Pensamiento crítico en la educación

perspectivas interculturales y análisis de indicadores agregados del PISA

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp4.20775

Palabras clave:

Pensamiento crítico, Comparación intercultural, Política educativa, PISA, Eslovaquia

Resumen

El artículo analiza el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en el sistema educativo eslovaco a partir de evidencia intercultural de PISA y PIAAC. Dado que estas evaluaciones no miden directamente el pensamiento crítico, el estudio emplea indicadores sustitutos, como alfabetización lectora, resolución de problemas y pensamiento creativo. Con base en un análisis secundario comparativo de bases de datos de la OCDE, los hallazgos muestran una disminución sostenida en la alfabetización lectora en Eslovaquia, una alta proporción de estudiantes con bajo rendimiento, resultados por debajo del promedio en pensamiento creativo y habilidades más débiles de resolución de problemas entre adultos. La evidencia señala brechas persistentes en habilidades cognitivas de orden superior. Los patrones internacionales indican alineación con dinámicas globales impulsadas por la digitalización, la desigualdad socioeconómica y los cambios en los hábitos de aprendizaje. El artículo recomienda reformas sistémicas centradas en el rediseño curricular, el desarrollo docente, intervenciones tempranas y apoyo estructurado a pedagogías dialógicas y basadas en la indagación. El fortalecimiento del pensamiento crítico se presenta como una prioridad estratégica para el desempeño académico, la competitividad laboral y la resiliencia social.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Lukas Kopac, Slovak University of Technology

Institute of Management, Slovak University of Technology, Vazovova 5, 812 43 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Bianca Triebel, DTI University

DTI University, Sladkovicova 533/20, 018 41 Dubnica nad Vahom, Slovakia.

Monica Romano Berner, DTI University

DTI University, Sladkovicova 533/20, 018 41 Dubnica nad Vahom, Slovakia.

Uwe Volkmann, Danubius University

Danubius University, Richterova 1171, 925 21 Sladkovicovo, Slovakia.

Citas

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314558493

Bensley, D. A. (1998). Critical thinking in psychology: A unified skills approach. Brooks & Cole.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.

Butler, H. A., Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., Franco, A., & Almeida, L. S. (2012). Extending the validity of Halpern critical thinking assessments: Cross-national applications. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.03.002

Cannistrà, M., Agasisti, T., Amagir, A., Põder, K., Holz, O., Vartiak, L., & Witte, K. de. (2022). A comparative analysis of financial literacy levels and initiatives among students in five European countries. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17(2), 246–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999211066183

Cannistrà, M., Beckker, K. de, Agasisti, T., Amagir, A., Põder, K., Vartiak, L., & Witte, K. de. (2024). The impact of an online game-based financial education course: Multi-country experimental evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 52(4), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2024.08.001

Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). How can we teach for meaningful learning? In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (pp. 1–10). Jossey-Bass.

Dewey, J. (1998). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Houghton Mifflin.

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2012). An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9092-1

Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). W. H. Freeman.

European Commission. (2016). A new skills agenda for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2767/576581

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction: The Delphi report. American Philosophical Association. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315423

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://www.insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia/pdf/what-why.pdf

Garbarová, M., & Vartiak, L. (2021). Consequences of the sharing economy on passenger transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 55, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.06.006

Garbarová, M., & Vartiak, L. (2024). Support of human entrepreneurial capital in creative industries. Journal of Organizational Behavior Research, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.51847/jl6y7AimXu

Halpern, D. F. (2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885278

Jukes, I., & McCain, T. (2002). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ku, K. Y. L. (2009). Assessing students’ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.02.001

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–46. https://www.educationforthinking.org/sites/default/files/page-image/1-01DevelopmentalModelCriticalThinking.pdf

Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliot, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489914

Nussbaum, E., Dove, I., & Putney, L. (2023). Bridging dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory through critical questions. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.548

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). PISA 2022 results. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9c2e4aed-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 country note: Slovak Republic. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2022_CN_SVK.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). PISA 2024 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9c2e4aed-en

Paul, R. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075823

Redecker, C., et al. (2011). The future of learning: Preparing for change. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC66836

Taber, K. S. (2025). Developing intellectual sophistication and scientific thinking: The schemes of William G. Perry and Deanna Kuhn. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice (pp. 215–231). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81351-1_13

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444

Publicado

20/12/2025

Cómo citar

Kopac, L., Triebel, B., Romano Berner, M., & Volkmann, U. (2025). Pensamiento crítico en la educación: perspectivas interculturales y análisis de indicadores agregados del PISA. Revista on Line De Política E Gestão Educacional, 29(esp4), e025104. https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v29iesp4.20775

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a