Desenvolvimento e teste de um modelo de educação à distância

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25i3.15923

Palavras-chave:

Transformação digital, Fatores socioculturais, Nível macro de administração

Resumo

Este documento visa apresentar um modelo universal aplicável a todos os níveis de ensino à distância, em uma região e organização educacional particular. Os autores aplicaram uma abordagem sistemática para considerar a introdução da educação à distância como uma atividade, cujo resultado depende das condições socioculturais atuais na região, incluindo as especificidades da população, do mercado de trabalho, da situação socioeconômica e política, e da qualidade do ensino nas organizações educacionais. A novidade científica da pesquisa inclui fundamentação teórica e metodológica de um modelo universal de implementação da educação à distância. Ela envolve medidas obrigatórias de monitoramento e apoio em todos os níveis de administração: micro- (uma organização educacional), meso- (administração regional e municipal) e macroadministração (o Estado). Explorando o problema da pesquisa, os autores revelaram que a eficácia do ensino à distância está diretamente ligada à qualidade da análise regional dos fatores socioculturais na fase de planejamento e previsão.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Roman Vladimirovich Kamenev, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University (NSPU), Novosibirsk – Russia

Associate Professor, Director of the Institute of Physics, Mathematics, Information and Technology Education. Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences.

Mariya Alekseevna Abramova, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University (NSPU), Novosibirsk – Russia

Professor of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy of the Institute of Physical, Mathematical, Information and Technological Education. Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences.

Valery Vasilyevich Krasheninnikov, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University (NSPU), Novosibirsk – Russia

Professor of the Department of Engineering and Technological Education of the Institute of Physical, Mathematical, Information and Technological Education. Candidate of Technical Sciences.

Referências

ABRAMOVA, M. A. Cifrovaja transformacija v regionah Rossii: Ocenki i realʹnostʹ [Digital transformation in the regions of Russia: Estimates and reality]. Professionalʹnoe Obrazovanie v Sovremennom Mire [Professional Education in the Modern World], Novosibirsk, v. 11, n. 3, p. 11-22, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2224-1841-2021-3-02

ABRAMOVA, M. A.; FARNIKA, M. Cifrovizacija obrazovanija v uslovijah cifrovogo neravenstva [Digitalization of education in the context of digital inequality]. Professionalʹnoe Obrazovanie v Sovremennom Mire [Professional Education in the Modern World], Novosibirsk, v. 9, n. 4, p. 3167-3175, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190403

AGASISTI, T. et al. Efficiency of regional higher education systems and regional economic short-run growth: empirical evidence from Russia. Industry and Innovation, Frederiksberg, v. 28, n. 4, p. 507-534, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1738914

ANDREEV, A. A. Očerki distancionnogo obučenija v Rossii [Essays on distance education in Russia]. Upravlenie Obrazovaniem: Teorija i Praktika [Education Management: Theory and Practice], Moscow, n. 1(13), p. 16-31, 2014.

APRIYANTI, C. Distance learning and obstacles during COVID-19 outbreak. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, Semarang, v. 7, n. 2, p. 68-83, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/pendas.7.2.68-83

ARKHIPOVA, M. Y.; SIROTIN, V. P. Regionalʹnye Aspekty Razvitija Informacionnokommunikacionnyh I Cifrovyh Tehnologij V Rossii [Regional aspects of the development of information, communication, and digital technologies in Russia]. Economy of the Regions, Ekaterinburg, v. 15, n. 3, p. 670-683, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-3-4

BARANNIKOV, K. A. et al. Uroki stress-testa: Vuzy v uslovijah pandemii i posle nee [Lessons of the stress test: Universities during the pandemic and after it]. 2020. Available: https://www.tsu.ru/news/uroki-stress-testa-vuzy-v-usloviyakh-pandemii-i-po/. Access: 4 Oct. 2021.

