Gender characteristics of primary school students’ success in solving tasks in the context of varying extrinsic motivational attitudes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.15006Keywords:
Motivation, Gender, Convergent tasks, Success, StudentsAbstract
The article presents the results of an empirical study of specific characteristics of the success of boys and girls of primary school age in solving convergent problems under the condition of varying motivational attitudes. The study was conducted in the elementary school of the State Budgetary Educational Institution of Moscow “School No. 1561” educational complex in 2016-2018. The study sample includes 239 second-grade students the average age of whom was 8.2 years old. 137 of the study participants were boys and 102 were girls which constitutes 57% and 43% of the sample, respectively. Motivation is assessed via the authors’ modification of N.V. Elfimova’s method “A ladder of motives”, a version of M. Seligman’s Children’s Attributional Style Questionnaire (CASQ) modified by N.A. Baturina and D.A. Tsiring, and the authors’ modification of C. Dweck’s Implicit Theory Scale. The study of the cognitive sphere of the primary school students involves J. Raven’s progressive matrices test, P. Torrance’s test of creative thinking, and E.E. Tunik’s adaptation of J. Johnson’s creativity scale. Within the framework of the experiment, two blocks of convergent tasks are formed: one including non-verbal transitivity tasks (the logical block) and the other containing volumetric and spatial thinking tasks (the spatial block). It is established that the success of primary school students of both sexes in solving convergent tasks is associated not only with the extrinsic motivational attitude constructed through verbal instruction but also with the specific psychological characteristics of the development of the cognitive and motivational spheres in children. The relationship between the success in solving convergent tasks and the psychological characteristics of cognitive development and the motivational sphere differs for boys and girls of primary school age which manifests most intensely in the level of development of the non-verbal component, the leading motivation, and the specifics of the development of the attributional style of explaining success and failure, as well as its particular components.
Downloads
References
BANDURA, A. Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Co, 1997.
BAREL, E.; TZISCHINSKY, O. Age and sex differences in verbal and visuospatial abilities. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, v. 14, n. 2, p. 51-61, 2018.
BOZHOVICH, L. I. Problemy formirovaniia lichnosti: Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Problems of personality formation: Selected psychological works]. 3. ed. Moscow: Moskovskii psikhologo-sotsialnyi institute, 2001.
CHIKSENTMIKHAII, M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Moscow: Smysl, 2015.
CHIRKOV, V. I. Samodeterminatsiia i vnutrenniaia motivatsiia povedeniia cheloveka [Self-determination and intrinsic motivation of human behavior]. Voprosy psikhologii, n. 3, p. 116-131, 1996.
COLOM, R.; GARCÍA-LÓPEZ, O. Sex differences in fluid intelligence among highschool graduates. Personality and Individual differences, v. 32, n. 3, p. 445-451, 2002.
DALGATOV, M. M. Kauzalnye atributsii dostizhenii kak faktor effektivnosti uchebnoi i pedagogicheskoi deiatelnosti [Causal attribution of achievements as a factor in the effectiveness of educational and pedagogical activities]. 2006. Dissertation (Doctoral in Psychology) – Moscow State University, Moscow, 2006.
DAMRONGPANIT, S. From Modern Teaching to Mathematics Achievement: The Mediating Role of Mathematics Attitude, Achievement Motivation, and Self-Efficacy. European Journal of Educational Research, v. 8, n. 3, p. 713-727, 2019.
DANG, C. P. et al. Unitary or non-unitary nature of working memory? Evidence from its relation to general fluid and crystallized intelligence. Intelligence, v. 40, n. 5, p. 499-508, 2012.
DECI, E. L.; RYAN, R. M. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, n. 49, p. 182-185, 2008.
DERGACHEVA, O. E. Lichnostnaia avtonomiia kak predmet psikhologicheskogo issledovaniia [Personal autonomy as a subject of psychological research]. 2005. Dissertation (PhD in Psychology) – Moscow State University named, Moscow, 2005.
