Educational and legal status of the actors of the experimental legal regimes (regulatory sandboxes) in Russia

Marina L. Davydova; Vladislav O. Makarov

doi:10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17408

Authors

Marina L. Davydova Volgograd State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-9592
Vladislav O. Makarov Volgograd State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3818-6328

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17408

Keywords:

Experimental legal regime, Regulatory sandbox, Educational status, Digital economy, Educational description

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to study the educational and legal status of actors of Russian experimental legal regimes (regulatory sandboxes). This research analyzes categories of actors of experimental legal regimes (regulatory sandboxes), as provisioned by current Russian legislation. It distinguishes two main groups of actors according to their role in experimental legal regimes. The research methodology is based on formal logic, educational, systemic, and structural analysis and interpretation of legal regulations. The study’s results provide an educational description of subjects involved in establishing a regulatory sandbox, as provisioned by the national legislation, and make a distinction between participating and regulating actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DAVYDOVA, M. L. Formation and normalization of legal terminology in the field of digital technologies. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 4, p. 52-63, 2020. DOI:10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.4.5

DMITRIK, N. A. Experimental legal regimes: theoretical and legal aspect. Law, [S. l.], v. 6, p.64-74, 2020.

EFREMOV, A. A.; DOBROLYUBOVA, E. I.; TALAPINA, E. V.; YUZHAKOV, V. N. Experimental legal regimes: global practices and Russian initiatives. Moscow, Russia: Delo. 2020.

MAKAROV, V.O. Practical aspects of implementing regulatory sandboxes in Russian legislation in the context of adopting Federal Law No. 258-FZ of July 31, 2020, “On experimental legal regimes in the field of digital innovations in the Russian Federation”. Legal Studies, [S. l.], v. 11, p. 18-25, 2020. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2020.11.34587.

MAKAROV, V. O.; DAVYDOVA, M. L. On the Concept of Regulatory Sandboxes. "Smart Technologies" for Society, State and Economy. ISC 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, [S. l.], v. 155, p. 1014-1020, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59126-7_112.

OMAROVA, S. T. Technology v Technocracy: Fintech as a Regulatory Challenge. Journal of Financial Regulation, [S. l.], v. 6, p. 75-124, 2020. DOI: 10.1093/jfr/fjaa004.

RINGE, W. G.; RUOF, C. Regulating Fintech in the EU: the Case for a Guided Sandbox. European Journal of Risk Regulation, [S. l.], v. 11, p. 604-629, 2020. DOI:10.1017/err.2020.8.

TRUBY, J. Fintech and the city: Sandbox 2.0 policy and regulatory reform proposals. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, [S. l.], v. 34, n. 3, p. 277-309, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/13600869.2018.1546542.

WECHSLER, M.; PERLMAN, L.; GURUNG, N. The State of Regulatory Sandboxes in Developing Countries. 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3285938. Disponível em: https://dfsobservatory.com/sites/default/files/DFSO%20-%20The%20State%20of%20Regulatory%20Sandboxes%20in%20Developing%20Countries%20-%20PUBLIC.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2021.

ZETZSCHE D.; BUCKLEY R.; ARNER D.; BARBERIS J. N. Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation. EBI Working Paper Series, [S. l.], v. 11, 2017. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3018534. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3018534. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2021.