this study, which was conducted with eighty-six undergraduate students of English language and literature, using the image naming test as a cognitive tool, the differences in the level of word processing in noun and verb games in the second language were investigated. According to the results of this study, in the second language, the processing of nouns is more than the level of perception, and the processing of verbs is affected by the level of regulation. As a result, teaching nouns in English makes them visible on appearance and appearance features, and in teaching verbs observation on meaningful features and characteristics.
Downloads
References
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Done in Marrakesh on April 15, 1994 (as amended on December 6, 2005). Entered into force for Russia on August 22, 2012. Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 2012. No. 37 (annex, part VI). P. 2818 - 2849.
Articles 1227, 1272, 1325, 1344, clause 6 of Article 1359, clause 6 of Article 1422, clause 6 of Article 1456, 1487 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 4): Federal Law No. 230-FZ dated December 18, 2006 (as amended on July 1, 2017). Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 2006. No. 52. Part 1. Art. 5496.
Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, 210 U.S., 1908. 339 p.
Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc., 934 F. Supp. 2d 640 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).
Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 1): Federal Law No. 51-FZ dated November 30, 1994 (as amended on December 16, 2019, May 12, 2020) // Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 1994. No. 32. Art. 3301.
Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 2): Federal Law No. 14-FZ dated January 26, 1996 (as amended on December 27, 2019, April 28, 2020) // Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 1996. No. 5. Art. 410.
CJEU, Ranks, Vasiļevičs v. Microsoft Corp. (2016) Case C-166/15.
Clause 96 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 10 dated April 23, 2019 "On the application of part four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation" // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2019. No. 7.
Copyright Act of 1976 (with amendments), codified in Title 17 of the United States Code. // URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17
Determann, L. (2018). Digital exhaustion: new law from the old world. Berkeley technology law journal, 33:177 (https://btlj.org/data/articles2018/vol33/33_1/Determann_Web.pdf)
Ernst, S.F. (2018). Total Patent Exhaustion!. IDEA – The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property, 59(1). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227002
Gavrilov, E. (2018). The principle of exhaustion of exclusive rights and its interpretation in the Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Economy and Law, 5, 36-46.
Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., 581 U.S., 2017.
Ivanova, M.M. (2018). Exhaustion of rights in online content licensing. Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court, 1. http://ipcmagazine.ru/asp/exhaustion-of-the-right-to-license-content-online
Jutte, B.J. (2016). Coexisting digital exploitation for creative content and the private use exception. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 24, P. 2.
Kohler. (1878). Deutsches Patentrecht. Mancheim, S. 100.
Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV (C-263/18) of 19 December 2019.
Perzanowski, A., & Schultz, J. (2017). The End of Ownership Personal Property in the Digital Economy. MIT Press, 30 – 31.
Pirogova, V.V. (2008). Exhaustion of exclusive rights and parallel imports. М.: Statut, - 155 p.
Posner, R.A., & Landes, W.A. (2003). The economic structure of intellectual property law. Harvard University Press, 37-40.
Redbox Automated Retail, LLC v. Disney Enterprises, Inc Case No. CV 17-08655 DDP (AGRx)
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 8-P dated February 13, 2018 “In the case of checking the constitutionality of the provisions of clause 4 of Article 1252, Article 1487 and clauses 1, 2 and 4 of Article 1515 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with a claim filed by PAG Limited Liability Company // Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 2018. No. 9. Art. 1435.
Resolution of the Intellectual Property Court dated 15 February 2017 in the case No. А40-233779/2015 // URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/62a138a2-2ab1-4bb2-b52e-9365bed7c4b9/0edd579d-0dfc-4731-a0e6-c7c500075fbd/A40-233779-2015_20170215_Reshenija_i_postanovlenija.pdf?isAddStamp=True
Review of judicial practice in cases related to the resolution of disputes over the protection of intellectual rights: approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on September 23, 2015 // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2015. No. 11.
Savelyev, A.I. (2016). E-commerce in Russia and abroad: legal regulation. 2nd edition. М.: Statut, P. 221.
Talita Marchione. Digital Exhaustion and the Implementation of Blockchain E-books (September 12, 2018). MIPLC Master Thesis Series (2017/18). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3433034
Urheberrechtsgesetz vom 9. September 1965 (BGBl. I S. 1273), das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 28. November 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2014) geändert worden ist // URL: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/UrhG.pdf
UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp., C-128/11, July 3, 2012 (ECJ)
Valve v. UFC-Que Choisir Jugement rendu le 17 Septembre 2019, N° RG 16/01008 N° Portalis 352J-W-B7A-CHAS
Vernor, V. (2010). Autodesk, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 621 F.3d 1102.
Vorozhevich, A.S. (2018). Antitrust vs Patent Rights: Why Will Antitrust Intervention Hinder Innovation?. Law, 1, 72 - 122.
WIPO Copyright Treaty (together with “Agreed Declarations Relating to the WIPO Copyright Treaty”). // Bulletin of International Treaties. 2016. No. 12. P. 4 - 11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista EntreLínguas. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
Transferência de direitos autorais – autorização para publicação
Caso o artigo submetido seja aprovado para publicação, já fica acordado que o(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a UNESP a reproduzi-lo e publicá-lo na EntreLínguas, entendendo-se os termos “reprodução” e “publicação” conforme definição respectivamente dos incisos VI e I do artigo 5° da Lei 9610/98. O artigo poderá ser acessado pela rede mundial de computadores (Internet), sendo permitidas, a título gratuito, a consulta e a reprodução de exemplar do artigo para uso próprio de quem a consulta, desde que haja a citação ao texto consultado. Essa autorização de publicação 328 EntreLínguas, Araraquara, v. 1, n .2, p. 323-328, jul./dez. 2015 não tem limitação de tempo, ficando a UNESP responsável pela manutenção da identificação do(s) autor(es) do artigo. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
