Effectiveness of foreign language teaching techniques
Provision of feedback as a way to correct writing mistakes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v8iesp.1.16934Keywords:
Foreign language, Corrective feedback, Writing, Direct feedback, Indirect feedbackAbstract
The study analyzes the problem of providing corrective feedback in studying a foreign language at the university as one of the types of feedback between a teacher and a student. The article regards feedback as a way of correcting students’ mistakes in executing control. The paper offers a characteristic of written feedback, identifies its various types and subtypes in terms of their specific characteristics and efficiency of use. Various approaches to the correction of students’ mistakes in writing and speech are analyzed. Particular attention is devoted to the conditions of giving effective feedback. The conducted experimental study of the effectiveness of different types of written corrective feedback between a teacher and a student in the process of foreign language learning concludes that indirect written corrective feedback proves more effective since indirect feedback requires greater participation of the students and their active involvement in the learning process.
Downloads
References
ARIDAH, A.; ATMOWARDOYO, H.; SALIJA, K. Teacher practices and students’ preferences for written corrective feedback and their implications on writing instruction. International Journal of English Linguistics, v. 7, n. 1, p. 112–125, 2017. Available in: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijel/article/view/63921. Access in: 15 Aug. 2021.
ARTEMOVA, E. G. et al. El uso de códigos QR y su eficacia en la aplicación de competencias profesionales [The use of QR codes and their efficiency in the application of professional skills]. Apuntes Universitarios, v. 12, n. 1, p. 419–435, 2021. Available in: https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/978. Access in: 17 Aug. 2021.
BAIDELDINOVA, G. et al. Improving students' independent work under teacher's supervision during foreign language learning at the university. European Journal of Contemporary Education, v. 10, n. 4, p. 868-878, 2021. Available in: https://oaji.net/pdf.html?n=2022/2-1642888759.pdf. Acceso in: 7 July 2021.
BESSONOV, K. A. Obratnaia sviaz v pedagogicheskom vzaimodeistvii prepodavatelia i studenta [Feedback in the pedagogical interaction between a teacher and a student]. Juvenis Scientia, n. 2, p. 86-89, 2016. Available in: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obratnaya-svyaz-v-pedagogicheskom-vzaimodeystvii-prepodavatelya-i-studenta. Access in: 09 July 2021.
BITCHENER, J.; YOUNG, S.; CAMERON, D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, v. 14, n. 3, p. 191–205, 2005. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1060374305000366. Access in: 3 Aug. 2021.
BLACK, D. A.; NANNI, A. Written corrective feedback: Preferences and justifications of teachers and students in a Thai context. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, v. 16, n. 3, p. 99–114, 2016. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309922729_Written_Corrective_Feedback_Preferences_and_Justifications_of_Teachers_and_Students_in_a_Thai_Context. Access in: 23 July 2021.
BREDIKHINA, I.A. Metodika prepodavaniia inostrannykh iazykov: Obuchenie osnovnym vidam rechevoi deiatelnosti [Methodology of teaching foreign languages: Teaching the main types of speech activity]. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House, 2018.
BROWN, G. T.; HARRIS, L. R.; HARNETT, J. Teacher beliefs about feedback within an assessment for learning environment: Endorsement of improved learning over student wellbeing. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 28, n. 7, p. 968–978, 2012. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X12000807?via%3Dihub. Access in: 11 Aug. 2021.
DMITRICHENKOVA, S. V. et al. Especificidades da estabilidade estrutural da criatividade profissional de um professor de línguas estrangeiras [Specifics of the structural stability of professional creativity of a foreign language teacher]. Revista EntreLinguas, v. 7, n. esp. 2, p. e021017, 2021. Available: in: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/15143. Access in: 20 Aug. 2021.
DZYUBA, E. M. et al. Open education courses as a relevant environment for improving professional competencies of teachers. Revista Tempos e Espaços Em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16164, 2021. Available in: https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/16164. Acceso in: 07 Aug. 2021.
ELLIS, R. A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, v. 63, n. 2, p. 97–107, 2008. Available in: https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/63/2/97/440749?login=false. Access in: 19 July 2021.
ELLIS, R. et al. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language context. System, v. 26, n. 3, p. 353–371, 2008. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0346251X08000390. Access in: 20 July 2021.
FARJADNASAB, A. H.; KHODASHENAS, M. R. The effect of written corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing accuracy. International Journal of Research in English Education, v. 2, n. 2, p. 30–42, 2017. Available in: https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=526154. Access in: 07 Aug. 2021.
