Economics of education: Interaction of local self-government bodies and prosecutor's office

George A. Efimov; Marina V. Markhgeym; Kseniya A. Mokrousova; Ol'ga Yu. Shemetova; Daniel' A. Otuzyan

doi:10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17400

Authors

George A. Efimov Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1986-5250
Marina V. Markhgeym Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0435-6552
Kseniya A. Mokrousova Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-1333
Ol'ga Yu. Shemetova Prosecutor's Office of the Belgorod Region, Belgorod, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-499X
Daniel' A. Otuzyan Pyatigorsk state University, Pyatigorsk, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1406-4078

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17400

Keywords:

Economics of education, Local self-government, Interaction, Independence, Management

Abstract

The economics of education is the investigation of economic matters connected to education, such as the requirement for education and the financing and provision of education. Hence, this work analyzes foreign experience in the constitutional regulation of the relations between local governments and the prosecutor's office on the example of the CIS countries regarding educational requirements. The author has isolated independent models and options regarding the constitutional provisions of interaction between local governments and the prosecutor's office. The conclusion is made about the impossibility of a positive or negative assessment of constitutional regulation degree in respect of the interaction between local self-government bodies and the prosecutor's office in the CIS member states for the reasons of a differentiated approach of states to the institution of local self-government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alla Yu. Kornyushkina, Marina V. Markhgeym, Alevtina E. Novikova,Ol'ga N. Doronina, Sergej Yu. Zajcev (2017). Minimization of human rights risks: the constitutional legal experience of post-soviet states. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication TOJDAC. April. Special Edition: 352-356.

Anna Minasyan, Marina Markhgeym, Aleksandr Plohih, Olga Lepeshkina, Vyacheslav Rasskazov (2019). Typical constitutional spheres of interaction among parliament chambers in the Asian countries. REVISTA INCLUSIONES. VOLUMEN 6. NÚMEROE SPECIAL–ABRIL/JUNIO: 99-105

Bahtybaev I.ZH. 2005. Prokuratura v pravovoj sisteme Respubliki Kazahstan. Pravozashchitnoe prednaznachenie organov prokuratury na sovremennom etape. Alma-Aty: Edel'vejs: 57-63. (In Russian)

Belyaeva, Galina S.; Belousova, Ksenia A.; Abgarov, Stepan S.; Kornev, Arkady V. y Zmerzly, Boris V. 2019. Main approaches to the definition of essence of a state power: evolution and current state. Revista Inclusiones. Vol. 6: 150-156.

Burtsev A.S., Genzyuk E.E., Lukyanchikova E.F., Mironuk I.V., Marina L. (2018). Prokhorova Legal certainty of legality principle in the legislation of the continental and anglo-american system // The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication – TOJDAC. March Special Edition: 231-234.

https://worldconstitutions.ru/

Istoriya prokuratury v dokumentah; www.Iaw.vl.ru.

Kaldybaj Uulu Mirlan 2004. Prokurorskij nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov v ugolovno-processual'noj deyatel'nosti organov predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M.: 27. (In Russian)

Ludmila I. Nikonova, Marina V. Markhgeym, Alevtina E. Novikova, Anna A. Minasyan, Natalya N. Kurova (2017). Constitutional Spheres and Forms of Interaction among Chamber in Modern Parliaments. Journal of Politics and Law. Vol. 10. № 4: 201-206.

Marina V. Markhgeym, Oksana A. Morozova, Ludmila I. Nikonova, Marina S. Savchenko, Grigory M. Sukhodolsky (2018). Interaction principle: doctrinal strokes to constitutional alternates. Helix. Vol. 8(4): 3511-3514.

Mikhail B. Rumyantsev, Vitaly V. Penskoy, Olga V. Batova, Sergey Yu. Sumenkov, Vladislav Yu. Turanin (2019). Opinion of the people and the supreme power: about the nature of the relationship between the sovereign and his nationals in Russia in the middle of the XVI century. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. Año: VI Número: 3 Artículo no.: 94.

Safonova T.YU. 2011. K voprosu o pravovom polozhenii prokuratury kak gosudarstvennogo organa v stranah SNG (na primere respublik Armeniya, Ukraina, Belorussiya, Kazahstan, Kyrgyzstan). Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. № 3: 36-39. (In Russian)

Saida G. Dzybova, Marina V. Markhgeym, Anna A. Minasyan, Aleksandr N. Plohih, Nina V. Stus (2018). Typical constitutional forms of interaction between the foreign parliament chambers. Revista Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 7. Núm. 12: 181-186.

Sapargaliev G.S. 2005. Mesto i rol' prokuratury v mekhanizme gosudarstva. Pravozashchitnoe prednaznachenie organov prokuratury na sovremennom etape: Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Almaty, 23-24 noyabrya 2004 g. Almaty: Edel'vejs. (In Russian)

SHCHerba S.P., Reshetnikov T.A., Zajcev O.A. 2007. Prokuratura v stranah SNG. M.: Ekzamen: 557. (In Russian)

ZHursimbaev S.K. 2003. Prokurorskij nadzor v Kazahstane. Alma-aty: 303. (In Russian)