Diseñar el proceso educativo de las matemáticas en el contexto de la metadisciplinaridad de la educación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25i3.15989Palabras clave:
Estándares educativos, Interdisciplinariedad, Metadisciplinariedad, Supradisciplinariedad, Enfoque axiomáticoResumen
El artículo está dedicado a uno de los temas actuales: el problema del diseño de procesos educativos. Entre las innovaciones del espacio educativo ruso, un lugar especial pertenece a la dirección metadisciplinaria, nueva para la pedagogía doméstica. La comprensión de la categoría de la metadisciplinariedad tanto en el aspecto teórico como aplicado desde la posición de la visión moderna se vuelve especialmente importante. Hasta cierto punto, la complejidad del problema está determinada por la traducción ambigua del prefijo “meta”. Recientemente, se han realizado muchos estudios dedicados a la metadisciplinariedad. El análisis de trabajos científicos sobre este problema no mostró un punto de vista único sobre este tema. El enfoque axiomático se propone como una de las opciones para construir una estrategia educativa en el campo metadisciplinario. Este estudio tiene como objetivo mostrar la posibilidad de utilizar este último en el diseño del proceso educativo matemático como parte de la implementación de la dirección metadisciplinaria de los estándares educativos.
Descargas
Citas
ASMOLOV, A. G. System-activity approach in developing new generation standards. Pedagogy, v. 4, p. 18-22, 2009.
BOROVSKIKH, A.V.; ROZOV, N. Activity principles in pedagogy and pedagogical logic: Handbook for the system of professional education, retraining and advanced training of scientific and pedagogical staff. Moscow: MaksPress, 2010.
COTNER, S.; BALLEN, C. J. Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable? PLoS ONE, v. 12, n. 12, p. 1-11, 2017.
DANSO, J. Developing students’ independent skills through the use of Assessment for Learning strategies: How does this affect engagement? Oxford: University of Oxford, 2017.
DEGTYAREVA, N. V. The value of metadisciplinary content in forming professional competencies. Interactive Science, v. 11, p. 46-47, 2017.
FABIANO, J. A.; REDDY, L. A.; DUDEK, C. M. Teacher coaching supported by formative assessment for improving classroom practices. School Psychology quarterly, v. 33, n. 2, p. 293-304, 2018.
FURTAK, E. M. et al. Theachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, v. 44, p. 267-291, 2016.
KAPSALIS, G. et al. Evidence of innovative assessment: literature review and case studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019.
KHUTORSKOY, A.V. Five levels of implementation of the metadisciplinary approach in the content of education. Bulletin of the Institute of Human Education, v. 2, 2017.
KULASEGARAM, K.; RANGACHARI, P. K. Beyond “formative”: assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in Physiology Education, v. 42, p. 5–14, 2018.
MARZANO, R. Using Formative Assessment with SEL Skills. Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning: Research and Practice, 2016.
MONAKHOV, V. M. Didactic axiomatics of the cognitive theory of pedagogical technologies. Modern Information Technologies and IT-education, v. 12, n. 3-1, p. 32-39, 2016.
MUSINA, A. A.; SHESTAKOV, A. P. Metadisciplinarity in primary general education. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, v. 3, p. 53-56, 2017.
O’KEEFE, B.; LEWIS, B. A look forward on innovation testing systems. The state of assessment. – Bellwether Education Partners, 2019.
RYMANOVA, T. E. Axiomatic approach to implementing the metadisciplinary component of the new educational standards in mathematics. Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University, Electronic Scientific Journal, v. 1, n. 29, p. 242-250, 2019.
RYMANOVA, T. E. Designing the educational process in mathematics in the context of the second-generation standards: study guide. Yelets: Yelets State University, named after I.A. Bunin, 2017.
RYMANOVA, T. E. Implementation of metadisciplinarity in the educational process: study guide. Yelets: Yelets State University, named after I.A. Bunin, 2018.
SMIRNOVA, I. M. Implementation of the metadisciplinary approach in teaching geometry. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Physics-Mathematics, v. 2, p. 94-99, 2018.
SUSHENTSEVA, N. V.; MERLINA, N. I. The formation of meta-disciplinary universal learning activities in out-of-school activities in mathematics in grades 5-6. Bulletin of the Chuvash State Pedagogical University named after I.Y. Yakovlev, v. 1, n. 89, p. 164-169, 2016.
VAN DER VLEUTEN, C.; SLUIJSMANS, D.; BRINKE, D. J. Competence Assessment as Learner Support in Education. Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education, Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, v. 23, p. 607-608, 2017.
VOINEA, L. Formative assessment as assessment for learning development. Journal of Pedagogy, v. 1, p. 7-23, 2018.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. É vedada a submissão integral ou parcial do manuscrito a qualquer outro periódico. A responsabilidade do conteúdo dos artigos é exclusiva dos autores. É vedada a tradução para outro idioma sem a autorização escrita do Editor ouvida a Comissão Editorial Científica.
