Applyıng scaffoldıng strategy ın teachıng problem solvıng to enhance students’ learnıng motıvatıon ın Ho Chı Mınh cıty, Vıetnam

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp3.20687

Keywords:

Estrategia de andamiaje, Distancia de un punto a un plano, Geometría espacial, Motivación para el aprendizaje, Educación superior

Abstract

The study addresses the challenge students face in understanding spatial distance, particularly in determining the distance from a point to a plane, an abstract concept that often leads to disorientation and loss of motivation. To counter this, the research applies a scaffolding strategy based on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development to design an instructional process that supports conceptual understanding. A quasi-experimental method was implemented with two groups of 11th-grade students. Data were gathered through test scores and motivation surveys, then analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired-sample tests in SPSS 26. Results revealed that students in the experimental group achieved higher performance and demonstrated significantly greater learning motivation. These findings confirm that scaffolding effectively enhances students’ ability to solve spatial distance problems, fosters confidence in their learning process, and strengthens motivation for mathematical study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Thi Ngoc Tram Tran, Ly Tu Trong College

Faculty of Basic Sciences, Ly Tu Trong College, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Huu Hau Nguyen, Hong Duc University

Faculty of Natural Sciences, Hong Duc University, Thanh Hoa, Vietnam.

Hoa Anh Tuong, Sai Gon University

Faculty of Mathematics and Applied, Sai Gon university, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam.

Tran Trung Tinh, National Academy of Education Management

National Academy of Education Management, Hanoi city, Vietnam.

Trinh Cong Son, Nghe An University

Faculty of Primary Education, Nghe An University, Vietnam.

References

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261

Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9

Benden, D. K., & Lauermann, F. (2023). Relative importance of students’ expectancy–value beliefs as predictors of academic success in gateway math courses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1521(1), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14961

Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M., & Sheldon, B. (1997). The impact of teaching strategies on intrinsic motivation. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED418925.pdf

Darboe, K. (2000). An empirical study of the social correlates of job satisfaction among plant science graduates of a Midwestern university: A test of Victor H. Vroom’s (1964) expectancy theory. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company.

Duong, H. T., Ha, H. Q. T., Bui, P. U., & Nguyen, Q. K. (2018). Solving a mathematical problem in different ways: A case of calculating the distance from a point to a plane. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 54(8), 54. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2018.038

Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). Freeman.

Eccles, J. S. (2006). A motivational perspective on school achievement. In R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Optimizing student success in schools with the other three Rs: Reasoning, Resilience, and Responsibility (pp. 199–224). Information Age Publishing.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2024). The development, testing, and refinement of Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues’ situated expectancy-value model of achievement performance and choice. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09888-9

Fielding-Wells, J., O’Brien, M., & Makar, K. (2017). Using expectancy-value theory to explore aspects of motivation and engagement in inquiry-based learning in primary mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0201-y

Hart, P. (2023). Perceived happiness and general health: An IRT investigation. Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.12691/rpbs-11-2-3

Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818

Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067

Lee, Y., & Song, H. (2022). Motivation for MOOC learning persistence: An expectancy–value theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958945

Manaf, L. I., Wutsqa, D. U., & Radite, R. (2024). Effectiveness of scaffolding technique in scientific learning model on students' mathematics critical thinking skills and self-regulated learning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5862

Mayerhofer, M., Lüftenegger, M., & Eichmair, M. (2024). The development of mathematics expectancy–value profiles during the secondary–tertiary transition into STEM fields. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00491-6

McLeod, S. (2025). Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html

Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). General Education Program: Comprehensive Program (Circular No. 32/2018/TT-BGDDT).

Nagle, C. (2021). Using expectancy–value theory to understand motivation, persistence, and achievement in university-level foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 54(4), 1238–1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12569

Nam, P. S., Thai, L. H., Lavicza, Z., Schmid, A., & Houghton, T. (2024). Augmented reality as a tool to support the connection between reality and mathematical knowledge. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v31.3.04

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Phuc, N. M., & Tam, H. T. (2024). Enhancing measurement and calculation education in high school through 3D printing technology. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v31.3.05

Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.

Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1

Sari, I. N., Mahanal, S., & Setiawan, D. (2024). Implementation of a problem-based learning model assisted with scaffolding. BIO-INOVED: Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v6i1.17890

Sari, S. R., Wibowo, T., & Kurniasih, N. (2024). Use of scaffolding techniques in mathematical problem solving. AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 3(1), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1755

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571

Tran, L. T., & Nguyen, T. S. (2021). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A Vietnamese case study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.3.14274.449-468

Tran, N. D., Tran, D. H., Nguyen, T. A., Nguyen, C., Ngo, H. L., Pham, H. Q., & Pham, T. T. (2023). Math 11. Vietnam Education Publishing House.

Trimurtini, T., Waluya, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Kharisudin, I., & Nugraheni, N. (2023). Scaffolding guidelines in geometry learning. Progress in Language, Literature and Education Research, 3, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/pller/v3/8261a

Vo, X. M., & Le, N. N. H. (2023). On the problem of calculating the distance from a point to a plane. Dong Thap University Journal of Science, 28, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.28.10.2017.519

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Waruwu, B., & Zega, C. S. (2023). The effectiveness of scaffolding model on students’ conceptual understanding. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 6(3), 245–250. https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jrpp/article/view/18866

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Published

27/11/2025

How to Cite

Tram Tran, T. N., Nguyen, H. H., Tuong, H. A., Trung Tinh, T., & Cong Son, T. (2025). Applyıng scaffoldıng strategy ın teachıng problem solvıng to enhance students’ learnıng motıvatıon ın Ho Chı Mınh cıty, Vıetnam. Revista on Line De Política E Gestão Educacional, 29(esp3), e025070. https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp3.20687