Reflection of image words in language as a secondary reality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v8iesp.3.17448

Keywords:

Cognitive linguistics, Image, Imagination, Meaning, Metaphor, Lexical invariant

Abstract

The search for a consistent interpretation of the semantic structure of a word at the level of invariance has propelled imagery into the ranks of the most pressing issues. The paper determines the specific properties and characteristics of images. An invariant-component analysis of each of the figurative meanings and comparing them further with the semantics of the first nominative non-derivative meaning are utilized to meet the aim of the study. It is shown that the words denoting objects of nature, artifacts, zoomorphisms, that is, a specific lexicon that designates the realities that are closest to the life of people, are more descriptive. Generalization and abstractness of an image develop as a word is applied to new figurative metaphorical meanings in the process of comprehending the semantic structure of a polysemantic word.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Svetlana A. Pesina, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

Dr of Philology, Dr of Philosophy, Professor at the Department of Linguistics and Translation.

Lyubov N. Churilina, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

Dr. Sc. in Philology, Professor at the Department of Russian Language, General Linguistics and Mass Communication.

Irina R. Pulekha, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Linguistics and Translation.

Natalia V. Kozhushkova, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

Ph.D., Associate Professor at the Department of Pedagogical Education and Records Management.

Svetlana V. Kharitonova, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

Ph.D. Department of Linguistic and Literature.

Svetlana S. Velikanova, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

Ph.D., Head of the Department of Pedagogical Education and Records Management.

References

Bunyatova, A. B. (2018). Concept as an object of study of cognitive linguistics and linguoculturology. Theoretical & applied science, (10), 219-226.

Cavazzana, A., & Bolognesi, M. (2020). Uncanny resemblance: Words, pictures, and conceptual representations in the field of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 31-57.

Evans, V., Bergen, B. K., & Zinken, J. (2015). The cognitive linguistics enterprise: An overview (pp. 2-36). Equinox.

Górska, E. (2019). Understanding Abstract Concepts Across Modes in Multimodal Discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach. Routledge.

Gouteraux, P. (2017). Lexical complexity: Metaphors and collocations in native, non-native and bilingual speech. Proceedings 3, Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain, 363, 384.

Hurtienne, J. (2017). How cognitive linguistics inspires HCI: image schemas and image-schematic metaphors. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(1), 1-20.

Kiseleva, S., & Trofimova, N. (2017). Metaphor as a device for understanding cognitive concepts. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 23(2), 226-246.

Janda, L. A. (2015). Cognitive linguistics in the year 2015. Cognitive Semantics, 1(1), 131-154.

Mácha, J. (2019). Metaphor in Analytic Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 75(Fasc. 4), 2247-2286.

Pan, M. X. (2019). The effectiveness of the Conceptual Metaphor Approach to English idiom acquisition by young Chinese learners. Metaphor and the Social World, 9(1), 59-82.

Pesina, S. A., Ovcharova, S. V., Kozhushkova, N. V., Andreeva, S. L., Igoshina, N. V., Lukina, O. A., & Chernykh, O. P. (2021). Education and anthropomorphism in language through embodiment lens. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional.

Pesina, S. A., Yusupova, L. G., & Pulekha, I. R. (2019). Anthropomorphism in language studied through the prism of embodiment. Вестник Челябинского государственного университета, 10 (432), 223-227.

Pesina, S., & Latushkina, O. (2015). Polysemy and Cognition. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 192, 486-490.

Solonchak, T., & Pesina, S. (2015). Cognitive properties of images and metaphors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 650-655.

Zhao, Q., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C. R. (2022). Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: a lexical-conceptual account. Cognitive Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0098

Downloads

Published

30/06/2022

How to Cite

PESINA, S. A.; CHURILINA, L. N.; PULEKHA, I. R.; KOZHUSHKOVA, N. V.; KHARITONOVA, S. V.; VELIKANOVA, S. S. Reflection of image words in language as a secondary reality. Revista EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 8, n. esp.3, 2022. DOI: 10.29051/el.v8iesp.3.17448. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/17448. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos

Most read articles by the same author(s)