GAMLEM, S. M.; MUNTHE, E. Mapping the quality of feedback to support students’ learning in lower secondary classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, v. 44, n. 1, p. 75–92, 2014. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0305764X.2013.855171. Access in: 14 July 2021.
GAMLEM, S. M.; SMITH, K. Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, v. 20, n. 2, p. 150-169, 2013. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212. Access in: 22 July 2021.
GOLUBEVA, T. I. et al. The impact of visualization tools in distance english language learning: the experience of the Russian university teachers. Revista tempos e espaços em educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16111, 2021. Available in: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8077572. Access in: 23 July 2021.
HUBACKOVA, S. Feedback in on-line foreign language teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 232, p. 316-320, 2016. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042816312605. Access in: 04 Aug. 2021.
LIU, N. F.; CARLESS, D. Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, v. 11, n. 3, p. 279-290, 2006. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13562510600680582. Access in: 15 July 2021.
MACKEY, A. Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, v. 27, n. 3, p. 405–430, 2006. Available in: https://academic.oup.com/applij/article-abstract/27/3/405/182957?login=false. Access in: 20 July 2021.
MALEKI, A.; ESLAMI, E. The effects of written corrective feedback techniques on EFL students’ control over grammatical construction of their written English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, v. 3, n. 7, p. 1250-1257, 2013. Available in: https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol03/07/24.pdf. Access in: 12 Aug. 2021.
ÖLMEZER-ÖZTÜRK, E. Beliefs and practices of Turkish EFL teachers regarding oral corrective feedback: A small-scale classroom research study. Language Learning Journal, v. 47, n. 2, p. 219-228, 2019. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09571736.2016.1263360. Access in: 17 Aug. 2021.
PANIKAROVA, N. P. et al. A influência da avaliação formativa das realizações acadêmicas dos alunos para aumentar sua motivação para estudar na universidade [The influence of formative assessment of students’ academic achievements on increasing their motivation to study at university]. Revista EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 7, n. esp. 4, p. e021088, 2021. Available in: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/15636. Access in: 03 Aug. 2021.
PARR, J. M.; HAWE, E. Facilitating real-time observation of, and peer discussion and feedback about, practice in writing classrooms. Professional Development in Education, v. 43, n. 5, p. 709–728, 2017. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19415257.2016.1241818. Access in: 30 jul. 2021.
POPOVA, E. N.; BOBROVA, S. E.; MALTZAGOV, I. D. Desenvolvimento da competência e cultura da utilização de ferramentas de tradução automática em futuros tradutores (a exemplo de dominar o uso de ferramentas gatos) [Development of the competency and culture of usingautomatic translation tools in future translators (on the example of mastering the use of cat tools)]. Revista EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 7, n. esp. 5, 2021. Available in: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/16024. Acceso in: 10 Aug. 2021.
RUDZEWITZ, B. et al. Generating feedback for English foreign language exercises. New Orleans: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018.
SHUTE, V. J. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, v. 78, n. 1, p. 153-189, 2008. Available in: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0034654307313795. Access in: 12 July 2021.
SKOVHOLT, K. Anatomy of a teacher–student feedback encounter. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 69, p. 142–153, 2018. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X17300082. Access in: 13 Aug. 2021.
USMANOVA, E.; KHOKHLOVA, E.; FEDOSEEV, R. Mediation and communication practices in education. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, v. 14, n. 33, e16562, 2021. Available in: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8120468. Access in: 07 Aug. 2021.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista EntreLínguas. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
Transferência de direitos autorais – autorização para publicação
Caso o artigo submetido seja aprovado para publicação, já fica acordado que o(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a UNESP a reproduzi-lo e publicá-lo na EntreLínguas, entendendo-se os termos “reprodução” e “publicação” conforme definição respectivamente dos incisos VI e I do artigo 5° da Lei 9610/98. O artigo poderá ser acessado pela rede mundial de computadores (Internet), sendo permitidas, a título gratuito, a consulta e a reprodução de exemplar do artigo para uso próprio de quem a consulta, desde que haja a citação ao texto consultado. Essa autorização de publicação 328 EntreLínguas, Araraquara, v. 1, n .2, p. 323-328, jul./dez. 2015 não tem limitação de tempo, ficando a UNESP responsável pela manutenção da identificação do(s) autor(es) do artigo. Os artigos publicados e as referências citadas na Revista EntreLínguas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
