Um estudo fenomenológico sobre o pensamento da cidadania na era digital além do antropocentrismo

Ipek Maaşoğlu

doi:10.22633/rpge.v30iesp2.21346

Autores/as

Ipek Maaşoğlu Near East University https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4115-0486

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v30iesp2.21346

Palabras clave:

Educación para la ciudadanía, Poshumanismo, Futuros docentes de ciencias sociales, Crítica del antropocentrismo, Fenomenología cualitativa

Resumen

Esta investigación examina cómo el concepto de ciudadanía en el mundo digital trasciende los límites antropocéntricos, basándose en las opiniones de 46 futuros docentes de ciencias sociales. El estudio, diseñado con un enfoque fenomenológico, sometió los datos a un análisis temático utilizando el software MAXQDA. Como resultado del análisis se obtuvieron 173 códigos significativos (f), que se estructuraron en cuatro temas principales: subjetividad digital, actores no humanos, agencia algorítmica y pedagogía poshumanista. Los hallazgos demuestran que los participantes definen la ciudadanía en gran medida a través de la producción de datos y la huella digital (f 86 con una intensidad del 50 %), mientras que comenzaron a ver la inteligencia artificial como un agente de toma de decisiones (f 31). Esta ramificación conceptual, visualizada mediante el análisis Word Tree, muestra que los docentes en formación se encuentran en un punto de inflexión mental. En conclusión, se recomienda que el plan de estudios de ciencias sociales no se limite a la formación de habilidades técnicas, sino que se reestructure con una pedagogía poshumanista que abarque la conexión ética establecida con las máquinas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Ipek Maaşoğlu, Near East University

Universidade Near East , Nicosia – North Cyprus – Turqui. Professor Associado, Faculdade de Educação Atatürk, Divisão de Currículo e Instrução.

Citas

Achella, S. (2026). Networked humanity: An enactivist paradigm for aligning humans, nonhumans, and machines. Topoi, 1–11.

Banks, J. A. (Ed.). (2004). Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives. Jossey-Bass.

Biesta, G. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society: Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Sense Publishers.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

Budić, M. (2025). Beyond anthropocentrism? AI, moral responsibility, and the shifting boundaries of the moral community. In International Scientific Conference: Social Aspects of the Application of Artificial Intelligence and Transhumanism (pp. 62–63). Institute of Social Sciences and Research and Development Institute for Artificial Intelligence of Serbia.

Cook, D. A., Ginsburg, S., Sawatsky, A. P., Kuper, A., & D'Angelo, J. D. (2025). Artificial intelligence to support qualitative data analysis: Promises, approaches, pitfalls. Academic Medicine, 100(10), 1134–1149. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006134

Falcke, S., & Peters, F. (2025). Rescaling citizenship: Revisiting debates on territory, rights, and membership. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 51(20), 5213–5240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2025.2550109

Ferrari, R. (2026). The postsocialist posthuman: Gregor Samsa's Chinese futures in Li Jianjun's The Metamorphosis. Theatre Survey, 67(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/tsu.2026.a980367

Friese, S., & Unterpertinger, E. (2026). CAQDAS and the grounded theory method. In G. Hadley & A. Bryant (Eds.), Grounded theory in action (pp. 23–35). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035321919.00008

Gordon, J. S. (2026). The robot rights manifesto. Palgrave Macmillan.

Haq, M., & Yasin, N. (2025). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodology paradigms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v6i6.144

Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.

Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.

Kumar, S., Verma, A. K., & Mirza, A. (2024). Digital transformation, artificial intelligence and society: Opportunities and challenges. Springer.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001

Lin, J. C. (2026). Negotiating global citizenship and nationalism: Shifting paradigms in Hong Kong's global citizenship education. European Journal of Education, 61(2), e70553. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70553

Liu, J., Shadiev, R., & Cao, M. (2025). Effects of digital citizenship educational game on teenagers' learning achievement, motivation, cognitive load, and behavioral patterns. Education and Information Technologies, 30(11), 15817–15870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13399-7

Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. Open University Press.

Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Damiani, V., & Friedman, T. (2025). Education for citizenship in times of global challenge: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 international report. Springer.

Shibuya, K. (2020). Digital transformation of identity in the age of artificial intelligence. Springer.

Suzuki, S. (2025). Human transformation and generative universality: Rethinking citizenship in the posthuman age. Paragrana, 34(2), 281–291.

Tan, K. H. (2025). Reconceptualizing moral agency and stakeholder rights in socio-economic systems: A framework for including non-human entities while preserving human dignity and democratic accountability. PhilPapers. https://zenodo.org/records/17667742

Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237