Testes on-line e tecnologia na avaliação de línguas

Nurgül Bekdemir; İsmail Fırat Altay

doi:10.22633/rpge.v29iesp1.20474

Autores/as

Nurgül Bekdemir Universidade de Ordu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-2653
İsmail Fırat Altay Universidade de Hacettepe https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-1818

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp1.20474

Palabras clave:

Evaluación en línea, Evaluación basada en computadora, Evaluación adaptativa por computadora, Evaluación alternativa en línea, Inteligencia artificial

Resumen

La tecnología es una parte indispensable del proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje de idiomas, incluida la evaluación. Este estudio analiza herramientas y plataformas tecnológicas en la evaluación y pruebas lingüísticas en línea desde diversas perspectivas. Explora tanto las evaluaciones formativas como sumativas en pruebas aplicadas en el aula y a gran escala, así como herramientas en línea que facilitan la evaluación alternativa. Se ilustran modelos como la Evaluación Basada en Computadora (CBA) y las Pruebas Adaptativas por Computadora (CAT). También se examina la inteligencia artificial, que tiene un efecto revolucionario en la evaluación lingüística, junto con las plataformas actuales. Asimismo, se abordan cuestiones críticas como la fiabilidad, validez y críticas sobre la autenticidad, interactividad, impacto y practicidad de la evaluación en línea, presentando ventajas y desventajas. El estudio busca demostrar cómo la tecnología transforma la evaluación lingüística y ofrecer perspectivas relevantes para diseñadores de pruebas, docentes y responsables de políticas educativas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Nurgül Bekdemir, Universidade de Ordu

Universidade de Ordu, Ordu, Turquia. Docente do Departamento de Línguas Estrangeiras, Escola de Línguas Estrangeiras

İsmail Fırat Altay, Universidade de Hacettepe

Universidade de Hacettepe, Ancara, Turquia. Professora Associada do Departamento de Ensino de Língua Inglesa, Faculdade de Educação.

Citas

Altay, İ. F., & Altay, A. (2017). The impact of on-line reading tasks and reading strategies on EFL learners’ reading test scores. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 136-152.

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (Vol. 4). Longman.

Burstein, J., Frase, L. T., Ginther, A., & Grant, L. (1996). Technologies for language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001537

Chapelle, C. A., & Douglas, D. (2006). Assessing language through computer technology. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Chapelle, C. A., & Voss, E. (2008). Utilizing technology in language assessment. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2(7), 123–134.

Cook, J., & Jenkins, V. (2010). Getting started with e-assessment. University of Bath. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/17712/

Council of Europe. (s.d.). European Language Portfolio (ELP). Retrieved March 10, 2020, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/portfolio

Dunn, L., Morgan, C., O’Reilly, M., & Parry, S. (2005). The student assessment handbook: New directions in traditional and on-line assessment. Routledge.

Educational Testing Service. (s.d.-a). The TOEIC® program. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/toeic/

Educational Testing Service. (s.d.-b). Content and format of the TOEIC® Listening and Reading Test. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/toeic/test-takers/listening-reading/about/content-format/

Educational Testing Service. (s.d.-c). Content and format of the TOEIC® Speaking and Writing Tests. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/toeic/test-takers/speaking-writing/about/content-format/

Educational Testing Service. (s.d.-d). How ETS scores the TOEFL iBT® test. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/s/toefl/flash/33910_toefl-scoring-video_transcript.html

Educational Testing Service. (s.d.-e). About the TOEFL iBT® test. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/toefl/test-takers/ibt/about

Evanini, K., Heilman, M., Wang, X., & Blanchard, D. (2015). Automated scoring for the TOEFL Junior® comprehensive writing and speaking test. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(1), 1–11. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1109726.pdf

Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment. Routledge.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Hodgson, P., & Pang, M. Y. C. (2012). Effective formative e-assessment of student learning: A study on a statistics course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.523818

International English Language Testing System (IELTS). (s.d.-a). Computer-delivered IELTS. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.ielts.org/about-the-test/computer-delivered-ielts

International English Language Testing System (IELTS). (s.d.-b). Test format. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.ielts.org/about-the-test/test-format

Jamieson, J. (2005). Trends in computer-based second language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000127

Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J. (2012). Comparison between dichotomous and polytomous scoring of innovative items in a large-scale computerized adaptive test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(3), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411422903

Jordan, S. E. (2013). E-assessment: Past, present and future. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2013(140), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i9.504

Karani, A. O., & Mwancha, C. N. (2025). The role of ChatGPT in STEM education: Assessing its prospects, challenges, ethical implications, and influence on student creativity and innovation competencies. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 5(2), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15489162

Lin, J. W., & Lai, Y. C. (2019). User acceptance model of computer-based assessment: Moderating effect and intention-behavior effect. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4684

Navrat, P., & Tvarozek, J. (2014). On-line programming exercises for summative assessment in university courses. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 341–348).

Ogrenci Secme ve Yerlestirme Merkezi. (2019). 2019 Yabancı Dil Bilgisi Seviye Tespit Sınavı (YDS) kılavuzu. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2019/YDS-1/kilavuz30012019.pdf

Oxford University Press. (s.d.-a). Oxford Test of English. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://elt.oup.com/feature/global/oxford_test_of_english/?cc=tr&selLanguage=en

Oxford University Press. (s.d.-b). Who recognizes the Oxford Test of English? Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://elt.oup.com/feature/global/oxford_test_of_english/recognition?cc=tr&selLanguage=en

Pearson. (s.d.-a). PTE Academic. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://pearsonpte.com/the-test/

Pearson. (s.d.-b). Test format. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://pearsonpte.com/the-test/format/

Pearson. (s.d.-c). How is the test scored? Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://pearsonpte.com/the-test/about-our-scores/how-is-the-test-scored/

Stannard, R., & Skip Basiel, A. (2013). A practice-based exploration of technology-enhanced assessment for English language teaching. In Motteram, G. (Ed.), Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching (pp. 145–174). British Council.

Simkin, M. G., & Kuechler, W. L. (2005). Multiple choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00053.x

Suvorov, R., & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Computer‐assisted language testing. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 594–613). Wiley-Blackwell.

Taras, M. (2005). Assessment–summative and formative–some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x

Turnitin Feedback Studio. (s.d.-a). What can you do with Feedback Studio? Retrieved March 10, 2020, from https://www.turnitin.com/products/feedback-studio

Turnitin Feedback Studio. (s.d.-b). How to use PeerMark. Retrieved March 10, 2020, from https://www.turnitin.com/videos/how-to-use-peermark

Williamson, H. (2018). On-line exams: The need for best practices and overcoming challenges. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.62915/2154-8935.1128

Xi, X. (2021). Validity and the automated scoring of performance tests. In Fulcher, G. & Harding, L. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of language testing (2nd ed., pp. 513–529). Routledge.

Xu, J., Galaczi, E., Schmidt, E., & Somers, A. (2025). Automarking in language assessment: Key considerations for best practice. Language Assessment Quarterly.