Differences in the impact of vocabulary processing levels on noun and verb processing in the second language and its importance in teaching english

Maxim Valerevich Voronin; Nataliia Vladimirovna Kozlova; Arina Sergeevna Vorozhevich

doi:10.29051/el.v7iesp.7.16308

Autores/as

Maxim Valerevich Voronin Kazan Federal University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-2682
Nataliia Vladimirovna Kozlova Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3671-6871
Arina Sergeevna Vorozhevich Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9908-2143

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.7.16308

Palabras clave:

Psicología del lenguaje, Procesamiento de textos, Sílabas, Sintaxis

Resumen

Con base en los estudios de la psicología del lenguaje, en el procesamiento y reciclaje de palabras, se han enfatizado los patrones perceptivos, conceptuales, sintácticos y fonéticos. Además, considerando estudios previos, se han propuesto teorías sobre la secuencia y sincronicidad del nivel de procesamiento de palabras en fonética, sílabas, sintaxis y semántica. En este estudio, que se realizó con ochenta y seis estudiantes de pregrado de lengua y literatura inglesas, utilizando como herramienta cognitiva la prueba de naming de imágenes, se investigaron las diferencias en el nivel de procesamiento de palabras en juegos de sustantivos y verbos en la segunda lengua. Según los resultados de este estudio, en el segundo idioma, el procesamiento de los sustantivos supera el nivel de percepción, y el procesamiento de los verbos se ve afectado por el nivel de regulación. Como resultado, enseñar sustantivos en inglés los hace visibles en apariencia y características de apariencia, y enseñar la observación de verbos en características y características significativas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Maxim Valerevich Voronin, Kazan Federal University

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor

Nataliia Vladimirovna Kozlova, Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor

Arina Sergeevna Vorozhevich, Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Assistant of the Department of Civil Law of the Faculty of Law

Citas

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Done in Marrakesh on April 15, 1994 (as amended on December 6, 2005). Entered into force for Russia on August 22, 2012. Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 2012. No. 37 (annex, part VI). P. 2818 - 2849.

Articles 1227, 1272, 1325, 1344, clause 6 of Article 1359, clause 6 of Article 1422, clause 6 of Article 1456, 1487 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 4): Federal Law No. 230-FZ dated December 18, 2006 (as amended on July 1, 2017). Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 2006. No. 52. Part 1. Art. 5496.

Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, 210 U.S., 1908. 339 p.

Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc., 934 F. Supp. 2d 640 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 1): Federal Law No. 51-FZ dated November 30, 1994 (as amended on December 16, 2019, May 12, 2020) // Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 1994. No. 32. Art. 3301.

Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 2): Federal Law No. 14-FZ dated January 26, 1996 (as amended on December 27, 2019, April 28, 2020) // Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 1996. No. 5. Art. 410.

CJEU, Ranks, Vasiļevičs v. Microsoft Corp. (2016) Case C-166/15.

Clause 96 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 10 dated April 23, 2019 "On the application of part four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation" // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2019. No. 7.

Copyright Act of 1976 (with amendments), codified in Title 17 of the United States Code. // URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17

Determann, L. (2018). Digital exhaustion: new law from the old world. Berkeley technology law journal, 33:177 (https://btlj.org/data/articles2018/vol33/33_1/Determann_Web.pdf)

Ernst, S.F. (2018). Total Patent Exhaustion!. IDEA – The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property, 59(1). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227002

Gavrilov, E. (2018). The principle of exhaustion of exclusive rights and its interpretation in the Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Economy and Law, 5, 36-46.

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., 581 U.S., 2017.

Ivanova, M.M. (2018). Exhaustion of rights in online content licensing. Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court, 1. http://ipcmagazine.ru/asp/exhaustion-of-the-right-to-license-content-online

Jutte, B.J. (2016). Coexisting digital exploitation for creative content and the private use exception. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 24, P. 2.

Kohler. (1878). Deutsches Patentrecht. Mancheim, S. 100.

Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV (C-263/18) of 19 December 2019.

Perzanowski, A., & Schultz, J. (2017). The End of Ownership Personal Property in the Digital Economy. MIT Press, 30 – 31.

Pirogova, V.V. (2008). Exhaustion of exclusive rights and parallel imports. М.: Statut, - 155 p.

Posner, R.A., & Landes, W.A. (2003). The economic structure of intellectual property law. Harvard University Press, 37-40.

Redbox Automated Retail, LLC v. Disney Enterprises, Inc Case No. CV 17-08655 DDP (AGRx)

Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 8-P dated February 13, 2018 “In the case of checking the constitutionality of the provisions of clause 4 of Article 1252, Article 1487 and clauses 1, 2 and 4 of Article 1515 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with a claim filed by PAG Limited Liability Company // Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 2018. No. 9. Art. 1435.

Resolution of the Intellectual Property Court dated 15 February 2017 in the case No. А40-233779/2015 // URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/62a138a2-2ab1-4bb2-b52e-9365bed7c4b9/0edd579d-0dfc-4731-a0e6-c7c500075fbd/A40-233779-2015_20170215_Reshenija_i_postanovlenija.pdf?isAddStamp=True

Review of judicial practice in cases related to the resolution of disputes over the protection of intellectual rights: approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on September 23, 2015 // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2015. No. 11.

Savelyev, A.I. (2016). E-commerce in Russia and abroad: legal regulation. 2nd edition. М.: Statut, P. 221.

Talita Marchione. Digital Exhaustion and the Implementation of Blockchain E-books (September 12, 2018). MIPLC Master Thesis Series (2017/18). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3433034

Urheberrechtsgesetz vom 9. September 1965 (BGBl. I S. 1273), das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 28. November 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2014) geändert worden ist // URL: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/UrhG.pdf

UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp., C-128/11, July 3, 2012 (ECJ)

Valve v. UFC-Que Choisir Jugement rendu le 17 Septembre 2019, N° RG 16/01008 N° Portalis 352J-W-B7A-CHAS

Vernor, V. (2010). Autodesk, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 621 F.3d 1102.

Vorozhevich, A.S. (2018). Antitrust vs Patent Rights: Why Will Antitrust Intervention Hinder Innovation?. Law, 1, 72 - 122.

WIPO Copyright Treaty (together with “Agreed Declarations Relating to the WIPO Copyright Treaty”). // Bulletin of International Treaties. 2016. No. 12. P. 4 - 11.