Aprendizagem de projetos com base cultural
melhorando a alfabetização científica de alunos do ensino fundamental por meio da contextualização Toba Batak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp4.20773Palavras-chave:
Aprendizagem baseada na cultura, Aprendizagem baseada em projetos, Alfabetização científica, Cultura Toba Batak, Ensino fundamentalResumo
Este estudo examinou a eficácia da Aprendizagem por Projetos Baseada na Cultura (APBC) na melhoria da alfabetização científica de alunos do ensino fundamental, integrando práticas culturais Toba Batak ao ensino baseado em projetos. Fundamentada na educação construtivista e culturalmente responsiva, a APBC conectou conceitos científicos a tradições locais, como tecelagem, rituais em ecossistemas lacustres e o uso de materiais naturais. Um estudo quase-experimental com metodologia mista envolveu 56 alunos do quinto ano, divididos em grupos experimental e de controle. A alfabetização científica foi avaliada por meio de um teste validado que abrangia indicadores conceituais, procedimentais e contextuais. Os resultados mostraram pontuações significativamente mais altas para o grupo experimental em comparação com o grupo de controle. Dados qualitativos obtidos por meio de observações e entrevistas revelaram maior engajamento, colaboração e apreciação cultural entre os alunos que aprenderam por meio da APBC. As descobertas indicam que a integração de contextos culturais locais aprimora a compreensão científica, ao mesmo tempo que fortalece os vínculos entre o conhecimento tradicional e o raciocínio científico. A APBC oferece um modelo promissor para o ensino de ciências contextualizado em ambientes culturalmente diversos.
Downloads
Referências
Anastácio, Z. C., Silva, T. C. da, Antão, C. M., Braide, A. S. G., Battisti, I. D. E., & Carvalho, G. S. (2023). Influence of Human Biology and Health (HBH) teaching–learning process on students’ conceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine. Sustainability, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010041
Blackie, M., & Tech, V. (2024). Indigenous knowledge systems and science education. South African Journal of Science, 120(5/6). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2024/16860
Broderick, N. (2025). Exploring different visions of scientific literacy in Irish primary science education: Core issues and future directions. Irish Educational Studies, 44(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2230191
Cabello, V. M., Zúñiga, C. G., Valbuena, C. A., Manrique, F., Albarrán, M. J., & Moncada-Arce, A. (2024). “We are not being taught sustainable citizenship!”: Podcasts for critical science literacy in teacher education. LUMAT, 12(2), 18–49. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.2.2135
Dewi, N. P. S. R., & Wibawa, I. M. C. (2024). Enhancing students’ science literacy through Megedong-Gedongan: A Balinese local culture-based flipbook. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n4p331
El Islami, R. A. Z., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Comparative study of scientific literacy: Indonesian and Thai pre-service science teachers report. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20355
Eliza, D., Mulyeni, T., Budayawan, K., Hartati, S., & Khairiah, F. (2024). Creation of cultural local wisdom-based picture-science stories application for the introduction of scientific literacy for early childhood. International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(1), 417–424. http://www.joiv.org/index.php/joiv
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
He, L., Chen, Y., Xiong, X., Zou, X., & Lai, K. (2021). Does science literacy guarantee resistance to health rumors? The moderating effect of self-efficacy of science literacy in the relationship between science literacy and rumor belief. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052243
Ijatuyi, E. J., Lamm, A., Yessoufou, K., Suinyuy, T., & Patrick, H. O. (2025). Integration of indigenous knowledge with scientific knowledge: A systematic review. Environmental Science and Policy, 170. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104119
Kartini, F. S., Widodo, A., & Winarno, N. (2021). STEM project-based learning on student’s STEM literacy: The case of teaching earth layer and disaster. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012221
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1).
Margolis, A. A. (2021). New science literacy: Problems and difficulties of formation. Psychology Science and Education, 26(6), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260601
Mikropoulos, T. A., & Iatraki, G. (2023). Digital technology supports science education for students with disabilities: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 3911–3935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11317-9
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
Nurcahyani, D., Yuberti, Irwandani, Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Ethnoscience learning on science literacy of physics material to support environment: A meta-analysis research. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012094
Safrizal, S., Sudarmono, & Yulia, R. (2022). Developing students’ science literacy in Adiwiyata School: Case study in Padang City, Indonesia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.169
Salinas, I., Guerrero, G., Satlov, M., & Hidalgo, P. (2022). Climate change in Chile’s school science curriculum. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215212
Simoes, E., Foz, A., Petinati, F., Marques, A., Sato, J., Lepski, G., & Arévalo, A. (2022). Neuroscience knowledge and endorsement of neuromyths among educators: What is the scenario in Brazil? Brain Sciences, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060734
Sparks, R. A., Jimenez, P. C., Kirby, C. K., & Dauer, J. M. (2022). Using critical integrative argumentation to assess socioscientific argumentation across decision-making contexts. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100644
Tobin, K., & Alexakos, K. (2021). Global challenges need attention now: Educating humanity for wellness and sustainability. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(3), 651–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10080-6
Welsch, H. (2022). What shapes cognitions of climate change in Europe? Ideology, morality, and the role of educational attainment. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 12(2), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00745-7
Wu, X. B., Sandoval, C., Knight, S., Jaime, X., Macik, M., & Schielack, J. F. (2021). Web-based authentic inquiry experiences in large introductory classes consistently associated with significant learning gains for all students. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00290-3
Yore, L. D., Chinn, P. W., & Hand, B. (2008). Editorial. Science literacy for all: Influences of culture, language, and knowledge about nature and naturally occurring events. L1–Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(1).
Zainuri, A., Sukarno, & Huda, M. (2022). Understanding scientific literacy and pedagogy competence: A critical insight into religious integration thinking skills. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(1), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0022
Zeyer, A., & Arnold, J. (2021). The three-talk model: Getting both evidence and preferences into a pre-service teacher health workshop. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413937
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. É vedada a submissão integral ou parcial do manuscrito a qualquer outro periódico. A responsabilidade do conteúdo dos artigos é exclusiva dos autores. É vedada a tradução para outro idioma sem a autorização escrita do Editor ouvida a Comissão Editorial Científica.


