High school administrators’ and teachers’ perspective of evaluation criteria for action research in the field of education

Van-Trung  Tran; Anh-Chuong Huynh-Lam; Ngoc-Bich Vu-Thi

doi:10.22633/rpge.v26i00.16085

Autores/as

Van-Trung Tran Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong Province – Vietnam
Anh-Chuong Huynh-Lam Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City – Vietnam
Ngoc-Bich Vu-Thi Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong Province – Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.16085

Resumen

La investigación-acción se convierte en un método y estrategia de desarrollo profesional apropiado y efectivo para promover la indagación del conocimiento y la solución del problema que lleva a la acción o al cambio. Los docentes que participen en la investigación-acción podrían obtener una mejor percepción de sí mismos como docentes, estar motivados para un crecimiento profesional continuo y aumentar su confianza en sí mismos como profesionales. El principal objetivo aquí es examinar las percepciones de los administradores y profesores de secundaria sobre la necesidad de criterios de evaluación para la investigación acción pedagógica. Esta investigación encuestó a 255 encuestados, incluidos 16 administradores y 239 maestros de escuelas secundarias en la provincia de Binh Duong, Vietnam, con el cuestionario de 11 elementos. El hallazgo principal indicó que todos los administradores y docentes de escuelas secundarias que participaron están totalmente de acuerdo en que la novedad, la eficacia y la aplicabilidad son criterios necesarios para evaluar la calidad de la investigación acción pedagógica en Vietnam. Nuestro estudio contribuye a la discusión general sobre los criterios necesarios y apropiados para evaluar la calidad de la investigación acción pedagógica en Vietnam.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Van-Trung Tran, Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong Province – Vietnam

Office of Postgraduate Academic Affair.

Anh-Chuong Huynh-Lam, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City – Vietnam

Faculty of Science Education. Faculty of Education, Thu Dau Mot University.

Ngoc-Bich Vu-Thi, Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong Province – Vietnam

Faculty of Management Science.

Citas

ABELARDO, L. J. et al. Challenges Encountered by the National High School Teachers in Doing Action Research. International Journal of English, Literature and Social Science, v. 4, n. 4, p. 1046-1051, 2019.

ANH, V. T. K. Evaluating the implementation of action research course in an in-service teacher training program in Vietnam. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), v. 2, n. 2, p. 88-97, 2017.

BARCELONA, A. B. An Analytic Hierarchy Process for Quality Action Researches in Education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, v. 9, n. 3, p. 517-523, 2020.

BOYER, E. L. et al. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

CASANOVA, U. Research and Practice: We Can Integrate Them. NEA Today, v. 7, n. 6, p. 44-49, 1989.

CHEVALIER, J. M.; BUCKLES, D. J. Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. Routledge. 2019.

DARLING-HAMMOND, L. The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational researcher, v. 25, n. 6, p. 5-17, 1996.

FAZIO, X.; MELVILLE, W. Science teacher development through collaborative action research. Teacher Development, v. 12, n. 3, p. 193-209, 2008.

FELDMAN, A. Validity and quality in action research. Educational Action Research, v. 15, n. 1, p. 21-32, 2007.

GOODNOUGH, K. Teacher development through action research: A case study of an elementary teacher. Action in Teacher Education, v. 23, n. 1, p. 37-46, 2001.

HALIM, L.; MEERAH, T. S. M.; BUANG, N. A. Developing pre-service science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through action research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 9, p. 507-511, 2010.

JOHNSON, A. P. A short guide to action research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. 2008.

LARI, P. et al. Action research. Technology and Engineering Teacher, v. 79, n. 2, p. 23-27, 2019.

LEWIN, K. Action research and minority problems. Journal of social issues, v. 2, n. 4, p. 34-46, 1946.

LIEBERMAN, A. Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Innovating and evaluating science education, v. 95, n. 64, p. 67-78, 1995.

LOMAX, P.; EVANS, M. Working in partnership to implement teacher research. Routledge, 2002.

MCINTOSH, P. Action research and reflective practice: Creative and visual methods to facilitate reflection and learning, Routledge. 2010.

MERTLER, C. A. Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators. Sage Publications. 2019.

MEYER, J. Evaluating action research. Age and ageing, v. 29(suppl_2), p. 8-10. 2000.

OBERG, A.; MCCUTCHEON, G. Teachers' experience doing action research. Peabody Journal of Education, v. 64, n. 2, p. 116-127, 1987.

ROCK, T. Professional development through teacher action research: Is there continued impact on teaching practices. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE EASTERN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, 1997, Tampa. Proceedings […]. Tampa, FL, 1997.

ROSAEN, C.; SCHRAM, P. Professional development for beginning teachers through practical inquiry. Educational Action Research, v. 5, n. 2, p. 255-281, 1997.

ROWELL, L. L. et al. Action researchers' perspectives about the distinguishing characteristics of action research: a Delphi and learning circles mixed-methods study. Educational Action Research, v. 23, n. 2, p. 243-270, 2015.

SHALAWAY, L. Tap into Teacher Research. Instructor, v. 100, n. 1, p. 34-38, 1990.

STERN, T. What is good Action Research? Reflections about quality criteria. In: Action Research, Innovation and Change. Routledge, 2013. p. 218-236.

SUBIA, G. S. Think Like My Teacher (TLMT): A New Method in Assessing Millennial Learners. International Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, v. 3, n. 1, p. 57-61, 2018.

TINDOWEN, D. J.; GUZMAN, J.; MACANANG, D. Teachers' conception and difficulties in doing action research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, v. 7, n. 8, p. 1787-1794, 2019. DOI:10.13189/ujer.2019.070817

ULLA, M. B. Benefits and challenges of doing research: Experiences from Philippine public school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, v. 28, n. 3, p. 797-810, 2018.

ULLA, M. B.; BARRERA, K. I. B.; ACOMPANADO, M. M. Philippine classroom teachers as researchers: Teachers' perceptions, motivations, and challenges. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), v. 42, n. 11, p. 52-64, 2017.

VAN, P. T. T. Employing action research for professional development of EFL college teachers in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. European Journal of Education Studies, v. 7, p. 10, 2020. DOI: 10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3292

YATES, L. What does good education research look like? Situating a field and its practices. McGraw-Hill Education, UK, 2004.

YIGIT, C.; BAGCECI, B. Teachers' Opinions Regarding the Usage of Action Research in Professional Development. Journal of Education and Training Studies, v. 5, n. 20, p. 243-252, 2017.

ZUBER-SKERRIT, O.; FLETHER, M. The Quality of an Action Research Thesis in the Social Sciences. Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, v. 15, n. 4, p. 413-436, 2007.