The concept of creative doing as the basis for the organization of educational and design research work of university students

Elena Gladysheva

doi:10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17342

Autores/as

Elena Gladysheva MIREA – Russian Technological University, Moscow – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-6437

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17342

Palabras clave:

Creative doing, The concept of creative doing, Educational work, Design and research activities, Humanitarian education, Higher education

Resumen

El propósito de este trabajo es definir el término hacer creativo, comparándolo con los términos creación y creatividad; definición del concepto de hacer creativo y su estructura, demostración de ejemplos de aplicación práctica del concepto de hacer creativo en el trabajo de diseño e investigación de estudiantes universitarios. Al organizar el trabajo educativo y de investigación de los estudiantes, se utilizó un enfoque de proyecto-actividad. La ilustración de proyectos creativos exitosos se lleva a cabo en el curso de la organización de excursiones con estudiantes a museos, fincas, lugares históricos y memorables por parte de los maestros. El concepto de hacer creativo se ilustra con el ejemplo de las actividades de los empresarios rusos de finales del siglo XIX y principios del XX. Se proponen temas específicos y etapas de organización del trabajo de diseño e investigación de los estudiantes, que es el significado práctico de este estudio.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Elena Gladysheva, MIREA – Russian Technological University, Moscow – Russia

Candidate in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences.

Citas

ARHIPOVA, O.V.; SHOR, Y. M. Metafizika tvorchestva: Monografiya [Metaphysics of creativity: A monograph]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2021. 186 p.

BENTA, D.; BOLOGA, G.; DZITAC, I. E-learning platforms in higher education. Case study. Procedia Computer Science, v. 31, p. 1170-1176, 2014.

BERDYAEV, N.A. Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka [The meaning of creativity. The experience of justifying a person]. Moscow: Publishing house G.A. Leman and S.I. Sakharov, 1916.

BESKOVA, I.A. What can the study of culture give to the researcher of crativity. In: Smirnova, N. M. (Ed.). Filosofiya tvorchestva. Ezhegodnik RAN. IF. Sektor filosofskih problem tvorchestva [The philosophy of creativity. Yearbook of the Russian Academy of Sciences. IF. Sector of philosophical problems of creativity]. Moscow: Golos, 2020. p. 27-98.

BOGOYAVLENSKAYA, D.B. Report at the First Russian Scientific and Practical conference "Philosophy of Creativity". Moscow: IFRAN, 2015.

BOGOYAVLENSKAYA, D.B. The mechanism of creativity: Why we discover new things. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], n. 9, p. 82–89, 2021.

BRIAN, G. In the shadow of culture. In: Budushchee nauki v XXI veke. Sleduyushchie pyat'desyat let [The future of science in the XXI century. The next fifty years]. Moscow: AST: Astrel’; Vladimir: VKT, 2011.

BULGAKOV, S. N. Filopodia hozyajstva [Philosophy of economy]. Moscow: Nauka, 1990.

CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY. n.d. Available in: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/. Access: 5 jan. 2022.

DE CORTE, E. Innovative perspectives of teaching and learning in higher education in the XXI century. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Education issues], n. 3, p. 8-29, 2014.

EFIMOVA, G. Z.; SOROKIN, A. N.; GRIBOVSKY, M. V. Ideal teacher of higher school: Personal qualities and socio-professional competencies. Obrazovanie i Nauka [The Education and Science Journal], v. 23, n. 1, p. 202–230, 2021. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-202-230.

EFROIMSON, V.P. Genetika genial'nosti [The genetics of genius]. Moscow: AST, 2019. 480 p.

ENGELMEYER, P. K. Teoriya tvorchestva [Theory of creativity]. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom “Librokom”, 2010.

FLORIDA, R. Kreativnyj klass: Lyudi kotorye menyayut budushchee [Cretive class: People who are changing the future]. Moscow: Izdatel'skij dom “Klassika-XXI”, 2011.

FRANK, S. L. Smysl zhizni [The meaning of life]. Brussels: Zhizn' s Bogom, 1992. 78 p.

FRANKL, V. E. Man`s search of meaning. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2006.

GARDNER, G. Myshlenie budushchego. Pyat' strategij, vedushchih k uspekhu v zhizni [Thinking of the future. Five strategies leading to success in life]. Moscow: Al'pina Pablisher, 2019. 224 p.

GAUT, B. The philosophy of creativity. Philosophy Compass, v. 5, n. 12, p. 1034-1046, 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00351.x

GLADYSHEVA, E. The concept of creative doing in the philosophy of I.A. Ilyin and its application in modern liberal arts education in the high school. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya [Prospects of science and education], v. 2, n. 50, p. 10-22, 2021. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2021.2.1

GLADYSHEVA, E. V. Modern family in Russia: Philosophical understanding, experience of sociological analysis. In: RASTORGUEV, V. N. (Ed.). VIII anniversary Pan-Tatar readings "Youth - culture - politics: Historical memory and civilizational choice". Collection of articles. Moscow: MAX-PRESS, 2012. p. 460-468.

