Aplicación de la estrategia de andamiaje en la enseñanza de la resolución de problemas para fortalecer la motivación de los estudiantes hacia el aprendizaje en la ciudad de Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp3.20687Palabras clave:
Scaffolding strategy, Distance from a point to a plane, Spatial geometry, Learning motivation, High educationResumen
El estudio aborda el desafío que enfrentan los estudiantes en la comprensión de la distancia espacial, particularmente en la determinación de la distancia de un punto a un plano, un concepto abstracto que con frecuencia provoca desorientación y pérdida de motivación. Para abordar esta dificultad, la investigación aplica una estrategia de andamiaje basada en la Zona de Desarrollo Próximo de Vygotsky con el fin de diseñar un proceso instruccional que apoye la comprensión conceptual. Se implementó un método cuasiexperimental con dos grupos de estudiantes de 11.º grado. Los datos se recopilaron mediante calificaciones de pruebas y encuestas de motivación, y luego se analizaron utilizando estadísticas descriptivas y pruebas de muestras emparejadas en SPSS 26. Los resultados revelaron que los estudiantes del grupo experimental obtuvieron un rendimiento superior y demostraron una motivación de aprendizaje significativamente mayor. Estos hallazgos confirman que el andamiaje mejora de manera efectiva la capacidad de los estudiantes para resolver problemas de distancia espacial, fortalece su confianza en el proceso de aprendizaje y aumenta su motivación para el estudio de la matemática.
Descargas
Citas
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9
Benden, D. K., & Lauermann, F. (2023). Relative importance of students’ expectancy–value beliefs as predictors of academic success in gateway math courses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1521(1), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14961
Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M., & Sheldon, B. (1997). The impact of teaching strategies on intrinsic motivation. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED418925.pdf
Darboe, K. (2000). An empirical study of the social correlates of job satisfaction among plant science graduates of a Midwestern university: A test of Victor H. Vroom’s (1964) expectancy theory. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company.
Duong, H. T., Ha, H. Q. T., Bui, P. U., & Nguyen, Q. K. (2018). Solving a mathematical problem in different ways: A case of calculating the distance from a point to a plane. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 54(8), 54. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2018.038
Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). Freeman.
Eccles, J. S. (2006). A motivational perspective on school achievement. In R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Optimizing student success in schools with the other three Rs: Reasoning, Resilience, and Responsibility (pp. 199–224). Information Age Publishing.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2024). The development, testing, and refinement of Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues’ situated expectancy-value model of achievement performance and choice. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09888-9
Fielding-Wells, J., O’Brien, M., & Makar, K. (2017). Using expectancy-value theory to explore aspects of motivation and engagement in inquiry-based learning in primary mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0201-y
Hart, P. (2023). Perceived happiness and general health: An IRT investigation. Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.12691/rpbs-11-2-3
Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818
Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
Lee, Y., & Song, H. (2022). Motivation for MOOC learning persistence: An expectancy–value theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958945
Manaf, L. I., Wutsqa, D. U., & Radite, R. (2024). Effectiveness of scaffolding technique in scientific learning model on students' mathematics critical thinking skills and self-regulated learning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5862
Mayerhofer, M., Lüftenegger, M., & Eichmair, M. (2024). The development of mathematics expectancy–value profiles during the secondary–tertiary transition into STEM fields. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00491-6
McLeod, S. (2025). Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). General Education Program: Comprehensive Program (Circular No. 32/2018/TT-BGDDT).
Nagle, C. (2021). Using expectancy–value theory to understand motivation, persistence, and achievement in university-level foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 54(4), 1238–1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12569
Nam, P. S., Thai, L. H., Lavicza, Z., Schmid, A., & Houghton, T. (2024). Augmented reality as a tool to support the connection between reality and mathematical knowledge. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v31.3.04
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Phuc, N. M., & Tam, H. T. (2024). Enhancing measurement and calculation education in high school through 3D printing technology. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v31.3.05
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1
Sari, I. N., Mahanal, S., & Setiawan, D. (2024). Implementation of a problem-based learning model assisted with scaffolding. BIO-INOVED: Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v6i1.17890
Sari, S. R., Wibowo, T., & Kurniasih, N. (2024). Use of scaffolding techniques in mathematical problem solving. AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 3(1), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1755
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
Tran, L. T., & Nguyen, T. S. (2021). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A Vietnamese case study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.3.14274.449-468
Tran, N. D., Tran, D. H., Nguyen, T. A., Nguyen, C., Ngo, H. L., Pham, H. Q., & Pham, T. T. (2023). Math 11. Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Trimurtini, T., Waluya, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Kharisudin, I., & Nugraheni, N. (2023). Scaffolding guidelines in geometry learning. Progress in Language, Literature and Education Research, 3, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/pller/v3/8261a
Vo, X. M., & Le, N. N. H. (2023). On the problem of calculating the distance from a point to a plane. Dong Thap University Journal of Science, 28, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.28.10.2017.519
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Waruwu, B., & Zega, C. S. (2023). The effectiveness of scaffolding model on students’ conceptual understanding. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 6(3), 245–250. https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jrpp/article/view/18866
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. É vedada a submissão integral ou parcial do manuscrito a qualquer outro periódico. A responsabilidade do conteúdo dos artigos é exclusiva dos autores. É vedada a tradução para outro idioma sem a autorização escrita do Editor ouvida a Comissão Editorial Científica.