BASILAIA, G.; KVAVADZE, D. Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, Outumaoro, v. 5, n. 4, em0060, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937

BERTIZ, Y.; KOCAMAN-KAROĞLU, A. Distance Education Students’ Cognitive Flexibility Levels and Distance Education Motivations. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, Leiden, v. 6, n. 4, p. 638-648, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1022

BOARINI, R. et al. What Makes for a Better Life? The Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2012/03. Paris: OECD, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9b9ltjm937-en

BONK, C. J. Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: Synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors? Distance Education, Ottawa, v. 41, n. 4, p. 589-599, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821610

BROM, C. et al. Mandatory Home Education During the COVID-19 Lockdown in the Czech Republic: A Rapid Survey of 1st-9th Graders’ Parents. Frontiers in Education, Orange, v. 5, p. 103, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00103

CHERNYSHOV, S. A. Massovyj perehod školy na distancionnoe obučenie v ocenkah lokalʹnogo pedagogičeskogo soobŝestva [Massive shift of schools towards distance learning in the estimates of a local pedagogical community]. Obrazovanie I Nauka [The Education and Science Journal], Yekaterinburg, v. 23, n. 3, p. 131-155, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-3-131-155

CIFFOLILLI, A.; MUSCIO, A. Industry 4.0: National and regional comparative advantages in key enabling technologies. European Planning Studies, Bergen, v. 26, n. 12, p. 2323-2343, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1529145

DERYABIN, A. A. et al. Issledovanie predstavlenij direktorov rossijskih škol o cifrovyh kompetencijah učastnikov obrazovatelʹnoj sistemy [Russian School Principals’ Beliefs about Digital Competences of Educational Process’ Participants]. Voprosy Obrazovanija [Educational Studies], Moscow, n. 3, p. 212-236, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-3-212-236

ELLISTON, Z. A. A position paper on the implementation of learning technology tools: Uncovering faculty perceptions. International Journal on Studies in Education, Leiden, v. 2, n. 1, p. 58-65, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.11

EUBANKS, V. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018.

FAUZI, I.; KHUSUMA, I. H. S. Teachers’ Elementary School in Online Learning of COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, v. 5, n. 1, p. 58-70, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v5i1.914

FROLOVA, E. V.; ROGACH, O. V.; RYABOVA, T. M. Digitalization of Education in Modern Scientific Discourse: New Trends and Risks Analysis. European Journal of Contemporary Education, Sochi, v. 9, n. 2, p. 331-336, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.2.313

GLUCKMAN, P.; ALLEN, K. Understanding Wellbeing in the Context of Rapid Digital and Associated Transformations: Implications for Research, Policy and Measurement. Auckland: The International Network for Government Science Advice, 2018. Available: http://www.ingsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/INGSA-Digital-Wellbeing-Sept18.pdf. Access: 10 Sept. 2021.

GROSHEV, I. V.; KRASNOSLOBODTSEV, A. A. Cifrovizacija i kreativnostʹ rossijskih regionov [Digitization and creativity of Russian regions]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sotsiological Research], Moscow, n. 5, p. 66-78, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250009390-2

GUBERNATOROV, Y. Studenty nazvali osnovnye problemy onlajn-obučenija: Im ne hvataet obŝenija s prepodavateljami i podvodit tehnika [Students named the main problems of online learning: They lack communication with teachers and the technique fails]. RBK, 2020. Available: https://www.rbc.ru/society/19/08/2020/5f3bbdae9a7947d167de1a41. Access: 4 Sept. 2021.

HEWITT-DUNDAS, N. Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Research Policy, Brington, v. 41, n. 2, p. 262-275, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.010

IBRAHIM, S. A. E.-S. Educational Platforms and Digital Transformation in Raising Awareness about Remote Education in Light of the Corona Epidemic Spread Among Secondary School Students. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, v. 56, n. 1, p. 358-376, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.1.33

IQBAL, S. A. et al. We should avoid flattening the curve in education – Possible scenarios for learning loss during the school lockdowns. Education for Global Development, 2020. Available: https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/we-should-avoid-flattening-curve-education-possible-scenarios-learning-loss-during-school. Access: 4 Sept. 2021.

