Management of internal review processes for the accreditation of academic programs in universities

Fayez Abdulaziz Alfayez; Hasna Balaj Alotaibi

doi:10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17732

Autores

Fayez Abdulaziz Alfayez King Saud University (KSU), Riyadh – Saudi Arabia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6219-2165
Hasna Balaj Alotaibi Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj – Saudi Arabia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-3384

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v26i00.17732

Palavras-chave:

Avaliação interna, Programas acadêmicos, Ensino superior

Resumo

O estudo visa identificar a realidade da gestão dos processos de revisão interna para o credenciamento de programas acadêmicos em universidades sauditas. Uma abordagem de método misto foi usada na coleta de dados primários por meio do questionário e da entrevista. O questionário retornou 298 respostas válidas de acadêmicos selecionados aleatoriamente em seis universidades sauditas. Além disso, seis reitores de faculdades foram entrevistados. Os dados do questionário foram analisados usando o SPSS, enquanto os resultados das entrevistas foram codificados e sintetizados tematicamente. Os resultados globais do estudo mostram que o processo de avaliação interna relacionado com a acreditação de programas acadêmicos nas universidades baseia-se principalmente no plano acadêmico universitário geral criado a nível central. A implementação segue o planejamento durante o qual vários escritórios universitários em nível de faculdade e departamental foram adicionalmente envolvidos. A última fase do credenciamento do programa é a avaliação recorrente do sistema para garantir que as ofertas do programa estejam sincronizadas com as melhores práticas globais cultivadas para as necessidades da economia da Arábia Saudita.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Fayez Abdulaziz Alfayez, King Saud University (KSU), Riyadh – Saudi Arabia

Associate Professor, Educational Administration College of Education.

Hasna Balaj Alotaibi, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj – Saudi Arabia

Assistant Professor in Educational Administration, College of Education.

Referências

ALBAQAMI, S. Implementing Quality Assurance in Saudi Arabia: A Comparison between the MESO and the MICRO Levels at PSU. Higher Education Studies, v. 5, n. 3, p. 66–81, 2015.

ALGUNMEEYN, A. et al. Exploring staff perspectives of the barriers to the implementation of accreditation in Jordanian hospitals: Case study. International Journal of Healthcare Management, v. 14, n. 4, p. 1422–1428, 2021.

ALMALKI, A. M. Blended Learning in Higher Education. In: International Handbook of E-Learning, Volume 2, p. 121–132, 2020.

ALSHATWI, A. A. et al. Tomato powder is more protective than lycopene supplement against lipid peroxidation in rats. Nutrition Research, v. 30, v. 1, p. 66–73, 2020.

ALSISY, G. A. Perspectives of Academic Staff and Graduate Students on the Effects of Globalisation on Cultural Identity in Saudi Arabia: A case Study Persectives of Academic. Journal of Faculty of Education Assiut University, v. 36, n. 4, p. 1–36, 2020.

AVENA, N. M.; POTENZA, M. N.; GOLD, M. S. Why are we consuming so much sugar despite knowing too much can harm us? JAMA Internal Medicine. American Medical Association, 2015.

BEN SALHA, G. et al. Deterpenation of Origanum majorana L. essential oil by reduced pressure steam distillation. Industrial Crops and Products, v. 109, p. 116–122, 2017.

BOUKRARA, A. Using Goals Modeling in Educational Engineering: Application to Course Learning Outcomes Assessment (CLOs) at Aljouf University. Journal of education and human development, v. 8, n. 4, p. 2334-2978, 2019.

CRESWELL, A. et al. Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, 2018.

CROSS, M.; NAIDOO, D. Peer review and the dilemmas of quality control in programme accreditation in South African higher education: Challenges and possibilities. Higher Education Policy, 2011.

DEMIREL, E. Accreditation of Distance Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, v. 4, n. 10, p. 2457-2464, 2016.

ELKHATEEB, R. et al. Impact of domestic violence against pregnant women in Minia governorate, Egypt: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2021.

HUSSEIN, D.; SAADI, E. L.; FORAWI, S. A. The contribution of the UAE school inspection framework as a quality assurance tool for school transformation and performance improvement. The British University in Dubai (BUiD)‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬, 2017.

IBRAHIM, H. A.-H. Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Education. Open Journal of Education, v. 2, n. 2, p. 106, 2014.

KLASSEN, A. C. et al. I. Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research. Springer, 2012.

LEIBER, T.; MOUTAFIDOU, N.; WELKER, B. Impact evaluation of programme review at University of Stuttgart (Germany). European Journal of Higher Education, v. 8, n. (3), p. 337-350, 2018.

MARQUES, M.; POWELL, J. J. W. Ratings, rankings, research evaluation: how do Schools of Education behave strategically within stratified UK higher education? Higher Education, 2020.

MATTAR, M. Y. Combating Academic Corruption and Enhancing Academic Integrity through International Accreditation Standards: The Model of Qatar University. Journal of Academic Ethics, p. 1-28, 2021.

MEISSNER, H. et al. Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences. Methods, v. 29, p. 1-39, 2011.

PUN, B. T. et al. Caring for Critically Ill Patients with the ABCDEF Bundle: Results of the ICU Liberation Collaborative in Over 15,000 Adults. Critical Care Medicine, v. 47, n. 1, p. 3-14, 2019.

SAUDI ARABIA’S VISION 2030. ProQuest. n.d., 2020.

ULKER, N.; BAKIOGLU, A. An international research on the influence of accreditation on academic quality. Studies in Higher Education, v. 44, n. 9, p. 1507-1518, 2019.

WATTANASAP, S.; RESEARCH, T. S.-J. I. U. Accreditation: Through the Lens of Assessors. Researchgate.Net, 2019.