Online learning issues in Russian universities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.14988

Keywords:

Online learning, Online education, Involvement, Feedback, Self-directed education, Assessment, Teacher’s core competencies, Student

Abstract

There is considerable uncertainty as to the way we lead our lives. We face global changes concerning every single aspect of our lives: economy, digital technologies, cultures, languages, and even our health and today not mentioning all the catastrophic consequences of the pandemic and economic slowdown. Institutions are responding to the current circumstances with a shift to online learning. While most universities have urgently switched to online learning and benefit from using educational and videoconferencing platforms, the issues caused by online education under these circumstances are still to be studied and carefully analysed. This article problematizes the influence of online learning and reveals a range of pitfalls arising in the process of online education as well as a detailed analysis of these issues. It was found out that the online learning process is affected by a wider range of reasons than we expected. The interrogative method was used as the main measurement tool. The evaluation studies were carried out at the university on its use of an online education system as a forced response to the current worldwide pandemic. Among revealed issues, we established the following: students’ ability to learn self-directly, assessment tools used by teachers to evaluate the knowledge, timely teacher’s feedback, teachers’ core competencies and personal qualities, technical, health issues, and some others. The global events caused a situation when universities had to reconsider the way they deliver education to people. The goal is to make it more expedient, accessible, and personalized. The information in the paper can contribute to the quality improvement of online education and learning success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gulnara Minshakirovna Ilduganova, Kazan Federal University (KPFU), Kazan

Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages and Professional Communication, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance.

Nataliya Vladimirovna Tikhonova, Kazan Federal University (KPFU), Kazan

Head Professor of the Department of European Languages and Cultures, Institute of International Relations.

Ruzilia Irekovna Galimullina, Kazan Federal University (KPFU), Kazan

Head Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages and Professional Communication, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance.

References

BROADBENT, J.; POON, W. L. Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, v. 27, p. 1-13, 2015.

ĆUKUŠIĆ, M.; GARAČA, Ž.; JADRIĆ, M. Online self-assessment and students' success in higher education institutions. Computers & Education, v. 72, p. 100-109, 2014.

GIKANDI, J. W.; Morrow, D.; Davis, N. E. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & education, v. 57, n. 4, p. 2333-2351, 2011.

GLUKHOV, A. P. Features of culture of virtual communications of generation z: management of communication regimes. Znak: Problemnoye pole mediaobrazovaniya, v. 4, n. 30, p. 157-166, 2018.

HEW, K. F.; Cheung, W. S. Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational research review, v. 12, p. 45-58, 2014.

KUO, Y. C. et al. Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The internet and higher education, v. 20, p. 35-50, 2014.

LEE, K. Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. The Internet and Higher Education, v. 33, p.15-23, 2017.

MAKAROVA, L. N.; SARTSEV, M. V. Problem zones of teachers and students’ interaction. Social-economic phenomena and processes, v. 12, n. 5, p. 210-216, 2017.

NICOL, D. J.; MACFARLANE‐DICK, D. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, v. 31, n. 2, p. 199-218, 2006.

RAZDORSKAYA, I. M. et al. Ethic aspects of the teachers and students interaction in the process of education. Karelian Scientific Journal, v. 7, n. 1(22), p. 53-56, 2018.

SHIN, T. S.; RANELLUCCI, J.; ROSETH, C. J. Effects of peer and instructor rationales on online students’ motivation and achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, v. 82, p. 184-199, 2017.

TIKHONOVA, N. V.; ILDUGANOVA, G. M.; LUKINA, M. S. Implemented teaching methods based on interactive learning process in order to increase the ability of learning foreign language. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, p. 473-478, 2018.

TIKHONOVA, N. V.; ILDUGANOVA, G. M.; LUKINA, M. S. Research projects as an effective practice of teaching ecological thinking through second language. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, v. 7, p. 809-815, 2017.

WANG, J. et al. Meaningful engagement in Facebook learning environments: merging social and academic lives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, v. 14, n. 1, p. 302-322, 2013.

WASCHULL, S. B. The online delivery of psychology courses: attrition, performance, and evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, v. 28, n. 2, p. 143-147, 2001.

Published

01/03/2021

How to Cite

Ilduganova, G. M., Tikhonova, N. V., & Galimullina, R. I. (2021). Online learning issues in Russian universities. Revista on Line De Política E Gestão Educacional, 25(esp.1), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.14988