Responsive processes in the design, implementation and evaluation of programs for improving the quality of coexistence in schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26iesp.3.16960Keywords:
Responsiveness, Living together, Programs, Public policyAbstract
Responsiveness means, in an intentional way, to create conditions to continuously scan and analyze situations and processes, collect expectations, opinions and necessities from people that receive or implement a program and, in the most open, agile and powerful possible way to react, modify actions, include new agents, invite for participation, and collectively construct a better program for everyone in every context. The objective of this paper is to discuss contributions of responsive processes in complex programs as well as to describe kinds and levels of responsiveness as those used in the program “Ethical Coexistence at School” facilitating the transposition to larger scale programs and to public policies.
Downloads
References
ALARCÃO, I. Reflexão crítica sobre o pensamento de D. Schön e os programas de formação de professores. Revista da Faculdade de Educação, São Paulo, v. 22, n. 2, p. 11–42, 1996. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rfe/article/view/33577. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2020.
ANDREWS, M.; PRITCHETT, L.; WOOLCOCK, M. Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Disponível em: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31857. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2020.
BRYSON, J. M. et al. Leading Social Transformations: Creating Public Value and Advancing the Common Good. Journal of Change Management, v. 21, n. 2, p. 180–202, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14697017.2021.1917492. Acesso em: 09 jul. 2020.
CAMPOS, S. B. A responsividade no Programa “A Convivência Ética na Escola”: um olhar para a transformação. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) – Faculdade de Educação, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 2020.
DELORS, J. Learning: The Treasure within. Paris: Unesco, 1998.
ELMORE, R. F. Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice. Harvard Educational Review, v. 66, n. 1, p. 1–27, 1996. Disponível em: https://meridian.allenpress.com/her/article-abstract/66/1/1/31675/Getting-to-Scale-with-Good-Educational-Practice. Acesso em: 23 jul. 2020.
FISHMAN, B. et al. Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. National Society of the Study of Educaiton, v. 112, n. 2, p. 136–156, 2013. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/016146811311501415. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2020.
HABERMAS, J. Consciência moral e agir comunicativo. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 2003.
INDEPENDENT GROUP EVALUATION. The World Bank Group Outcome Orientation at the Country LevelThe World Bank Group Outcome Orientation at the Country Level. Nova Hampshire: World Bank, 2020.
LIPSKY, M. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell New York: Sage Foundation, 2010.
MATLAND, R. E. Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 5, n. 2, p. 145–174, 1995. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article-abstract/5/2/145/880350?login=false. Acesso em: 09 maio 2021.
MAZZUCATO, M. Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 27, n. 5, p. 803–815, 2018. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/icc/article/27/5/803/5127692?login=true. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2020.
MORIN, E. Ensinar a viver: Manifesto para mudar a educação. Porto Alegre: Meridional/ Sulina, 2015.
NUNES, C. A. A.; VINHA, T. P. Large scale principle-based transformations with embedded knowledge building processes. Singapore: Knowledge Building Summer Institute, 2016.
PATTON, M. Q. Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford Publications, 2010.
PERKINS, D. What is Understanding? In: WISKE, M. S. Teaching for Understanding. Linking Research with Practice. The Jossey-Bass Education Series, 1998.
PELLIZZONI, L. The myth of the best argument: Power, deliberation and reason. The British Journal of Sociology, v. 52, n. 1, p. 59–86, 2001. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00071310020023037. Acesso em: 09 fev. 2021.
REIMERS, F. M. Educating Students to Improve the World. Singapore: SpringerBriefs in Education, 2020. Disponível em: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/37361. Acesso em: 16 set. 2021.
RITTEL, H. W. J.; WEBBER, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, v. 4, n. 2, p. 155–169, 1973. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf01405730. Acesso em: 16 out. 2021.
SELMAN, R. L. Level of Social Perspective Taking and the Development of Empathy in Children: Speculations from a Social‐Cognitive Viewpoint. Journal of Moral Education, v. 5, n. 1, p. 35–43, 2006. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0305724750050105. Acesso em: 09 nov. 2021.
SINEK, S. The infinite game. Londres: Penguin, 2019.
SNOWDEN, D. J.; BOONE, M. E. A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2007. Disponível em: https://www.systemswisdom.com/sites/default/files/Snowdon-and-Boone-A-Leader's-Framework-for-Decision-Making_0.pdf. Acesso em: 22 jun. 2021.
SNOWDEN, D.; GREENBERG, R.; BERTSCH, B. Cynefin weaving sense-making into the fabric of our world. Singapure: Cognitive Edge Pte, 2020.
SØRENSEN, E.; TORFING, J. Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance? Public Management Review, v. 23, n. 11, p. 1–22, 2021. Disponível em: 15 nov. 2021.
STAKE, R. E. Standards-Based & Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publicarions, 2004.
STUFFLEBEAM, D. Evaluation Models. New Directions for Evaluation, v. 2001, n. 89, p. 7–98, 2001. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ev.3. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2021.
UNESCO. Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO, 2021.
VINHA, T. P. et al. Da escola para a vida em sociedade: O valor da convivência democrática. Americana: Adonis, 2017.
VINHA, T. P. et al. Avaliação responsiva em transformações profundas: O caso do programa Jovem de Futuro. São Paulo: Instituto Unibanco, 2020.
VINHA, T. P. et al. A educação para o desenvolvimento da autonomia e a militarização das escolas públicas: Uma análise da psicologia moral. In: ABRAMOVAY, M.; FIGUEIREDO, E.; SILVA, A. P.; SALES, M. V. (org.). Reflexões sobre convivências e violências nas escolas. 1. ed. Brasília, DF: FLACSO, 2021a.
VINHA, T. P. et al. Sustentabilidade em programas educacionais: Elementos para sua construção. São Paulo: Instituto Unibanco, 2021b.
VINHA, T. P.; NUNES, C. A. A.; TOGNETTA, L. R. P. Convivência ética: Um programa de transformação em escolas públicas. In: ASSIS, O. Z. M. (org.). A educação do século XXI à luz do construtivismo piagetiano. Campinas: FE/Unicamp, 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. É vedada a submissão integral ou parcial do manuscrito a qualquer outro periódico. A responsabilidade do conteúdo dos artigos é exclusiva dos autores. É vedada a tradução para outro idioma sem a autorização escrita do Editor ouvida a Comissão Editorial Científica.
