Exame dos fatores que afetam a preferência de educação aberta e e-learning com o modelo de equações estruturais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17468Palavras-chave:
E-learning, Sistema de gerenciamento de aprendizado, Sistemas de informação, PreferênciaResumo
O objetivo deste estudo é investigar os fatores que afetam a preferência por sistemas de e-learning usados como ferramenta básica ou de apoio tanto na educação aberta quanto na educação formal. O conjunto de dados utilizado neste estudo foi obtido a partir de um questionário aplicado a estudantes universitários selecionados aleatoriamente que fizeram cursos com o sistema de e-learning. O questionário foi aplicado a 561 pessoas e estatísticas descritivas foram calculadas com base nos dados obtidos. Para modelar e analisar as relações dos fatores que afetam direta e indiretamente a preferência dos sistemas de e-learning, foi estabelecida a Modelagem de Equações Estruturais. Como resultado da análise, foram determinadas as variáveis que afetam direta ou indiretamente a preferibilidade dos sistemas de e-learning. Além do efeito positivo da infraestrutura do sistema de informação sobre outras variáveis do modelo, foi revelado o efeito de mediação do sistema de gestão da aprendizagem sobre a infraestrutura do sistema de informação e a preferência.
Downloads
Referências
ADIGÜZEL, Z.; SÖNMEZ ÇAKIR, F.; KÜÇÜKOĞLU, I. The Effects of Organizational Communication and Participative Leadership on Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction in Organisations, BMIJ, v. 8, n. 4, p. 829-856, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i4.1593.
AJZEN, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-211, 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91) 90020-T.
APARICIO, M.; BACAO, F.; OLIVEIRA, T. Cultural impacts on e-learning systems' success. The Internet and Higher Education, v. 31, p. 58-70, 2016.
BAROUDI, J. J., OLSON, M. H.; IVES, B. An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, v. 29, p. 232-238, 1986.
BUZZARD, C. et al. The use of digital technologies in the classroom: A teaching and learning perspective. Journal of Marketing Education, v. 33, n. 2, p. 131–139, 2011.
CHENEY, P. H.; DICKSON, W. Organizational characteristics and information systems: an exploratory investigation. Academy of Management Journal, v. 25, n. 1, p. 170-184, 1982.
CIDRAL, W. A.; OLIVEIRA T.; FELICE, M.; APARICIO, M. E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers and Education, v. 122, p. 273-290, 2018.
CLARK, L. A.; WATSON, D. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological assessment, v. 7, n. 3, p. 309, 1995.
CONRATH, D. W.; MIGNEN, O. P. What is being done to measure user satisfaction with EDP/MIS. Information and Management, v. 19, n. 1, p. 7-19, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(90)90010-F.
DAVIS, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), v. 13, 3, p. 319-339, 1989.
DELONE, W. H. Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), v. 12, n. 1, p. 51-61, 1988.
DELONE, W. H.; MCLEAN, E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, v. 3, n. 1, p. 60-95, 1992.
DELONE, W. H.; MCLEAN, E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 19, n. 4, p. 9-30, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914199107.
DIAMANTOPOULOS, A.; SIGUAW, J. A. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 4, p. 263-282, 2006.
DIJKSTRA, T. K.; HENSELER, J. Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), v. 39, n. 2, p. 297-316, 2015.
FALLAH, M. H.; HOW, W. J.; UBELL, R. Blind scores in a graduate test:Conventional compared with Web-based outcomes. ALN Magazine, v. 4, n. 2, 2000.
FORNELL, C.; LARCKER, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 18, n. 1, p. 39–50, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
FREEZE R. D.; ALSHARE K. A.; LANE P. L.; WEN H. J. IS Success Model in E-Learning Context Based on Students' Perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, v. 21, n. 2, 2010.
GOLD, A. H.; MALHOTRA, A.; SEGARS, A. H. Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 18, n. 1, p. 185–214, 2001.
GUIMARAES, T.; ARMSTRONG, C. P.; O'NEAL, Q. Empirically testing some important factors for expert systems quality. Quality Management Journal, v. 13, n. 3, p. 28-38, 2006.
GUIMARAES, T.; STAPLES, S.; MCKEEN, J. Important human factors for systems development success: A user focus. In: SHAYO, C. (Ed.). Strategies for Managing IS Personnel. Idea Group Publishing, 2003.
HAIR, F. et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2. ed. Sage Publications, 2017.
HAIR, J. F. et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 2-24, 2019.
HARA, N.; KLING, R. Students’ distress with a Web-based distance education course: an ethnographic study of participants’ experiences. Information, Communication and Society, v. 3, n. 4, p. 557–579, 2000.
HENSELER, J.; RINGLE, C. M.; SINKOVICS, R. R. The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. Advances in International Marketing. Bingley: Emerald, 2009.
HEO, J.; HAN, I. Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing environments: An empirical investigation. Information and Management, v. 40, n. 4, p. 243-256, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00007-1.
HILTZ, S. R.; TUROFF, M. What makes learning networks effective? Commun. ACM, 45(4), 56–59. 2002.
HOGAN, T. P.; BENJAMIN, A.; BREZINSKI, K. L. Reliability methods: A note on the frequency of use of various types. Educationaland Psychological Measurement, v. 60, p. 523-531, 2000.