JARZABKOWSKI, P.; SILLINCE, J. A. A.; SHAW, D. Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests. Human Relations, Durham, v. 63, n. 2, p. 219-248, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709337040

KAMENEV, R. V.; ABRAMOVA, M. A.; KRASHENINNIKOV, V. V. Distancionnoe obrazovanie: modeli, urovni vnedrenija i problemy realizacii [Distance education: Models, implementation levels, and implementation problems]. Vestnik Pedagogičeskih Innovacij [Bulletin of Pedagogical Innovations], Novosibirsk, n. 3, p. 54-64, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/1812-9463.2103.05

KARAKAYA, K. Design considerations in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A human-centered approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, Chestnut Hill, v. 69, p. 295-299, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09884-0

KHUTORSKOY, A. V. Osobennosti razvitija distancionnogo obučenija v rossijskih školah [Peculiarities of distance learning development in Russian schools]. 2000. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-razvitiya-distantsionnogo-obucheniya-v-rossiyskih-shkolah. Access: 4 Sept. 2021.

LARIONOVA, V. A. et al. Èkonomičeskie aspekty vynuždennogo perehoda na distancionnoe obučenie, ili Kakuju cenu zaplatili vuzy za distant [Economic aspects of emergency transition to distance education, or the price of going online in higher education]. Voprosy Obrazovanija [Educational Studies], Moscow, n. 1, p. 138-157, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-138-157

LEAHY, S. M.; HOLLAND, C.; WARD, F. The digital frontier: Envisioning future technologies impact on the classroom. Futures, Bristol, v. 113, 102422, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.04.009

LEE, J. Mental health effects of school closures during COVID‐19. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, London, v. 4, n. 6, 421, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30109-7

LITVINTSEVA, G. P.; GLINSKIY, V. V.; STUKALENKO, E. A. Interregional differentiation of population incomes in Russian Federation in the post-crisis period. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, Richardson, v. 16, n. 4, 151, 2017. Available: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Interregional-differentiation-of-population-incomes-1939-6104-16-4-151.pdf. Access: 10 Sept. 2021.

LITVINTSEVA, G. P. et al. Ocenka cifrovoj sostavljajuŝej kačestva žizni naselenija v regionah Rossijskoj Federacii1 [Digital component of people’s quality of life assessment in the regions of the Russian Federation]. Terra Economicus, Rostov-on-Don, v. 17, n. 3, p. 107-127, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-3-107-127

MEANS, B. et al. The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, New York, v. 115, n. 3, p. 1-47, 2013. Available: https://learnonline.ecampusontario.ca/App_Content/Resource/docs/7b0981b7-dbd6-41d2-83b9-67878a0ed052/The%20effectiveness%20of%20online%20and%20blended%20learning_%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20the%20empirical%20literature.pdf. Access: 10 Sept. 2021.

MUNROE, P. T. Cognitive balance theory (Heider). In: The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc057.pub2

MURPHY, M. P. A. COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, Maastricht, v. 41, n. 3, p. 492-505, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749

NARKHOV, D. Y.; NARKHOVA, E. N.; SHKURIN, D. V. Dinamika obrazovatelʹnoj aktivnosti studenčestva pod vozdejstviem cifrovizacii [Dynamics of educational activity of students under the influence of digitalisation]. Obrazovanie I Nauka [The Education and Science Journal], Yekaterinburg, v. 23, n. 8, p. 147-188, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-8-147-188

ORGILÉS, M. et al. Immediate psychological effects of the COVID-19 quarantine in youth from Italy and Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, Lausanne, n. 11, 579038, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579038

ÖZÜDOĞRU, G. Problems faced in distance education during Covid-19 Pandemic. Participatory Educational Research, Ankara, v. 8, n. 4, p. 321-333, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.92.8.4

PETRAKOVA, A. V. et al. Osobennosti psihologičeskogo stressa u učitelej v uslovijah distancionnogo prepodavanija vo vremja pandemii COVID 19 [Characteristics of Teacher Stress during Distance Learning Imposed by the COVID 19 Pandemic]. Voprosy obrazovanija [Educational Studies], Moscow, n. 1, p. 93-114, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-93-114

POLAT, E. S. Educational Technology of Distance Learning. Moscow: Academia, 2006.