DRUZHININ, V. N. Psikhologiia obshchikh sposobnostei [Psychology of general abilities]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2001.
DUCKWORTH, A. L. et al. Self-control and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, n. 70, p. 373-399, 2019.
DWECK, C. S. Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2000.
DWECK, C. S. et al. Sex differences in learned helplessness: (II) The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and (III) An experimental analysis. Developmental Psychology, n. 14, p. 268-276, 1978.
EREMEEVA, V. D.; KHRIZMAN, T. P. Malchiki i devochki: dva raznykh mira. Neiropsikhologi – uchiteliam, vospitateliam, roditeliam, shkolnym psikhologam [Boys and girls – two different worlds. Neuropsychologists to teachers, educators, parents, school psychologists]. Moscow: Linka-Press, 1998.
FOMINA, T. G.; MOROSANOVA, V. I. Osobennosti vzaimosviazi osoznannoi samoreguliatsii, subektivnogo blagopoluchiia i akademicheskoi uspevaemosti u mladshikh shkolnikov [Specifics of relationship between conscious self-regulation, subjective well-being, and academic achievements of primary schoolchildren]. Eksperimentalnaia psikhologiia, v. 12, n. 3, p. 164-175, 2020.
GAVRILOVA, O. I. A. Uspeshnost resheniia konvergentnykh zadach detmi mladshego shkolnogo vozrasta v usloviiakh razlichnykh vneshnikh motivatsionnykh ustanovok [Success in solving convergent tasks in children of primary school age in the face of various external motivational attitudes]. 2019. Dissertation (Ph.D. in Psychology) – Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, 2019.
GORDEEVA T. O. Psikhologiia motivatsii dostizheniia [Psychology of achievement motivation]. Moscow: Smysl, 2015.
GORDEEVA T. O. et al. Motivatsiia samouvazheniia i uvazheniia drugimi kak faktory akademicheskikh dostizheni i inastoichivosti v uchebnoi deiatelnosti [Motivation of self-respect and respect by others as factors in academic achievement and perseverance in educational activities]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, v. 37, n. 2, p. 57-68, 2016.
HAUSMANN, M. et al. Interactive Effects of Sex Hormones and Gender Stereotypes on Cognitive Sex Differences – a Psychobiosocial Approach. Psychoneuroendocrinology, v. 34, n. 3, p. 389-401, 2009.
IRVINE, J. A. Framework for comparing theories related to motivation in education. Research in Higher Education Journal, n. 35, p. 1-30, 2018.
KIM, K. H. Can only intelligent people be creative? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, v. XVI, n. 2/3, p. 57-66, 2005.
KON, I. S. Istoriia i teoriia muzhskikh issledovanii [History and theory of men’s studies]. In: MALYSHEVA, M. M. (Ed.). Gendernyi kaleidoskop. Kurs lektsii. Moscow: Academia, 2002. p. 188-242.
KRIVOVA, V. A. Subektivnaia otsenka sobstvennykh uspekhov i neudach kak faktor kognitivnogo razvitiia mladshikh shkolnikov [Subjective evaluation of one’s success and failure as a factor in cognitive development of elementary school students]. Dissertation (Ph.D. in Psychology) – Moscow state pedagogical university, Moscow, 2013.
LEONTIEV, A. N. Potrebnosti, motivy i emotsii [Needs, motives and emotions]. In: GIPPENREITER, I. B.; FALIKMAN, M.V. (Eds.). Psikhologiia motivatsi i iemotsii. 2. ed. Moscow: Omega-L, 2006. p. 57-79.
LEONTIEV, D. A. Psikhologiia svobody: k postanovke problemy samodeterminatsii lichnosti [Psychology of freedom: to the formulation of the problem of self-determination of personality]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, v. 21, n. 1, p. 15-25, 2000.