HOLLENBECK, C. R.; MASON, C. H.; SONG, J. H. Enhancing student learning in marketing courses: An exploration of fundamental principles for websiteplatforms. Journal of Marketing Education, v. 33, n. 2, p. 171-182. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.006.
HOLMGREN, R. HAAKE, U.; SÖDERSTRÖM, T. Firefighter learning at a distance: a longitudinal study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 33, n. 5, p. 500–512, 2017.
IGBARIA, M.; ZINATELLI, N.; CAVAYE, A. L. M. Analysis of information technology success in small firms in New Zealand. International Journal of Information Management, v. 18, n. 2, 103e119, 1998.
IVES, B.; OLSON, M. H. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management Science, v. 30, n. 5, p. 586-603, 1984.
IVES, B.; OLSON, M.; BAROUDI, J. The Measurement of User Satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, v. 26, n. 10 785-793, 1983.
KIM, K. et al. The Impact of CMS Quality on the Outcomes of E-learning Systems in Higher Education: An Empirical Study. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, v. 10, n. 4, p. 575-587, 2012.
KLINE, R. B. Principles and practice of structural equation. The Guilford Press, 2011.
LAWRENCE, M.; LOW, G. Exploring individual user satisfaction within user-led development. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), p. 195-208, 1993.
MAKI, R. H. et al. Evaluation of a Web-based introductory psychology course: learning and satisfaction in online versus lecture courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, v. 32, n. 2, p. 230–239, 2000.
MOHAMMADI, H. Investigating users' perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 45, p. 359-374, 2015.
MORALES, C.; CORY, C.; BOZELL, D. A comparative efficiency study between a live lecture and a Web-based live-switched multi-camera streaming video distance learning instructional unit. In: INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2001, Toronto. Proceedings […]. Toronto, Ontario, 2001. p. 63–66.
MTEBE J. S.; RAISAMO R. A model For Assessing Learning Management System Success in Higher Education in Sub-Saharan Countries. EJISDC, v. 61, n. 7, p. 1-17, 2014.
NITZL, C.; HIRSCH, B. The drivers of a superior’s trust formation in his subordinate: The manager–management accountant example. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, v. 12, n. 4, p. 472-503, 2016.
ÖZDEMIR, S.; SONMEZ CAKIR, F.; ADIGUZEL, Z. "Examination of customer relations management in banks in terms of strategic, technological and innovation capability", Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science, v. 2, p. 176-195, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMARS-12-2021-0044.
PAYNE, N. J. et al. Placing a hand in the fire: Assessing the impact of a YouTube experiential learning project on viral marketing knowledge acquisition. Journal of Marketing Education, n. 2, p. 204-216, 2011.
PETTER, S.; DELONE, W.; MCLEAN, E. Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 17, n. 3, p. 236-263, 2008.
PETTER, S.; DELONE, W.; MCLEAN, E. R. The past, present, and future of IS success. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, v. 13, n. 5, p. 341-362, 2012.
PICCOLI, G.; AHMAD, R.; IVES, B. Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, v. 25, n. 4, p. 401–426, 2001.
PITT, L. F.; WATSON, R. T.; KAVAN, C. B. Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), 173e187. 1995.
RAI, A.; LANG, S.; WELKER, R. Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), v. 13, n. 1, p. 50-69, 2002.
RATZMANN, M.; GUDERGAN, S. P.; BOUNCKEN, R. Capturing heterogeneity and PLS-SEM prediction ability: Alliance governance and innovation. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 10, p. 4593-4603, 2016.
RAYMOND, L. Organization context and information systems success: A contingency approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 6, n. 4, p. 5-20, 1990.
RAYMOND, L. Organizational characteristics and MIS success in the context of small business. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), v. 9, n. 1, v. 37, 1985. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249272.
ROCKART, J. F. The changing role of the information systems executive: A critical success factors perspective. MIS Quarterly Special Issue, dec. 1982.
SAKAGUCHI, T.; FROLICK, M. A review of data warehousing literature. Journal of Data Warehousing, v. 2, n. 1, p. 34-54, 1997.
SEDDON, P. B. et al. Dimensions of information systems success. Commun. AIS, v. 2, n. 3, 1999.
SRINIVASAN, A. Alternative measure of systems effectiveness: Association and implications. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), v. 9, n. 3, p. 243-253, 1985.
SUN, P.-C. et al. What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1183-1202, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007.
SWAID, S. I.; WIGAND, R.T. Measuring the Quality of E-Service: Scale Development and Initial Validation. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, v. 10, n. 13, 2009.
URBACH, N.; SMOLNIK, S.; RIEMPP, G. An empirical investigation of employee portal success. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, v. 19, n. 3, 184e206, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.06.002.
WANG, Y.-S.; WANG, H.-Y.; SHEE, D. Y. Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 23, n. 4, p. 1792-1808, 2007.
YAP, C.; SOH, C.; RAMAN, K. Information systems success factors in small business. Omega, v. 20, n. 5-6, p. 597-609, 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(92) 90005-R.
ZHANG, D. et al. Can E-Learnıng Replace Classroom Learning, Communıcatıons Of The Acm, v. 47, n. 5, 2004.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. É vedada a submissão integral ou parcial do manuscrito a qualquer outro periódico. A responsabilidade do conteúdo dos artigos é exclusiva dos autores. É vedada a tradução para outro idioma sem a autorização escrita do Editor ouvida a Comissão Editorial Científica.
