Capital da ciência

Uma revisão sistemática de pesquisas entre 2015-2021

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v17i3.15633

Palavras-chave:

Pierre Bourdieu, Engajamento da ciência, Letramento científico

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta uma revisão qualitativa de pesquisas sobre o capital da ciência considerando 51 estudos com temas relacionados a esse conceito, entre 2015 e 2021. Além do aumento de pesquisas evidenciado pelo número de publicações sobre o tema nesse período, e o domínio do Reino Unido nas pesquisas de ponta na área, observamos que os temas associados ao capital da ciência variam desde a escolha de carreiras na ciência, passando pela identificação com a ciência, pela promoção de uma cultura cientifica, até o papel da escola no desenvolvimento do capital da ciência e as formas de avaliá-lo. É comum que o engajamento com a ciência, associado ao capital da ciência, seja percebido por meio do alinhamento de três importantes conceitos Bourdieusianos: capital, habitus e campo. Nesse sentido, devido à relevância que o tema tem tido na pesquisa científica, afirmamos a importância de uma revisão sistemática que possa fornecer um panorama das investigações atuais envolvendo o capital da ciência.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

José Luís Ferraro, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

Docente no Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação em Ciências e Matemática. Doutorado em Educação (PUCRS). Bolsista Produtividade PQ-2 do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Gabriela Sehnem Heck, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutoranda em Educação. Mestre em Educação em Ciências e Matemática (PUCRS).

Referências

ARCHER, L. et al. “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 52, n. 7, p. 922-948, 2015. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/tea.21227. Acesso em: 22 jun. 2021.

ARCHER, L. et al. Disorientating, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families’ experiences of a science museum visit. Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 11, n. 4, p. 917-939, 2016. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11422-015-9667-7. Acesso em: 06 jun. 2021.

ARCHER, L. et al. Stratifying science: A Bourdieusian analysis of student views and experiences of school selective practices in relation to ‘Triple Science’ at KS4 in England. ReseaRch PaPeRs in education, v. 32, n. 3, p. 296-315, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02671522.2016.1219382. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2021.

ARCHER, L. et al. Can the subaltern ‘speak’ science? An intersectional analysis of performances of ‘talking science through muscular intellect’ by ‘subaltern’ students in UK urban secondary science classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 14, n. 3, p. 723-751, 2019. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11422-018-9870-4. Acesso em: 11 maio 2021.

ARCHER, L.; DEWITT, J. Science aspirations and gender identity: Lessons from the ASPIRES project. In: HENRIKSEN, E.; DILLON, J.; RYDER, J. Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.

ARCHER, L.; DEWITT, J.; OSBORNE, J. Is science for us? Black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careers. Science Education, v. 99, n. 2, p. 199-237, 2015. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sce.21146. Acesso em: 23 out. 2021.

ARCHER, L.; DEWITT, J.; WILLIS, B. Adolescent boys’ science aspirations: Masculinity, capital and power. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1-30, 2014. Availabe in: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.21122. Acesso em: 19 set. 2021.

BANNER, I. Valuing difference in students’ culture and experience in school science lessons. Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 11, n. 4, p. 1071-1079, 2016. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11422-016-9729-5. Acesso em: 21 out. 2021.

BLACK, L.; HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, P. Re-thinking science capital: The role of ‘capital’ and ‘identity’ in mediating students’ engagement with mathematically demanding programmes at university. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: International Journal of the IMA, v. 35, n. 3, p. 131-143, Sept. 2016. Disponível em: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8237126. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2021.

BOURDIEU, P. Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d'éthnologie kabyle. Geneva: Droz, 1972.

BOURDIEU, P. La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progrès de la raison. Sociologie et sociétés, v. 7, n. 1, p. 91-118, 1975. Disponível em: https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/socsoc/1900-v1-n1-socsoc122/001089ar/abstract/. Access em: 13 out. 2020.

BOURDIEU, P. Le champ scientifique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, v. 2, n. 2, p. 88-104, 1976. Disponível em: https://www.persee.fr/doc/arss_0335-5322_1976_num_2_2_3454. Access em: 15 out. 2020.

BOURDIEU, P. La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 1979.

BOURDIEU, P. Usos sociais da ciência. São Paulo: Unesp, 2003.

BOURDIEU, P.; PASSERON, J. C. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications, 1990.

CEGLIE, R. Science faculty's support for underrepresented students: Building science capital. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v. 19, p. 661-679, 2020. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10763-020-10090-w. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2021.

CERRATO, S. et al. A coding lab to increase science capital of school dropout teenagers. Journal of Science Communication, v. 7, n. 4, p. 1-13, 2018. Disponível em: https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/17/04/JCOM_1704_2018_N03. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2021.

CHRISTIDOU, D.; PAPAVLASOPOULOU, S.; GIANNAKOS, M. Using the lens of science capital to capture and explore children’s attitudes toward science in an informal making-based space. Information and Learning Sciences, v. 122, n. 5/6, p. 317-340, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ILS-09-2020-0210/full/html. Acesso em: 18 mar. 2021.

