Individual innovativeness and leadership self-efficacy among the teacher candidates: The mediating role of self-regulation approach

Çiğdem Çakir; Tuba Aydin Güngör

doi:10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17725

Autores

Çiğdem Çakir Kadriye Abdülmecit Özgözen Secondary School, Gaziantep – Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-5214
Tuba Aydin Güngör Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin – Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3356-7826

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17725

Palavras-chave:

Candidatos a professores, Abordagem de autorregulação, Autoeficácia da liderança

Resumo

Um número limitado de estudos avaliou a relação entre inovação individual e autoeficácia de liderança entre os candidatos a professores. Esta pesquisa investigou os efeitos mediadores da Abordagem de Autorregulação, para determinar as relações diretas e indiretas entre a inovação individual de candidatos a professores e a autoeficácia de liderança. Participantes (entre 17 e 24 anos - N=350) de uma universidade participaram deste estudo, 68,9% (241) dos participantes eram do sexo feminino, 31,1% (109) eram do sexo masculino. Foi utilizado o modelo de pesquisa correlacional. O instrumento do estudo foi composto por quatro seções: (i) Formulário de Informações Pessoais contendo variáveis demográficas, (ii) Escala de Inovação Individual (IIS), (iii) Escala de Autoeficácia de Liderança (LSES) e (iv) Escala de Abordagem de Autoavaliação (SAA). Os resultados mostram que a análise de regressão foi usada para testar as hipóteses, e a escala de autoeficácia de liderança foi definida como dependente, inovação individual como independente, abordagem de autoavaliação como mediadora e gênero e série como variáveis de controle.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Çiğdem Çakir, Kadriye Abdülmecit Özgözen Secondary School, Gaziantep – Turkey

PhD, State School Teacher.

Tuba Aydin Güngör, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin – Turkey

Assistant Professor, Education Faculty.

Referências

ADIGÜZEL, H. The effect of internal corporate governance structure to the earnings management practice in Turkey. 2012. Dissertation (Doctoral) – Marmara Universitesi, Turkey, 2012.

ALTIN, Z. Covid-19 pandemisinde yaşlılar. Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Dergisi, v. 30, n. 2, p. 49-57, 2020.

ARLI, Ö.; AVCI, A. Öz kendilik değerlendirmesinin öz liderlik davranışları üzerinde etkisi: İlköğretim öğretmenleri üzerine bir araştırma. Mehmet Akif Ersoy üniversitesi sosyal bilimler enstitüsü dergisi, v. 9, n. 22, p. 455-468, 2017.

ASLANOĞLU, H. N. Muhafazakâr Genç Kuşağın Instagram Profilleri: Mahremiyet, Moda ve Ahlakilik İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. İstanbul: İlemblog, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2016.

BANDURA, A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, v. 50, n. 2, p. 248-287, 1991.

BANDURA, A.; ADAMS, N. E. Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive therapy and research, v. 1, n. 4, p. 287-310, 1977.

BEMBENUTTY, H. Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Self-Regulation of Learning, and Academic Performance. 2006.

BEMBENUTTY, H. Academic delay of gratification, self-regulation of learning, gender differences, and expectancy-value. Personality and Individual Differences, v. 46, n. 3, p. 347-352, 2009.

BOBBIO, A.; MANGANELLII, A. M. Leadership self-efficacy scale: A new multidimensional instrument. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, v. 16, n. 1, p. 3-24, 2009.

BUBOU, G. M.; JOB, G. C. Individual innovativeness, self-efficacy and e-learning readiness of students of Yenagoa study centre, National Open University of Nigeria. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, v. 15, n. 1, p. 2-22, 2020.

CANNONIER, N.; KATSIOLOUDES, V. Leadershıp Self-Effıcacy: Development Of A Measure For College Students. International Journal of Business & Public Administration, v. 17, n. 1, 2020.

CANSOY, R.; POLATCAN, M. Liderlik Öz-Yeterliği Ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Adapting Leadership Self-Efficacy Scale into Turkish culture: Validity and reliability study]. Pesa International Journal of Social Studies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 331-342, 2018. DOI: 10.25272/j.2149-8385.2018.4.4.01.

ÇELIK, S. Unspoken social dynamics in an online discussion group: the disconnect between attitudes and overt behavior of English language teaching graduate students. Educational Technology Research and Development, v. 61, n. 4, p. 665-683, 2013.

CHEMERS, M. M.; WATSON, C. B.; MAY, S. T. Dispositional affect and leadership effectiveness: A comparison of self-esteem, optimism, and efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, v. 26, n. 3, p. 267-277, 2000.

