Formation of external cognitive tools among future teachers of chemistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.6.16095Keywords:
Cognitive didactics, Education, Cognitive tools, Thinking style, Cognitive activityAbstract
It is important to understand the features of the instrumental side of the cognitive organization of each student, in the process of teaching and upbringing, as a reflection of the properties of the integral structure of the human cognition system. The article is devoted to the problem of identifying and using the prevailing styles of thinking of students, future teachers, in the process of their vocational training at the university. Goal of research ‑ determine the prevailing style of students' thinking activity with a possible typology. The relevance of the problem under study is associated with the need to solve the issue of the optimal use of the individual thinking characteristics of bachelor students, future chemistry teachers, for the development of their methodical thinking as the integration of scientific thinking of a separate taught science, scientific - research pedagogical thinking and applied pedagogical thinking. The authors point out that the master's degree program should also use the idea of implementing and researching students ' mental operations in a certain sequence: presentation of knowledge → structuring knowledge → transformation of knowledge in conjunction with the main tools of thinking, as the highest stage of human cognition - concept, judgment and inference. As a research methodology, the article proposes the use of diagnostics by A. Alekseeva and L. Gromova "Individual styles of thinking" to determine the styles of thinking, the purpose of which is to study the individual characteristics of thinking. It has been established that the implementation of the methodology used contributes to the study of the basic styles of thinking of students: synthetic, idealistic, pragmatic, analytical, and realistic. The information obtained will allow each teacher at the second stage of higher education - the magistracy, to rebuild the teaching method of his discipline with a focus on the personality characteristics of the cognitive tools of each student individually and the entire group together.
Downloads
References
COGNITIVE pedagogy: e-learning technologies in the professional development of the teacher: a collective monograph. Yakutsk, 2016. 337 p.
EVANS, V. How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 396 p.
GILMANSHIN, I. R. et al. Methods of training specialists in the field of sustainable resource management and waste management. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, v. 570, n. 1, 012025, 2019.
GILMANSHIN, I. R.; GILMANSHINA, S. I. Stages of formation of scientific thinking of students in terms of engineering education at the university. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, v. 412, n. 1, 012021, 2018.
GILMANSHINA, S. I. et al. Science Education: Development of Environmental Thinking. European Research Studies Journal, v. XXI, n. 3, p. 690-704, 2018.
GILMANSHINA, S. I. et al. Digital learning technologies in the University education system. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, v. 570, n. 1, 012027, 2019a.
GILMANSHINA, S. I. et al. Formation of competencies of the 21st century by means of project activities. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, v. 570, n. 1, 2019b. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/570/1/012026
GILMEEVA, R. K. et al. Cognitive pedagogy: study guide. Under the scientific editorship of E.Yu. Levina. - Kazan: Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Social Problems, 2020. 228 p.
KAMALEEVA, A. R. Cognitive didactics concepts: focus on digitalization of higher education. Kazan pedagogical journal, n. 4, p. 31-38, 2020.
KAMALEEVA, A. R. The analysis and classification of technologies of implementation of natural-science and professional training of students of spo in the conditions of competence-based approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, p. 5-10, 2016.
KAMALEEVA, A. R. The formation of the cognitive tools of university students in the process of cognitive activity (in the context of technological learning). Bulletin of the Chuvash State Pedagogical University named after I. Ya. Yakovlev, v. 2, n. 105, p. 146-153, 2020.
KAMALEEVA, A. R.; MUKHAMETZYANOVA, L. Yu. Algorithm of step-by-step cognitive modeling in the natural science and humanitarian components of professional education. Bulletin of the Chuvash State Pedagogical University named after I. Ya. Yakovlev, v. 1, n. 101, p. 129-136, 2019.
LARGE encyclopaedical dictionary. Available: https://gufo.me/dict/bes-/%D0%9F%D0%9E%D0%97%D0%9D%D0%90%D0%9D%D0%98%D0%95. Access: 19 Dec. 2019.
SERGEEV, S. F. Cognitive pedagogy: custom properties of cognitive tools. Educational Technologies, n. 4. p. 69-68, 2012.
SIЕMENS, G. Knowing knowledge. 2006. Available: www.knowingknowledge.com. Access: 10 Jan. 2021.
VAIDYA, S.; CHANSKY, N. M. Cognitive development and cognitive style as factors in mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, n. 72, p. 326-330, 1980.
VODYAKHA, Yu. E. Psychological diagnostics of personality spheres: laboratory practice. Yekaterinburg, 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscritos aceitos e publicados são de propriedade da Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. É vedada a submissão integral ou parcial do manuscrito a qualquer outro periódico. A responsabilidade do conteúdo dos artigos é exclusiva dos autores. É vedada a tradução para outro idioma sem a autorização escrita do Editor ouvida a Comissão Editorial Científica.