CONLAN, M. Embracing ‘science capital’: An investigation into the approaches and initiatives established by a post-primary school to promote the uptake of STEM related subjects and subsequently STEM related careers with a particular focus on how this is helping to reduce the gender imbalance. The STeP Journal, v. 3, n. 1, p. 111-133, 2016. Disponível em: https://ojs.cumbria.ac.uk/index.php/step/article/view/312. Acesso em: 09 jul. 2021.

COOPER G.; BERRY A. Demographic predictors of senior secondary participation in biology, physics, chemistry and earth/space sciences: Students’ access to cultural, social and science capital. International Journal of Science Education, v. 42, n. 1, p. 151-166, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2019.1708510. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2021.

CURTIS, V. Realising the Potential of Online Citizen Science. In: CURTIS, V. Online Citizen Science and the Widening of Academia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018a.

CURTIS, V. Who Takes Part in Online Citizen Science? In: CURTIS, V. Online Citizen Science and the Widening of Academia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018b.

DAWSON, E. Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups. Public Understanding of Science, v. 27, n. 7, p. 772-786, 2018. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662517750072. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2021.

DEWITT, J.; ARCHER, L. Participation in informal science learning experiences: The rich get richer? International Journal of Science Education, Part b, v. 7, n. 4, p. 356-373, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21548455.2017.1360531. Acesso em: 18 out. 2021.

DEWITT, J.; ARCHER, L. Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, v. 37, n. 13, p. 2170-2192, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899. Acesso em: 18 out. 2021.

DEWITT, J.; ARCHER, L.; MAU, A. Dimensions of science capital: exploring its potential for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, v. 38, n. 16, p. 2431-2449, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520. Acesso em: 15 set. 2021.

DEWITT, J.; NOMIKOU, E.; GODEC, S. Recognizing and valuing student engagement in science museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, v. 34, n. 2, p. 183-200, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09647775.2018.1514276. Acesso em: 06 jan. 2021.

DIAMOND, A. H. The social reproduction of science education outcomes for high school students in Israel. British Journal of Sociology of Education, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1029-1046, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01425692.2020.1806040. Acesso em: 09 jun. 2021.

DU, X.; WONG, B. Science career aspiration and science capital in China and UK: A comparative study using PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, v. 41, n. 15, p. 2136-2155, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2019.1662135. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2021.

GODEC, S. et al. Examining student engagement with science through a Bourdieusian notion of field. Science & Education, v. 27, n. 5-6, p. 501-521, 2018. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-018-9988-5. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2021.

GODEC, S.; ARCHER, L.; DAWSON, E. Interested but not being served: Mapping young people’s participation in informal STEM education through an equity lens. Research Papers in Education, v. 2, p. 1-28, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02671522.2020.1849365. Acesso em: 06 mar. 2021.

GONSALVES, A. J. et al. “Anybody can do science if they're brave enough”: Understanding the role of science capital in science majors' identity trajectories into and through postsecondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, p. 1-35, 2021. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.21695. Acesso em: 03 mar. 2021.

HENRIKSEN, E. K.; DILLON, J.; PELLEGRINI, G. Improving participation in science and technology higher education: Ways forward. In: HENRIKSEN, E.; DILLON, J.; RYDER, J. Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.

JENSEN, E.; WRIGHT, D. Critical response to archer et al. (2015) science capital: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Science Education, v. 99, n. 6, p. 1143-1146, 2015. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sce.21208. Acesso em: 22 set. 2021.

JONES, D.; SPICER, S. Science capital in primary PGCE students: Factors influencing its development and its impact on science teaching. Science Teacher Education, n. 85, p. 9-15, 2019. Disponível em: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/72686/. Acesso em: 09 jul. 2022.

JONES, M. G. et al. The Development and Validation of a Measure of Science capital, Habitus, and Future Science Interests. Research in Science Education, n. 51, p. 1549-1565, 2020. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-020-09916-y. Acesso em: 05 jun. 2021.

JONES, M. G. et al. Understanding science career aspirations: Factors predicting future science task value. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 58, n. 7, p. 937-955, 2021. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.21687. Acesso em: 06 set. 2021.

KING, H. et al. Teachers’ understanding and operationalisation of ‘science capital’. International Journal of Science Education, v. 37, n. 18, p. 2987-3014, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2015.1119331. Acesso em: 21 ago. 2021.

KING, H.; NOMIKOU, E. Fostering critical teacher agency: The impact of a science capital pedagogical approach. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, v. 26, n. 1, p. 87-103, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14681366.2017.1353539. Acesso em: 25 jul. 2021.

LIVESEY, M.; HOATH, L. Using homework to develop science capital. School Science Review, v. 100, n. 372, p. 41-43, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.ase.org.uk/resources/school-science-review/issue-372/using-homework-develop-science-capital. Acesso em: 09 jul. 2022.