ÇOLAKOĞLU, Ö. M.; MAHIROĞLU, A. Öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenleme yaklaşımlarını ölçen hareket ve değerlendirme yaklaşımları ölçekleri¬nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanma çalışması [The adaptation study of the locomotion and assessment scales measuring self-regulation approaches of prospective teachers]. Kastamonu Education Journal, v. 27, n. 1, p. 15-23, 2019. DOI:10.24106/kefdergi.2154.

ÇOLAKOĞLU, Ö. M.; MAHIROĞLU, A. Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz-düzenleme Yaklaşımlarını Ölçen Hareket ve Değerlendirme Yaklaşımları Ölçeklerinin Türkçe’ye, Uyarlanma Çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, v. 27, n. 1, p. 15-23, 2019.

DAWSON, J. F. Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. J. Bus. Psych, v. 29, p. 1-19, 2020.

DEMBO, M. H. Learning to teach is not enough: Future teachers also need to learn how to learn. Teacher Education Quarterly, v. 28, n. 4, p. 23-35, 2001.

EEKELEN, I. M.; BOSHUIZEN, H. P. A.; VERMUNT, J. D. Self-regulation in higher education teacher learning. Higher Education, v. 50, p. 447–471, 2005.

ERTUĞ, N.; KAYA, H. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bireysel yenilikçilik profilleri ve yenilikçiliğin önündeki engellerin incelenmesi. 2017.

GÖKÇEARSLAN, Ş.; KARADEMIR, T.; KORUCU, A. T. Preservice teachers’ level of web pedagogical content knowledge: Assessment by individual innovativeness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, v. 55, n. 1, p. 70-94, 2017.

HAYES, A. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press, NY, USA. 2018.

HILL, M. F.; ELL, F. R.; EYERS, G. Assessment capability and student self-regulation: The challenge of preparing teachers. Frontiers in Education, v. 2, p. 21, 2017.

HURT, H. T.; JOSEPH, K.; COOK, C. D. Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, v. 4, p. 58-65, 1977.

KARASAR, N. Bilimsel araştırma metodu [Scientific research method]. Ankara: Hacettepe: Taş Kitapçılık. 2014.

KILIÇER, K.; ODABAŞI, H. F. Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği (BYÖ): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Individual Innovativeness Scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability]. H. U. Journal of Education, v. 38, p. 150–164, 2010.

KOÇYIĞIT, M.; ERDEM, C.; EĞMIR, E. Öğretmenlerin ve öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterliklerine ilişkin öz değerlendirmeleri. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, v. 9, n. 3, p. 774-799, 2020.

KÖSTERELIOĞLU, İ.; ÇELEN, Ü. Öz Değerlendirme Yönteminin Etkililiğinin Değerlendirilmesi. Ilkogretim Online, v. 15, n. 2, p. 56-80, 2016.

KRUGLANSKI, A. W. et al. To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 79, n. 5, p. 793-815, 2000.

KUHL, J. Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Action control, p. 101-128, 1985.

LUECKE, R. A.; PATTERSON, J. G. How to become a better negotiator. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, 2008.

MACHIDA, M.; SCHAUBROECK, J. The role of self-efficacy beliefs in leader development. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, v. 18, n. 4, p. 459-468, 2011.

MCCORMICK, M. J. Self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness: Applying social cognitive theory to leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, v. 8, n. 1, p. 22-33, 2001.

MCCORMICK, M. J.; TANGUMA, J.; LÓPEZ-FORMENT, A. S. Extending self-efficacy theory to leadership: A review and empirical test. Journal of Leadership Education, v. 1, n. 2, p. 34-49, 2002.

NGUYEN, Q. T. Multinationality and performance literature: A critical review and future research agenda. Management International Review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 311-347, 2017.

PAGLIS, L. L. Leadership self-efficacy: research findings and practical applications. Journal of Management Development, 2015.

PARIS, S. G.; BYRNES, J. P. The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. Springer, New York, NY. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, p. 169-200, 1989.

PREACHER, K. J.; HAYES, A. F. Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In: HAYES, A. F.; SLATER, M. D.; SNYDER, L. B. (Eds.). The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Sage Publications, Inc., 2008. p. 13-54. DOI: 10.4135/9781452272054.n2.

RANDI, J. Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record, v. 106, n. 9, p. 1825-1853, 2004.

RANDI, J.; CORNO, L.; JOHNSON, E. Transitioning from college classroom to teaching career: Self-regulation in prospective teachers. New directions for Teaching and Learning, v. 126, p. 89-98, 2011.

WARNER, R. M. Applied Statistics: From Bivariate through Multivariate Techniques. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2013.

YAMAÇ, K. Nedir bu inovasyon. Üniversite ve Toplum, v. 1, n. 3, p. 6-7, 2001.

YURDABAKAN, I. The Investigation of the Prospective Teachers' Opinions Related to Peer Assessment: A Qualitative Study. Online Submission, v. 7, n. 4, p. 1-12, 2016.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: an analysis of exemplary instructional models. 1998.