Axiological aspect of the concept “strange” in publicistic articles

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.7.16296

Keywords:

Anthropocentrism, Concept, Value, Assessment, Axiology, Axiological analysis, Axiological linguistics

Abstract

The article examines the axiological status of the concept “strange” in journalistic articles devoted to SARS-CoV-2. The axiological interpretation of the concept in question occurs through various subjective and objective value judgments. The purpose of the article is an axiological analysis of the concept “strange”, which reveals hidden or explicit, positive, negative or neutral evaluative meanings of this concept in the modern English language picture of the world. Through the study of the axiological component of the concepts, the specificity and mental preferences are displayed not only of an individual specific linguistic personality, but also of the people as a whole in a certain period of time. Through the prism of the axiological analysis of concepts the peculiarities of the value preferences of a linguistic personality are revealed, which outside the context can acquire a different axiological status. Thus, after the study of the concept “strange” it was revealed that this concept has a negative axiological status in the axiosphere of the English language picture of the world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANISIMOV, S.F. Introduction to axiology: textbook on philosophy. M.: Modern notebooks, 128 p. 2001.

ARCHIE, J. Bahm Axiology, the Science of Values: Ethics, the Science of Oughtness Rodopi, 134. 1993.

ARUTYUNOVA, N.D. About the object of the general assessment. Issues of linguistics. No. 3. 13-24. 1985.

ARUTYUNOVA, N.D. Axiology in the mechanisms of life and language. Problems of structural linguistics: collection of articles. Collection of scientific works. M., 5-23. 1984.

ARUTYUNOVA, N.D. Introduction. About the Whole on the Whole. Time and Space in the Conceptualization of Reality. Logical Analysis of Language. The Semantics of the Beginning and the End. M.: Indrik, 3-18.2002.

ARUTYUNOVA, N.D. Types of linguistic meanings: assessment, event, fact. In charge G.V. Stepanov; Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Linguistics. Moscow.: Nauka, 341 p. 1988.

Cambridge Dictionary https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/ (reference date: 14.12.2020)

DEMYANKOV, V.Z. Interpretation of political discourse in the media. Language of the mass media: a textbook for universities. M: Academic project, 374 - 394. 2008.

FINDLAY, J. N. Axiological Ethics. New York: Macmillan, 1970, 100. 1970.

KARASIK, V. I. Categorical signs in the word meaning: textbook. MOPI. - M., 1988.

KARASIK, V.I. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Change, 2002. - 477 p. 2002.

KRZESZOWSKI, T.P. The Axiological Aspect of Idealized Cognitive Models. In Tomaszczyk, J. and Lewandowska, B. (eds) Meaning and Lexicography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 135-165. 1990.

KUBRYAKOVA, E.S., DEMYANKOV, V.Z., PANKRATS, Y.G., & LUZINA, L.G. Dictionary of Cognitive Terms in Brief.– M.: The Moscow State University Press, 245 p. 1996.

KUZINA, O.A. The axiological aspect of the linguistic representation of the image of Ukraine in the English-speaking mass media: Dis. by Ph.D. in Philology. St. Petersburg, 2019. - 161 p. 2019.

NICHOLAS RESCHER. Value Matters: Studies in Axiology, De Gruyter, 140.2004.

SEREBRENNIKOVA, E.F. Ethnosemiometry as a Way of Linguistic Axiological Analysis. Ethnosemiometry of Value Meanings: Collective Monograph.– Irkutsk: ISLU,. – S. 8 – 62.2008.

WOLF, E.M. Functional Semantics of Evaluation.– M.: Editorial of the Ukrainian SSR, – 280 p. 2002.

Downloads

Published

30/12/2021

How to Cite

CHEKULAI, I. V.; PROKHOROVA, O. N.; KYCHKOVA, M. V.; PUPYNINA, E. V.; PUGACH, V. S. Axiological aspect of the concept “strange” in publicistic articles. Revista EntreLinguas, Araraquara, v. 7, n. esp.7, 2021. DOI: 10.29051/el.v7iesp.7.16296. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/entrelinguas/article/view/16296. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Most read articles by the same author(s)