GLADYSHEVA, E.V. The influence of moral values on the success of economic activity (on the example of domestic entrepreneurs of the XIX-XX centuries). Rossijskij tekhnologicheskij zhurnal [Russian Technological Journal], v. 5, n. 4(18), p. 67-76, 2017.

GLADYSHEVA, E.V.; GLADYSHEVA, M.I. The phenomenon of creation in Russian culture. Cennosti i smysly [Values and meanings], v., n. 43, p. 89-100, 2016.

GORELOV, A. A. Freedom of thought and anti-creation. In: SMIRNOVA, N. M. (Ed.). Filosofiya tvorchestva. Ezhegodnik RAN. IF. Sektor filosofskih problem tvorchestva [The philosophy of creativity. Yearbook of the Russian Academy of Sciences. IF. Sector of philosophical problems of creativity]. Moscow: Golos, 2020. p. 136-182.

GRECHKO, P. K. Chelovek. K voprosu o proyektirovanii sebya [Person. On the question of designing oneself]. Questions of social theory, v. 8, n. 1-2, p. 25–34, 2016.

HARARI, Y. N. Homo Deus: Kratkaya istoriya budushchego [Homo Deus: A brief history of the future]. Moscow: Sindbad, 2018. 496 p.

ILYIN, I.A. Put' duhovnogo obnovleniya [The path of spiritual renewal]. St. Petersburg: Bibliopolis, 2006. 436 p.

IVIN, A.A. Filosofiya kollektivnogo tvorchestva: Monografiya [The philosophy of collective creativity: Monograph]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021. 352 p.

JUDRUPS, J. Analysis of knowledge management and e-learning integration models. Procedia Computer Science, v. 43, p. 154-162, 2015.

KARPOV, A.O. Universities in the Knowledge society: The problem of institutionalization of creativity. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical sciences], v. 62, no. 2, p. 77–95, 2019.

KEENGWE, J.; GEORGINA, D. The digital course training workshop for online learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, v. 17, n. 4, p. 365-379, 2012.

KROU, M.; DEBARS, U. Model' Novogo amerikanskogo universiteta [The model of the New American University]. Moscow: VSE, 2017. 440 p.

LEPSKY, V. Subject-oriented approach to the analysis of the crisis of technogenic civilization. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], n. 11, p. 35–38, 2021.

MARINOSYAN, H.E. Traditions and prospects of the classical University in the modern world. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical sciences], v. 64, n. 5, p. 7-19, 2021.

MAY, R. Muzhestvo tvorit' [The courage to create]. St.-Petersburg: Piter, 2020.

MINDELL, A. Kvantovyj um: Gran' mezhdu fizikoj i psihologiej [The quantum mind: The line between physics and psychology]. Moscow: Ganga, 2018. 716 p.

MINDELL, A. Snovidenie kak istochnik tvorchestva: 30 tvorcheskih i volshebnyh sposobov raboty nad soboj [The dream as a source of creativity: 30 creative and magical ways to work on yourself]. Moscow: Ganga, 2019. 288 p.

MORENO, V.; CAVAZOTTE, F.; ALVES, I. Explaining university students' effective use of e-learning platforms. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 48, n. 4, p. 995-1009, 2017.

NEMYCHENKOV, V.I. (Ed.). Tvorchestvo i razvitie obshchestva v XXI veke. Vzglyad nauki, filosofii i bogosloviya: Sbornik statej [Creativity and development of society in the XXI century. The view of science, philosophy and theology: A collection of articles]. Moscow: Aleteya, 2017. 606 p.

OXFORD DICTIONARY. n.d. Disponível em: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com. Access: 5 jan. 2022.

PEOPLES, J.; BAILEY, G. Humanity: An introduction to cultural anthropology. 11. ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning, 2017. 480 p.

PERIĆ, J. et al. Generation Z and volunteering: A national culture perspective. Obrazovanie i Nauka [The Education and Science Journal], v. 23, n. 1, p. 44–72, 2021. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-44-72

ROZIN, V. Man in the context of the transition from man-made civilization to post-culture (notes of a methodologist and a culturologist). Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], n. 11, p. 51-55, 2021.

SARTRE, J.-P. Existentialism is a humanism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007.

SAVKA, O.G. The impact of the humanitarian environment on improving the quality of training of specialists at a technical university. Rossijskij tekhnologicheskij zhurnal [Russian Technological Journal], v. 9, n. 5, p. 92-102, 2021. DOI: 10.32362/2500-316X-2021-9-5-95-101

STEPIN, V.S. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [The new philosophical encyclopedia]. 2. ed. Moscow: Mysl’, 2010.

UNESCO. Education 2030: Education outlook report, Mar. 8, 2019. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366976_eng/PDF/366976eng.pdf.multi. Acesso em: 5 jan. 2021.

UNESCO. Message from Ms Audrey Azoulay, Director-General of UNESCO, on the occasion of the International Day of Education. 2022. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380334?27=null&queryId=N-5060af81-899a-4c9f-8f9e-b81cbbcb. Acesso em: 5 fev. 2021.