MENDICK, H.; BERGE, M.; DANIELSSON, A. A critique of the STEM pipeline: Young people’s identities in Sweden and science education policy. British Journal of Educational Studies, v. 65, n. 4, p. 481-497, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00071005.2017.1300232. Acesso em: 05 jun. 2021.

MOOTE, J. et al. Who has high science capital? An exploration of emerging patterns of science capital among students aged 17/18 in England. Research Papers in Education, p. 1-21, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02671522.2019.1678062. Acesso em: 08 maio 2021.

MOOTE, J. et al. Science capital or STEM capital? Exploring relationships between science capital and technology, engineering, and math aspirations and attitudes among young people aged 17/18. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 57, n. 8, p. 1228-1249, 2020. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.21628. Acesso em: 10 maio 2021.

MUJTABA, T. et al. Students’ science attitudes, beliefs, and context: Associations with science and chemistry aspirations. International Journal of Science Education, v. 40, n. 6, p. 644-667, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2018.1433896. Acesso em: 20 set. 2021.

NOMIKOU, E.; ARCHER, L.; KING, H. Building 'science capital' in the classroom. School Science Review, v. 98, n. 365, p. 118-124, 2017. Disponível em: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/building-science-capital-in-the-classroom(fcbc7553-143f-489f-b252-24de35772759).html. Acesso em: 09 jul. 2022.

PADWICK, A. et al. Innovative methods for evaluating the science capital of young people. IEEE Frontiers in Education, dec. 2016. Disponível em: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7757680. Acesso em: 03 set. 2021.

QUINLAN, C. L. Expanding the Science capital in K–12 Science Textbooks: A Notable Doctor's Insights into Biology & Other Accomplishments of African American Scientists. The American Biology Teacher, v. 82, n. 6, p. 381-388, 2020. Disponível em: https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-abstract/82/6/381/111545/Expanding-the-Science-Capital-in-K-12-Science. Acesso em: 03 jan. 2021.

RÜSCHENPÖHLER, L.; MARKIC, S. Secondary school students’ acquisition of science capital in the field of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, v. 21, p. 220-236, 2020. Disponível em: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2019/rp/c9rp00127a. Acesso em: 05 maio 2021.

SALEHJEE, S.; WATTS, M. Science lives: School choices and natural tendencies. International journal of science education, v. 37, n. 4, p. 727-743, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2015.1013075. Acesso em: 09 ago. 2021.

STAHL, G. et al. Middle years students’ engagement with science in rural and urban communities in Australia: exploring science capital, place-based knowledges and familial relationships. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, p. 1-18, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14681366.2019.1684351. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2021.

TANNOCK, S. The oil industry in our schools: from Petro Pete to science capital in the age of climate crisis. Environmental Education Research, v. 26, n. 4, p. 474-490, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504622.2020.172489. Acesso em: 05 jan. 2021.

TEO, T. W. et al. Rethinking teaching and learning of science inference competencies of lower track students in Singapore: A Rasch investigation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, v. 38, n. 3, p. 279-302, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02188791.2018.1476320. Acesso em: 05 fev. 2021.

THOMPSON, J. J.; JENSEN-RYAN, D. Becoming a “Science Person”: Faculty Recognition and the Development of Cultural Capital in the Context of Undergraduate Biology Research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, v. 17, n. 4, p. 1-17, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.lifescied.org/doi/full/10.1187/cbe.17-11-0229. Acesso em: 29 maio 2021.

TURNBULL, S. M. et al. The Impact of Science capital on Self-Concept in Science: A Study of University Students in New Zealand. Frontiers in Education, v. 5, p. 1-16, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.00027/full. Acesso em: 15 set. 2021.

WILSON‐LOPEZ, A. et al. Forms of science capital mobilized in adolescents’ engineering projects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 55, n. 2, p. 246-270, 2018. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.21418. Acesso em: 16 jul. 2021.

WONG, B. Five ‘Types’ of Science Participation. In: WONG, B. Science Education, Career Aspirations and Minority Ethnic Students. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016a.

WONG, B. Minority ethnic students and science participation: A qualitative mapping of achievement, aspiration, interest and capital. Research in Science Education, v. 46, n. 1, p. 113-127, 2016b. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-015-9466-x. Acesso em: 13 jan. 2021.

WONG, B. Science capital. In: WONG, B. Science Education, Career Aspirations and Minority Ethnic Students. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016c.

Publicado

01/07/2022

Como Citar

FERRARO, J. L.; HECK, G. S. Capital da ciência: Uma revisão sistemática de pesquisas entre 2015-2021. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, Araraquara, v. 17, n. 3, p. 1389–1416, 2022. DOI: 10.21723/riaee.v17i3.15633. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/iberoamericana/article/view/15633. Acesso em: 4 dez. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Artigos