RABOSSI, M.; GUAGLIANONE, A. Las políticas de internacionalización universitaria en la Argentina: movilidad estudiantil y producción científica. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, Araraquara, v. 15, n. esp4, p. 2556-2576, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v15iesp4.14504

RASMITADILA, R. et al. The Perceptions of Primary School Teachers of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: A Case Study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, Fort Myers, v. 7, n. 2, p. 90-109, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388

ROGACHEVA, P. S.; SEMERGEY, S. V. Problems of distance education during the pandemic. Vestnik Majkopskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tehnologiceskogo Universiteta, v. 12, n. 4, p. 85-93, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47370/2078-1024-2020-12-4-85-93

RUSSIA. Article 16, Law No. 273-FZ, from 29 December, 2012. Implementation of educational programs using e-learning and distance learning technologies. Moscow: Ministry of Education, 2012. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/9ab9b85e5291f25d6986b5301ab79c23f0055ca4/. Access: 4 Oct. 2021.

RUSSIA. Ministry of Education and Science. Order No. 816. On Approval of the Procedure for the Application of E-Learning, Distance Learning Technologies by Organizations Carrying Out Educational Activities in the Implementation of Educational Programs. Moscow: Ministry of Education and Science, 23 Aug. 2017. Available: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_278297/. Access: 10 Sept. 2021.

SAPRYKINA, D. I.; VOLOKHOVICH, A. A. Problemy perehoda na distancionnoe obučenie v Rossijskoj Federacii glazami učitelej [Problems of Transition to Distance Learning in the Russian Federation through the Eyes of Teachers]. Institut obrazovanija [Institute of Education]. 2020. Available: https://ioe.hse.ru/fao_distant. Access: 2 Sept. 2021.

SAYKILI, A. Distance education: Definitions, generations, key concepts and future directions. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, Elazığ, v. 5, n. 1, p. 2-17, 2018. Available: http://ijcer.net/en/pub/issue/38043/416321. Access: 10 Sept. 2021.

SCHMIDT, K. et al. Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services: Insights for management. Land Use Policy, Enschede, v. 82, p. 353-366, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.022

SHCHENNIKOV, S. A. Open Distance Education: Monograph. Moscow: Nauka, 2002.

SKOLKOVO MOSCOW SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT. Methodology for Calculating the Digital Russia Index of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Skolkovo, 2018. Available: https://finance.skolkovo.ru/downloads/documents/FinChair/Research_Reports/SKOLKOVO_Digital_Russia_Methodology_2019-04_ru.pdf. Access: 2 Sept. 2021.

USTYUZHANINA, E. V.; EVSUKOV, S. G. Digitalization of the educational environment: perspectives and threats. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, n. 1, p. 3-12, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2018-1-3-12

VINER, R. M. et al. School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, London, v. 4, n. 5, p. 397-404, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-X

ZIERER, K. Putting Learning before Technology! The Possibilities and Limits of Digitalization. New York: Routledge, 2019.

ZIZIKOVA, S. I.; SHIKHOVTSOV, Y. V.; MATASOVA, I. L. Transformation of education in the context of digitalization. In: GLOBAL CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS OF THE MODERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2020, Samara. Proceedings [...]. London: The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2021. p. 1074-1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.04.02.128

ZVYAGINTSEV, R. S.; KERSHA, Y. D.; PINSKAYA, M. A. Perehod na distancionnoe obrazovanie: Detalʹnyj razbor municipalʹnogo kejsa [Transition to distance education: A detailed analysis of the municipal case]. Vysšaja Škola Èkonomiki, Institut Obrazovanija [Higher School of Economics, Institute of Education]. 2021. Available: https://ioe.hse.ru/sao_region. Access: 2 Sept. 2021.

Publicado

08/12/2021

Como Citar

KAMENEV, R. V.; ABRAMOVA, M. A.; KRASHENINNIKOV, V. V. Desenvolvimento e teste de um modelo de educação à distância. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, Araraquara, v. 25, n. 3, p. 2408–2427, 2021. DOI: 10.22633/rpge.v25i3.15923. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/rpge/article/view/15923. Acesso em: 24 maio. 2022.