El impacto del liderazgo instruccional de los directores en la autoeficacia docente y en los resultados de aprendizaje afectivo de los estudiantes
un modelo mediado en instituciones chinas de educación superior profesionalizante
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp4.20764Palabras clave:
Liderazgo instruccional de los directores, Autoeficacia docente, Resultados de aprendizaje afectivo, Modelo mediador, Educación vocacionalResumen
Esta investigación analiza cómo el liderazgo instruccional de los directores (LID) influye en los resultados de aprendizaje afectivo de los estudiantes (RAA), con especial atención al efecto mediador de la autoeficacia docente (AED) en el contexto de las instituciones chinas de educación superior vocacional. Se desarrolló un modelo conceptual para examinar las relaciones entre el LID, la AED y los RAA. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante una encuesta estructurada completada por 406 docentes de tiempo completo de instituciones vocacionales públicas. Para el análisis de datos se empleó la modelización de ecuaciones estructurales (MEE). Los resultados indicaron que el LID tiene un impacto positivo significativo en la AED y que tanto el LID como la AED influyen de manera significativa en los RAA. Además, se constató que la AED media parcialmente la relación entre el LID y los RAA. El estudio aporta una contribución teórica al integrar referencias de liderazgo y motivación, y ofrece orientaciones prácticas para fortalecer el liderazgo instruccional, con o objetivo de incrementar la autoeficacia docente y el involucramiento emocional de los estudiantes en su proceso de aprendizaje.
Descargas
Citas
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Cheng, Y. (2023). Emotional support and classroom climate in Chinese vocational colleges: Policy expectations and practical gaps. Journal of Vocational Education Studies, 34(2), 45–62.
Choi, Y., & Yang, H. (2023). Instructional leadership and student engagement: The mediating role of teacher self-efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
House, R. J. (1996). Path–goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Koomen, H. M. Y., Verschueren, K., & Thijs, J. T. (2012). Teacher–child relationships from an attachment perspective. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672260
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528.
Li, X., & Wei, L. (2023). Distributed leadership and innovation capacity among university faculties in China. Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 18(2), 134–148.
Lin, H., & Mohammad, M. (2025). Collaborative leadership and teacher autonomy: Drivers of school improvement in Zhengzhou’s vocational high schools. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 38–47.
Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209–231.
Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., & Wang, H. (2022). The influence of principals’ instructional leadership on student engagement: The mediating effect of teacher self-efficacy in Chinese secondary schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913456
Ma, Y., Xu, S., & Li, J. (2023). Teacher self-efficacy and classroom climate: Exploring the chain mediation in leadership effectiveness. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09745-8
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Ministry of Education. (2019). Plan for the construction of high-level vocational schools and majors with Chinese characteristics. Ministry of Education.
Naz, F., & Rashid, S. (2021). Effective instructional leadership can enhance teachers’ motivation and improve students’ learning outcomes. SJESR, 20(1), 477–485.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Papadakis, S., Kanadlı, S., Kardas, A., Tülübaş, T., Karakose, T., & Polat, H. (2024). Investigating the relationship between leadership for learning and student achievement through the mediation of teacher performance: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) approach. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1320.
Pianta, R. C. (2001). Student–teacher relationship scale: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250–275.
Ramsden, P. (1994). Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Tan, C., & Liu, Y. (2021). Governance reform and leadership in Chinese vocational education: A policy review. Chinese Education and Society, 54(3), 159–175.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.
Xiong, W. (2021). Socio-emotional risks and teacher–student relations among vocational students in Western China. Chinese Journal of Educational Development, 42(1), 87–95.
Zhao, H., & Li, X. (2023). Professional development pathways under distributed leadership: Evidence from China’s local university initiatives. Chinese Journal of Educational Leadership, 9(3), 201–220.
Zhao, L., & Yuan, H. (2023). From administration to leadership: Reform trends in China’s higher vocational colleges. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1156630. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1156630
Zhu, C., & Jiang, L. (2015). Job satisfaction among Chinese university academics: A comparison of self-financed and state-financed universities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(1), 101–111.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. É vedada a submissão integral ou parcial do manuscrito a qualquer outro periódico. A responsabilidade do conteúdo dos artigos é exclusiva dos autores. É vedada a tradução para outro idioma sem a autorização escrita do Editor ouvida a Comissão Editorial Científica.


