The role of tradition and innovations in the development of the primary education theory in Azerbaijan (1920-1931)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.15005

Keywords:

Azerbaijan, Primary education, Content of education, Traditional education, Innovative education, Alphabet reform, Project method

Abstract

The study of the history of primary education in Azerbaijan expands the boundaries of pedagogical thinking. The re-introduction of the progressive aspects of the historical and pedagogical heritage of the 20th century into scientific circles plays an important role in the formation of modern educational culture. Historical and pedagogical heritage is a source of renewal of pedagogical knowledge, acquisition of qualitatively new content, as well as its sustainability. It is important to study the history of primary education, as it helps to solve two problems that are closely related to each other. Firstly, what happened when one first examined the historical pedagogical heritage? How did it happen? Why did it happen and what was the result? What was the significance of what happened during that period and further development? Secondly, by referring to the historical pedagogical heritage, it is possible to understand the theory and practice of today's education, the problems of modern pedagogical thinking and worldview. The article examines and compares the role of tradition and innovation in the development of the theory of primary education in Azerbaijan in the 1920s. For this purpose, the article analyzes the educational technologies used in that period, general scientific approaches, curricula and content of textbooks prepared for primary schools, and quality criteria in teacher training. It is argued that this period was politically complex, economically difficult, characterized by a general decline in the common cultural and educational level of the population, but was interesting in terms of the building of a new society and a new state. Reforms in the field of education in Russia were repeated in Azerbaijan. Although experiments in the field of education were aimed at raising the cultural level of society, eliminating illiteracy, establishing new approaches to education, innovations (application of "complex" approach, use of active learning methods, application of project method, etc.), they did not improve the quality of education. The introduction of innovations sometimes led to the denial and oblivion of traditions. The new teaching methods applied in Azerbaijani schools without any expertise, as they were brought from European and American schools, created serious problems in the formation of education because the new technology denied the tradition. The class-lesson system with strict regulations, exhaustive structure and function, and rich traditions were replaced by the laboratory-brigade method. The results of incorrect experiments became a serious obstacle to the development of education. For this reason, in the early 1930s, official government decisions banned experiments that hindered the development of education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aytekin Mammadova, Sumgayit State University (SSU), Baku

Dr. Head of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology.

References

AZERBAİJAN. Archive of Azerbaijan, n. 2, p. 16, 1980.

AZERBAİJAN. Decree of the Azerbaijan Central Executive Committee and the Council of People's Commissars of the Azerbaijan SSR. On the recognition of the new Turkic alphabet as the state. Baku Worker, Baku, 31 oct. 1923.

AZERBAİJAN. Decree of the Revolutionary Committee of Azerbaijan. On conducting language classes in primary and secondary schools. “Communist” newspaper, 20 sep. 1920.

AZERBAİJAN. Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan on Education. Baku: Azerbaijan State University of Economics, 2019.

AZERBAİJAN. State Archive of the Republic of Azerbaijan, f.379, list 2, case 3082, p. 16.

AZERBAİJAN. State Archive of the Republic of Azerbaijan, f.57, list 1, case 151, p. 192.

AZERBAİJAN. State Archive of the Republic of Azerbaijan, f.57, list 1, case 342, p. 18.

BAKU. Programs of primary schools. Baku: Azerneshr, 1923.

BLONSKY, P. P. Selected pedagogical and psychological works: ın 2 volumes. Moscow: Pedagogy, 1979. v. 1.

IVANOV, S. V.; IORDANSKİY, N. N. New systems of educational work in schools in Europe and North America. Moscow: Rabotnik prosveshcheniya, 1930.

KALASHNİKOV, A. G. Pedagogical encyclopedia: ın 3 volumes. Moscow: Worker of education, 1927. v. 1.

KRUPSKAYA, N. K. Selected pedagogical works. Baku: Maarif. 1992.

MEHDİZADE, M. Summaries on the history of the Soviet school in Azerbaijan. Baku: Azerneshr, 1958.

MURADKHANOV, M. Pedagogics. Baku: Azertedrisneshr, 1964.

NEW school magazine, n. 1, p. 84-88, 1926.

SOROKİN, A.; SAKHAROVA, E. Dalton-plan in the context of reforms of the training process in soviet higher education in 1920-1930s. The Anthropologist, v. 23, n. 1-2, p. 120-125, 2016.

THE Land-Grant Tradition. Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, 2012. Available: https://www.aplu.org/library/the-land-grant-tradition/file. Access: 10 dec. 2020.

VAN DER PLOEG, P. The Dalton Plan: recycling in the guise of innovation. Paedagogica Historica. International Journal of the History of Education, v. 49, n. 3, p. 314-329, 2013.

WEİCHHART, G. S-BPM Education on the dalton plan: an e-learning approach. In: OPPL, S.; FLEİSCHMANN, A. (Eds.). S-BPM ONE: education and ındustrial developments. S-BPM ONE 2012. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012. p. 181–193, 2012.

YESİPOV, B. P.; GONCHAROV, N. K. Pedagogics. Baku: Azerneshr, 1941.

Published

01/03/2021

How to Cite

MAMMADOVA, A. The role of tradition and innovations in the development of the primary education theory in Azerbaijan (1920-1931). Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, Araraquara, v. 25, n. esp.1, p. 654–672, 2021. DOI: 10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.15005. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/rpge/article/view/15005. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2024.