Pedagogical and axiological strategies of enlightenment realism

Aleksej Pashkurov

doi:10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17344

Autores

Aleksej Pashkurov Kazan Federal University, Kazan – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-736X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17344

Palavras-chave:

Enlightenment realism, Axiology, Philosophy of enlightenment, Pedagogical theories, Utopia

Resumo

A partir do exemplo do movimento global do realismo iluminista na segunda metade do século XVIII – início do século XIX, examinar a dinâmica da correlação de ideias didáticas (pedagógicas) e axiológicas no sistema do processo sociocultural geral do início da Nova Era. Para ter uma ideia completa da ideologia social desse movimento, os autores consideram as principais discussões e teorias acadêmicas do século XX e início do século XXI. Os autores traçam as perspectivas de considerar as ideologias do realismo iluminista e do Iluminismo com foco na chamada "cultura do meio-termo" em sua gênese e desenvolvimento. Neste artigo, a questão do realismo iluminista como um sistema pedagógico-valor tanto na cultura literária quanto nos processos sociais e sociais das décadas de 1760-1820 é considerada de forma abrangente pela primeira vez.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Aleksej Pashkurov, Kazan Federal University, Kazan – Russia

Doctor of Philology, Professor.

Referências

ANDREEV, V. I. Pedagogy. Training course for creative self-development. Kazan, 2000.

BARRAN, T. Russians read Rousseau 1762-1825. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2002.

BAZHENOVA, T. P. Europeanization of Russian culture: The essence and features. 2005. Dissertation (Candidate of Philosophical Sciences) – Bazhenova, Tatyana Petrovna, 2005. Available in: http://www.dissercat.com/content/evropeizatsiya-russkoi-kultury-sushchnost-i-osobennosti. Access in: 21 Feb. 2022.

BOREV, Yu. B. Prosvetitelskii realizm [Literary realism]. Teoriya literatury, tom IV: Literaturnyi protsess [Theory of Literature. v. 4: Literary Process]. Moscow: Institut mirovoi literatury [Institute of World Literature], 2001.

BUSHKANETS, L. E. et al. Problems of Modern Higher Education in the Sphere of Russian Philology and the Ways of Solving them (on the Example of the Situation in Kazan Federal University). International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, v. 11, n. 6, p. 1231-1236, 2016. Available in: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1114298. Access in: 10 Oct. 2021.

DEHNE, M. The epochal change in the Russian poetry in 1800: Transitions from klassischAufklärerishen to modern knowledge in the poetics of Derzhavin, Karamzin and Batjuskov, 2010.

FEDOROV, V. I. Literaturnye napravleniya v russkoi literature XVIII veka [Trends in Russian literature of the 18th century]. Moscow: Publishing House "Prosveshcheniye", 1979.

GULYAEV, N. A. O svoeobrazii prosvetitelskogo realizma [On the literary realism diversity]. Filologicheskie nauki [Philology. Theory & Practice], v. 2, p. 165-176, 1966.

KARPOV, V. V. et al. Methodological framework of forming territorial innovation clusters based on import substitution Mechanism. Espacios, v. 38, n. 58, p. 11, Aug. 2017. Available in: https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n58/17385811.html. Access in: 12 Feb. 2022.

KLEIN, J. The ways of cultural import. Works on Russia literature of 18th century. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kultury [Languages of Slavic culture], 2005.

KULAKOVA, L. I. Prosvetitelstvo i literaturnye napravleniya XVIII veka [Enlightenment and literary trends of the 18th century]. Problemy russkogo Prosveshcheniya v literature XVIII veka [Problems of the Enlightenment in Russia in the Literature of the 18th Century]. Moscow – Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR [Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR], 1961.

KUMBS, F. G. The crisis of education in the modern world: System analysis. Moscow, 1970.

LAPPO-DANILEVSKII, R. Yu. Vospitatelnyi pafos russkogo Prosveshcheniya [Educational pathos of the Russian Enlightenment]. Russkaya literatura [Russian Literature], n. 3, 187-190, 2003.

LEHMANN-CARLI, M. G. et al. Russian reconnaissance reception in the context of official educational concepts (1700-1825). Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH, 2001.

LOUIS, K. S.; MURPHY, J. Trust, caring and organizational learning: The leader’s role. Journal of Educational Administration, v. 55, n. 1, p. 103-126, 2017. Available in: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEA-07-2016-0077/full/html. Access in: 16 June 2022.

MAKAROV, A. N. et al. The Pre-Romantic, the Sentimental, and the Trivial in the Late 18th Century German Literature. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, v. 9, n. 3, p. 103-114, 2017. Available in: https://rupkatha.com/V9/n3/v9n311.pdf. Access in: 26 Oct. 2021.

MAKOGONENKO, G. P. Ot Fonvizina do Pushkina [From Fonvizin to Pushkin]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo khudozhestvennoi literatury [State Publishing House of Fiction], 1969.

NOVIKOV, A. M. Russian education in a new era. Moscow, 2000.

ORLOV, V. Russkie prosvetiteli 1790-1800-kh godov [Russian Enlighteners of the 1790s-1800s]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo khudozhestvennoi literatury [State Publishing House of Fiction], 1953.

PASHKUROV, A. N.; LI, P. Kultura galantnosti perekhodnogo vremeni v fokuse problemy mezhkulturnoi kommunikatsii [Gallantry culture of the transition period in the context of the problem of intercultural communication]. Filologiya i kultura [Philology and culture], v. 1, n. 59, p. 197-203. 2020.

PASHKUROV, A. N.; RAZZHIVIN, A. I. Literary culture as a dialog of contradictions and reconciler (basing on review of poetics of Russian literature of 18th – beginning of 19th century). Life Science Journal, v. 11, n. 8s, p. 120-124, 2014.

PASHKUROV, A. N.; RAZZHIVIN, A. I. Literary Culture: its Types and Lessons. European Journal of Science and Theology, v. 12, n. 2, p. 155-164, 2016. Available in: http://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/57/15_Pashkurov%20&%20Razzhivin.pdf. Access in: 10 Feb. 2022.

PASHKUROV, A. N.; RAZZHIVIN, A. I.; DULALAEVA, I. Yu. The Idyll and the Problems of Harmonizing Culture. Opcion, v. 34, n. 85, p. 1904-1917, 2018.

PRIKAZCHIKOVA, E. E. Kulturnyi mif o romane-razvratitele i sposoby ego preodoleniya v russkoi literature epokhi prosveshcheniya [Cultural myth about the novel-tempter and ways to overcome it in Russian literature of the Enlightenment]. Filologicheskie nauki [Philology. Theory & Practice], v. 4, p. 74-86, 2009.

SLAVIN, R. E. The Cooperative Revolution in Education. The Education Digest., v. 54, n. 1, p. 22-24, 1988.

STEPANOV, N. L. Prosvetitelskii realizm XVIII – nachala XIX v [Literary realism of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th centuries.]. Problemy tipologii russkogo realizma [Typology problems of Russian realism]. Moscow: Nauka [Science], 1969.

TROYAN, I. I. The pedagogical thought of Russia in the second half of the 18th century about raising children in the family. 1999. Dissertation (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences) – 1999. Available in: https://www.dissercat.com/content/pedagogicheskaya-mysl-rossii-vtoroi-poloviny-xviii-veka-o-vospitanii-detei-v-seme. Access in: 06 Apr. 2019.

VOGT, U. R. Tipologicheskie raznovidnosti russkogo realizma [Typological varieties of Russian realism]. Problemy tipologii russkogo realizma [Typology problems of Russian realism]. Moscow: Nauka [Science], 1969.