LUBART, T. I. et al. Introduction to the special issue “intelligence, creativity and giftedness”. Learning and Individual Differences, n. 52, p. 120, 2016.
MACCANN, C. Further examination of emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence: a latent variable analysis of fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, v. 49, n. 5, p. 490-496, 2010.
MAITLAND, S. B. et al. Gender differences and changes in cognitive abilities across the adult life span. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, n. 7, p. 32-53, 2000.
MARGOLIS, A. A. et al. Intellekt, kreativnost i uspeshnost resheniia zadach uchashchimisia srednegoshkolnogo vozrasta v kompiuternoi igre “PLines” [Intelligence, creativity, and performance in the “PLines” computer game in middle school age students]. Eksperimentalnaia psikhologiia, v. 13, n. 1, p. 122-137, 2020.
MATIUSHKIN, A. M. Psikhologiia myshleniia. Myshlenie kak razreshenie problemnykh situatsii: uchebnoe posobie [Psychology of thinking. Thinking as solving problem situations: a training manual]. Moscow: ID “Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia”, 2017.
MOÈ, A. Mental rotation and mathematics: gender-stereotyped beliefs and relationships in primary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, n. 61, p. 172-180, 2018.
RADINA, N. K.; NIKITINA, A. A. Sotsialnaia psikhologiia muzhestvennosti: sotsialno-konstruktivistskii podkhod [The social psychology of masculinity: a socio-constructivist approach]. Moscow: Borges, 2011.
RENZULLI, D. Z. H. Model obogashchennogo shkolnogo obucheniia [Model of enriched school education]. In: RENZULLI, D.Z.H.; RIS, S.; BOGOIAVLENSKAIA, D. B. (Eds.). Osnovnye kontseptsii odarennosti i tvorchestva. Moscow: Akademiia, 1997.
RODÁN, A. et al. Boys and girls gain in spatial, but not in mathematical ability after mental rotation training in primary education. Learning and Individual Differences, n. 70, p. 1-11, 2019.
SAVENKOV, A. Theoretical Model of Preschoolers’ Social Intelligence Development. EC Psychology and Psychiatry, n. 8.3, p. 206-211, 2019a.
SAVENKOV, A. I. Psikhologiia detskoi odarennosti [The Psychology of Childhood Giftedness]: textbook. Moscow: Iurait, 2019b.
SELIGMAN, M. E. Learned optimism: how to change your mind and your life. New York: Vintage Books, 2006.
SEMENOVA, T. S. Pedagogicheskoe obshchenie uchitelia nachalnykh klassov s uchenikami kak faktor blagopoluchiia mladshikh shkolnikov v uchebnoi deiatelnosti [Pedagogical communication of a primary school teacher with students as a factor in the well-being of primary schoolchildren in educational activities]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniia, v. 12, n. 1, p. 44-58, 2020.
SHUMAKOVA, N. B. Poznavatelnaia aktivnost i kreativnost mladshikh shkolnikov s vysokimi intellektualnymi sposobnostiami v raznykh obrazovatelnykh sredakh [Cognitive activity and creativity of junior schoolchildren with high intellectual abilities in different educational environments]. Psychological-Educational Studies, v. 11, n. 1, p. 57-69, 2019.
TIKHOMIROV, O. K. Psikhologiia myshleniia: uchebnoe posobie dlia studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii [Psychology of thinking: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions]. Moscow: Izdatelskii tsentr Akademiia, 2007.
TUOMINEN, H. et al. Motivation across a transition: Changes in achievement goal orientations and academic well-being from elementary to secondary school. Learning and Individual Differences, v. 79, 2020.
WEINER, B. An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. É vedada a submissão integral ou parcial do manuscrito a qualquer outro periódico. A responsabilidade do conteúdo dos artigos é exclusiva dos autores. É vedada a tradução para outro idioma sem a autorização escrita do Editor ouvida a Comissão Editorial Científica.